• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Gulf of Mexico oil geyser

Well, it looks like our president is really living in his own reality:ack2::ack2:
It truly saddens me that this is our leader of this country, because his inexperience is truly showing during this crisis. President Obama, it is better to keep your mouth shut, than to keep on spewing inaccurate information to your constituents. What may i ask is safe about eating seafood that is contaminated, or could be contaminated by oil? Obama seems to be telling people what he thinks they should hear, even if it's not the truth.

Mr Obama, please tell us the truth, not sugarcoated lies!:angry::angry::angry:
 
Well, it looks like our president is really living in his own reality:ack2::ack2:
It truly saddens me that this is our leader of this country, because his inexperience is truly showing during this crisis. President Obama, it is better to keep your mouth shut, than to keep on spewing inaccurate information to your constituents. What may i ask is safe about eating seafood that is contaminated, or could be contaminated by oil? Obama seems to be telling people what he thinks they should hear, even if it's not the truth.

Mr Obama, please tell us the truth, not sugarcoated lies!:angry::angry::angry:

:censored:

It's not lack of experience, he is very experienced and is doing a great job destroying this country. First you have to realize he is not for the American people and has his own agenda or shall I say the elites that control him have an agenda for the New World Order.
There's lots of truth out there if you seek it and not deny it!!

 
Last edited:


From the Ground: BP Censoring Media, Destroying Evidence
Riki OttMarine toxicologist and Exxon Valdez survivor RikiOtt.com
Posted: June 11, 2010 09:18 AM

Orange Beach, Alabama -- While President Obama insists that the federal government is firmly in control of the response to BP's spill in the Gulf, people in coastal communities where I visited last week in Louisiana and Alabama know an inconvenient truth: BP -- not our president -- controls the response. In fact, people on the ground say things are out of control in the gulf.

Even worse, as my latest week of adventures illustrate, BP is using federal agencies to shield itself from public accountability.

For example, while flying on a small plane from New Orleans to Orange Beach, the pilot suddenly exclaimed, "Look at that!" The thin red line marking the federal flight restrictions of 3,000 feet over the oiled Gulf region had just jumped to include the coastal barrier islands off Alabama.

"There's only one reason for that," the pilot said. "BP doesn't want the media taking pictures of oil on the beaches.
You should see the oil that's about six miles off the coast,
" he said grimly. We looked down at the wavy orange boom surrounding the islands below us. The pilot shook his head. "There's no way those booms are going to stop what's offshore from hitting those beaches."

BP knows this as well -- boom can only deflect oil under the calmest of sea conditions, not barricade it -- so they have stepped up their already aggressive effort to control what the public sees.

At the same time I was en route to Orange Beach, Clint Guidry with the Louisiana Shrimp Association and Dean Blanchard, who owns the largest shrimp processor in Louisiana, were in Grand Isle taking Anderson Cooper out in a small boat to see the oiled beaches. The U.S. Coast Guard held up the boat for 20 minutes - an intimidation tactic intended to stop the cameras from recording BP's damage. Luckily for Cooper and the viewing public, Dean Blanchard is not easily intimidated.

A few days later, the gig was up with the booms. Oil was making landfall in four states and even BP can't be everywhere at once. CBS 60 Minutes Australia found entire sections of boom hung up in marsh grasses two feet above the water off Venice. On the same day on the other side of Barataria Bay, Louisiana Bayoukeeper documented pools of oil and oiled pelicans inside the boom - on the supposedly protected landward side - of Queen Bess Island off Grand Isle.

With oil undisputedly hitting the beaches and the number of dead wildlife mounting, BP is switching tactics. In Orange Beach, people told me BP wouldn't let them collect carcasses. Instead, the company was raking up carcasses of oiled seabirds. "The heads separate from the bodies," one upset resident told me. "There's no way those birds are going to be autopsied. BP is destroying evidence!"

The body count of affected wildlife is crucial to prove the harm caused by the spill, and also serves as an invaluable tool to evaluate damages to public property - the dolphins, sea turtles, whales, sea birds, fish, and more, that are owned by the American public. Disappeared body counts means disappeared damages - and disappeared liability for BP. BP should not be collecting carcasses. The job should be given to NOAA, a federal agency, and volunteers, as was done during the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska.

NOAA should also be conducting carcass drift studies. Only one percent of the dead sea birds made landfall in the Gulf of Alaska, for example. That means for every one bird that was found, another 99 were carried out to sea by currents. Further, NOAA should be conducting aerial surveys to look for carcasses in the offshore rips where the currents converge. That's where the carcasses will pile up--a fact we learned during the Exxon Valdez spill. Maybe that's another reason for BP's "no camera" policy and the flight restrictions.

On Saturday June 12, people across America will stand up and speak out with one voice to protest BP's treatment of the Gulf, neglect for the response workers, and their response to government authority. President Obama needs to hear and see the people waving cameras and respirators. Until the media is allowed unrestricted access to the Gulf and impacted beaches, BP - not the President of United States - will remain in charge of the Gulf response.

For more information on community rallies, please visit HERE.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/riki-ott/from-the-ground-bp-censor_b_608724.html
 
Obama Compares Gulf Oil Spill To 9/11

http://www.infowars.com/obama-compares-gulf-oil-spill-to-911-tragedy/

In an interview with Politico News outlet last Friday President Obama compared the recent incident in the Gulf of Mexico to the tragic 9/11 attack of 2001. With the stern conviction of a “world government” advocate, President Obama stated

“In the same way that our view of our vulnerabilities and our foreign policy was shaped profoundly by 9/11, I think this disaster is going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come.”

Or so he and many others advocating for Climate Change legislation hope. It seems that the words of Rahm Immanuel are once again in vogue with the administration, as we see an opportunity for our UN -loyal leaders to use this “crisis” to push for a Climate Change Bill in the Senate. And just in case you forgot the classic words of Rahm Immanuel during the economic crisis recently, here is what he said:

“Never let a serious crisis go to waste.. What I mean by that is, it’s a good opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before”.

Now whether or not you believe the oil spill in the Gulf was due to negligence, or as some speculate, a contrive event -one thing is clear- and that is our current Dictator in Chief and his cronies will certainly play the “crisis” fiddle for all it’s worth.

In the aftermath of 9/11, George Bush signed the Patriot Act into law under the pretense of protecting America against terrorism, and it looks as though Obama is playing the same Problem -Reaction -Solution game in this case as well. Why else would the cleanup efforts be taking so long? Why does the daily news agencies remind us constantly of the number of days it’s been since the accident first happened? And why has the White House along with BP rejected cleanup technologies that could have been on sight only days after the spill?


Well, as my school teachers taught me long ago, repitition is what causes us to learn best. By the time the next Climate Change Summit meeting comes around, the mind control media will have etched the oil spill propaganda into the minds of all the Americans, who will then call upon the White House and the global community to impose Carbon Taxes and clean air legislation for our “protection”!

Last year the House of Representatives passed a climate bill with a vote of 219 for, 212 against. Now Obama is hoping for a victory in the Senate. On May 12,Skull and Bonesman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones Senator John kerry, D-Mass., and Joe. Lieberman, I-Conn., introduced the 987 page “American Power Act” without their GOP colleague, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, whose support was considered crucial for its passage.

Senator Kerry wants us to believe this devastating bill will somehow help to bolster the economy and create jobs saying in a statement on the Kerry.Senate.gov site:

The tragedy in the Gulf underscores why we need to change America’s energy future – today. We can’t afford to wait. Transitioning to new energy sources will jumpstart our economy, safeguard our national security, and protect our environment. We can reclaim our leadership of the global green economy, and stop sending a billion dollars a day overseas for our oil while we’re at it.

But according to Nicolas D. Loris of The Heritage Foundation, this bill will “wreak economic havoc” and “kill jobs”. He also argues that the Kerry-Leiberman Bill will protect large corporations at the expense of consumers, with minimal effect on temperatures.

In the same article Nicolas stated:

The purpose of the bill is to drive energy prices high enough to reduce consumption. In effect, consumers would be forced to pay more for less energy. Higher energy costs would spread throughout the economy as producers try to cover their rising production costs by hiking their product prices.

Kerry-Lieberman attempts to shield the economic pain from consumers by passing two-thirds of the revenue it raises back to the consumer through energy discounts or direct rebates. Yet this clearly wouldn’t compensate for all of the rising costs that occur throughout the economy, thanks to higher energy prices.

Higher prices lower consumer demand, and the lower demand prevents higher prices from completely offsetting production cost increases. As a result, businesses must cut production, cut jobs – or both.

President Obama and his Politburo know that the American people are waking up to the “Global Warming/Climate Change” lie fostered by globalists such as Al Gore and Maurice Strong (among others), so now they must resort to more fear tactics and 9/11 “type” images of catastrophic demension in order to convince the public that carbon dioxide is a pollutant! (Tell that to the plants and see if they are convinced).

The globalists are getting nervous because, as Zbigniew Brzezsinski recently stated in a speech to his CFR cronies,

“for the first time, in all of human history, mankind is politically awakened. That’s a total new reality … it has not been so for most of human history until the last one hundred years … and in the course of the last one hundred years, the whole world has become politically awakened. And no matter where you go, politics is a matter of social engagement, and most people know what is generally going on..”

He also stated that because of a “diversified global leadership” and a “politically awakened” people globally, their plans for a world order are becoming far more difficult to establish.

The truth, however, about the comparisons being made between the attack on September 11, of 2001 and the Gulf Oil Spill of April 20, 2010 is simply this – both of their years have 2’s,0’s and 1’s in them – and that’s about their only similarities.
 
*TRUE* Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what is for dinner....
Good one.

Socialism works great.....until you run out of the other guy's money. Not mine saying.
 
Now they are saying 2.52 million gallons of oil per day is what is going into the Gulf, and over 119 million gallons total so far.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gulf_oil_spill_flow

I strongly suspect that even that figure is very low. Heck, I caught a post somewhere that suggested that even the "live" feed that BP is supplying is no such thing at all. That's the problem with lying. Once caught, everything else you say is suspect....
 
So here's a question that I have been pondering lately. What should we (meaning anyone who is close to ground zero) be using as an indicator of the "canary in the mine"? I'm really hoping that some of the predictions I read about dire consequences stemming from this event are WAY off base, but what if they are not? Without trust in the government, and having to rely completely on instinct and reading whatever signs between the lines that I can catch wind of makes me feel like I am walking a very thin line between wanting to run like hell for the hills NOW, or just sticking my head in the sand and blot this all completely out of my mind.
 
So here's a question that I have been pondering lately. What should we (meaning anyone who is close to ground zero) be using as an indicator of the "canary in the mine"? I'm really hoping that some of the predictions I read about dire consequences stemming from this event are WAY off base, but what if they are not? Without trust in the government, and having to rely completely on instinct and reading whatever signs between the lines that I can catch wind of makes me feel like I am walking a very thin line between wanting to run like hell for the hills NOW, or just sticking my head in the sand and blot this all completely out of my mind.

I hear you loud and clear. I'm stressing out over this whole thing. The government is a bunch of liers sticking up for the oil company's. So what are we supposed to believe??? I wish I had the answer.

Before this is over, it will be the biggest oil spill in the history of the world. We are going to pass the second worst in just a few days. I posted the top 10 oil disasters on the first page of this thread.
 
Now they are saying 2.52 million gallons of oil per day is what is going into the Gulf, and over 119 million gallons total so far.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gulf_oil_spill_flow

I strongly suspect that even that figure is very low. Heck, I caught a post somewhere that suggested that even the "live" feed that BP is supplying is no such thing at all. That's the problem with lying. Once caught, everything else you say is suspect....


I agree that figure is still BS, as experts suspected 4 million + gallons a day is pumping out.


So here's a question that I have been pondering lately. What should we (meaning anyone who is close to ground zero) be using as an indicator of the "canary in the mine"? I'm really hoping that some of the predictions I read about dire consequences stemming from this event are WAY off base, but what if they are not? Without trust in the government, and having to rely completely on instinct and reading whatever signs between the lines that I can catch wind of makes me feel like I am walking a very thin line between wanting to run like hell for the hills NOW, or just sticking my head in the sand and blot this all completely out of my mind.


Personally I would run like hell before FEMA steps in...




Check out this article!! :ack2:
http://www.standeyo.com/NEWS/10_USA/100614.diz.drills.througout.US.html


.
 
Last edited:
16 Burning Questions About The Gulf Of Mexico Oil Spill That We Deserve Some Answers To

The Gulf of Mexico oil spill is a national nightmare that seems to have no ending. Every day new details come out that are even more shocking than what we learned the day before. The truth is that life will never be the same in the Gulf of Mexico or for those who live along the Gulf coast. Now Barack Obama has made a big Oval Office speech and has tried to convince all of us that he is in charge of the crisis. Well, perhaps if he had tried to take decisive action a month ago the American people may have rallied around him. But right now the BP/government response to this disaster remains completely and totally chaotic. Nobody seems to be able to stop the leak, and BP has made the environmental nightmare far worse by dumping over a million gallons of highly toxic dispersants into the Gulf. U.S. government officials are running around holding press conferences and waiting for BP to do something. Meanwhile oil is pouring ashore and toxic gases are being detected at very alarming levels. The biggest environmental disaster in U.S. history is also quickly becoming one of the biggest economic disasters and potentially one of the biggest public health disasters.

The truth is that the American people deserve some answers about what in the world is going on down there in the Gulf. BP does not own the Gulf of Mexico and they have no right to keep the American people from seeing what is happening. There are some very serious health and environmental questions that have been raised in the media recently, but both BP and the U.S. government are not giving us any answers.

But we need some answers. People are getting sick. Crops are dying. Wildlife is being devastated. Birds are flocking north by the thousands.

But BP and the U.S. government continue to treat us as though we are on a "need to know" basis and that what we "need to know" is not much.

Actually, much of what they have decided to tell us throughout this crisis has turned out to be lies anyway.

The truth is that it is about darn time that someone started telling it to us straight.

The following are 16 questions about the Gulf of Mexico oil spill that we really need some answers to....

#1) Barack Obama has authorized the deployment of more than 17,000 National Guard members along the Gulf coast to be used "as needed" by state governors. So what are all of these National Guard troops going to be doing exactly? Are the troops going to be used to stop the oil or to control the public?

#2) Barack Obama has also announced the creation of a "Gulf recovery czar" who will be in charge of overseeing the restoration of the Gulf of Mexico region following the oil spill. So is appointing a "czar" Obama's idea of taking charge of a situation?

#3) Because it is so incredibly toxic, the UK's Marine Management Organization has completely banned Corexit 9500, so if there was a major oil spill in the UK's North Sea, BP would not be able to use it. So why is BP being allowed to use Corexit 9500 in the Gulf of Mexico?

#4) It is being reported that 2.61 parts per million of Corexit 9500 (mixed with oil at a ratio of 1:1o) is lethal to 50% of fish exposed to it within 96 hours. That means that 1 gallon of Corexit 9500/oil mixture is capable of rendering 383,141 gallons of water highly toxic to fish. So why was BP allowed to dump 1,021,000 gallons of Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527 into the Gulf of Mexico, and why aren't they being stopped from dumping another 805,000 gallons of these dispersants that they have on order into the Gulf?

#5) If these dispersants are so incredibly toxic to fish, what are they going to do to crops? What are they going to do to people?

#6) If the smell of the oil on some Gulf beaches is already so strong that it burns your nostrils, then what in the world is this oil doing to to wildlife that encounter it?

#7) Is it a bad sign that birds from the Gulf region are flocking north by the thousands?

#8) Why is BP being allowed to use private security contractors to keep the American people away from the oil cleanup sites?

#9) Why is BP openly attempting to manipulate the search results on sites like Google and Yahoo?

#10) Why has the FAA shut down the airspace above the Gulf of Mexico oil spill? What don't they want the American people to see?

#11) Senator Bill Nelson of Florida says that there are reports that there are additional ruptures in the sea floor from which oil is leaking. If there are quite a few of these additional ruptures, then how in the world does BP expect to completely stop this oil leak?

#12) Why are scientists finding concentrations of methane at up to 10,000 times normal background levels in Gulf waters?

#13) At some testing stations in the Gulf of Mexico, levels of benzene have been detected at over 3000 parts per billion, and levels of hydrogen sulfide have been detected as high as 1192 parts per billion. Considering that these levels would be highly toxic to humans, why hasn't the general public been warned?

#14) Why are so many Gulf oil spill disaster workers showing up at local hospitals complaining of a "mysterious illness"?

#15) If "70% or 80%" of the protective booms are doing absolutely nothing at all to stop the oil, then what is going to stop the millions of gallons of oil in the Gulf from eventually reaching shore?

#16) It is being reported that the deepsea oil plumes are creating huge "dead zones" where all creatures are dying as they are deprived of oxygen. If this oil spill continues to grow could the vast majority of the Gulf of Mexico become one gigantic "dead zone"?

***UPDATE***

A reader named Stacy has posted a very alarming comment regarding what is happening in her area down in Florida that we wanted to share with everyone....

We live in the navarre, florida area and in the past week almost every family we know has had vomiting and diarreha. This could just be anecdotal – maybe we just have a stomach bug circulating, but it is strange. We had a huge storm the week before it happened that blew in from the gulf so who knows.

Also, the city of destin, florida has taken it upon themselves to close the destin pass with their own purchased boom and barges. This is an elite destination and they are not waiting around for bp and their hired prison workers to clean the beaches. Apparently, the coast guard was at the meeting and told the locals that they will face criminal prosecution, but they don’t care. They are protecting their million dollar properties.
 
Science Advisor Richard C. Warns that an even worse catastrophe could be looming. A giant gas bubble has formed at the site of the leak on the ocean floor.

If it explodes thousands of workers on the ships in the gulf will be lost . This is a catastrophe in the making. Get ready for mass evacuations soon.

 
Back
Top