• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Gulf of Mexico oil geyser

That so called leaked video could not have come from the Gulf of Mexico. Note the extensive desert, and the fact that the oil seems not to have come from the ocean, but from a leaking well on land. This is probably old footage of the destroyed wells in the Middle East following Operation Desert Storm.
 
BP caught lying, imagine that.

BP caught using altered image of command center

rsz_fakefakehive_houston-2.jpg


real_HIVE_houston01375.jpg



two links below

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upsho...-caught-using-altered-image-of-command-center

http://www.americablog.com/2010/07/bp-photoshops-fake-photo-of-command.html
 
Oil lies becoming more preposterous

John Kaminski – via Rebel News July 20, 2010


They lied about what happened on 9/11/2001. They lied about the need to make war on Iraq. They lied about the reasons they started bombing Afghanistan.

So I guess we should not be surprised that they have lied every day about the profound defacement using an out-of-control oil well to destroy the Gulf of Mexico.

But now the lies are beginning More to catch up with them. Even the dullest of American minds is beginning to understand that the so-called facts being spouted by the corporate-kept, Jewish-owned mainstream media are becoming more preposterous.

Most Americans can't comprehend the technological terms that have been used throughout this ugly episode of lying by almost everyone involved - the U.S. government, British Petroleum, and the major media.

But fortunately, experts are stepping forward. Mainstream media have pretty much ignored the claims recently made by oil industry insider Matt Simmons that the main leak of the so-called volcano was not the device so often pictured on network TV, because the diameter of that pipe was not large enough to account for the volume of oil observed in the Gulf by satellites of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration.

The best CNN could do July 19 was to report that government and BP spokespeople were admitting that other leaks in the seafloor were appearing in other locations than the so-called riser pipe, perhaps as a way to deflect attention from Simmons' assessment that officials were covering up both the location and the volume of the main leak that has now poisoned the entire Gulf of Mexico.

But now geologist Chris Landau has blown the lid off the whole tragic charade that has been cynically carried on by BP, President Obama and the various functionaries who have been paraded before the cameras to parrot oil industry misinformation.

Landau, who has been critically commenting on the whole sorry episode throughout this 3-month ordeal that threatens the health of the entire world, has enumerated a whole list of reasons as to why the government's story cannot possibly be true.

The most egregious lie, according to this veteran oil industry watcher, is the constant images put forth on television which show a pipe burbling some substance into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. It looks like an overworked water bubbler in a public park, emitting a substance of changing colors that floats with a moderately effervescent turbulence toward the surface.

However, news reports have quoted various BP and government officials as saying that extreme pressures from the wellhead are what caused the oil rig to explode and the leak to remain unplugged for three months.

Landau isn't believing any of it.

"I have worked with air, steam, and hydraulic leaks up to the 4,500 PSI (pounds per square inch) range," Landau wrote. "They were claiming wellhead pressures of up to 70,000 to 100,000 pounds per square inch.

Now, they are claiming pressures of 6.5-7K PSI."

Landau writes: "From personal observations, I can tell you that 600 PSI, it'll cut you in half. Hydraulic fluid at 3,000 PSI vaporizes when a line bursts.

"Now, can you correlate those facts with the images being shown on MSM of a lazy burbling fountain of oil lazily coming out of a 14" diameter pipe, when the pressure indications would indicate something in the nature of a Saturn rocket booster engine?"

He said the oil leak, if they're claiming 100,000 pounds per square inch as the reason for the disaster, should look like the most colossal rocket engine exhaust we have ever sent into space!!!

Is this not more verification of what oil expert Matt Simmons said is "the biggest lie of all time"?

And that's not all.

"The video of the pressure gauges is interesting," Landau writes, adding "not for what the gauge itself reads, but for the fact that crush depth for a modern nuclear submarine is somewhere around 1,200 ft.

"How do they keep the gauges from crushing in at 5,000 feet?" he asks, fuming.

And if all that's not bad enough, Landau notes:

"Since when do you have a blue background in videos taken at 5,000 feet? Some shown have had them."

Is this not proof positive that the whole pathetic presentation by BP and the U.S. government is a pathetic hoax? Yet who in that sorry day and age, can arrest our own criminal government, which is not only waging unjust wars against innocent people around the world, but now is complicit up to its eyeballs in trying to kill its own people and destroy the entire Gulf of Mexico?

Since the U.S. government shows no signs of trying to act honestly through this horrifying debacle, perhaps it is approaching the time another country, or a collection of other countries, might have to step in to save the environmental health of the world from the Jewish-controlled monster called the USA.

Watch Landau's video and then try to figure out what we as Americans can do with a government in charge of a law enforcement and military apparatus that is clearly complicit in a horrible scheme to kill millions of people.

The read Landau's latest article: "BP Well Should Not be Pressure Tested": www.opednews.com/articles/BP-Blown-out-well-should-n-by-Chris-Landau-100714-978.html

In other oil disaster news, numerous officials are talking about methane seepage near the riser that is being watched on television.

See those numerous reports at www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/

Perhaps these reports are an attempt to deflect attention from Matt Simmons' assertion yesterday that a giant hole perhaps ten miles away from the center of everyone's attention is what is really responsible for the continuing fouling of the Gulf. Simmons estimates that gaping hole in the Gulf floor is what is really responsible for the 120,000 BARRELS per day that continues to flow into the ocean. The U.S. Coast Guard continues to remain silent about these methane reports, despite numerous stories about "mystery seepage" near the wellbore.

Perhaps the most sensational story of the day came from a source of debatable credibility, the Drudge Report, that said the methane levels now being seen in the Gulf have only been previously conjectured as happening during mass extinction events, a comment made by oceanographer John Kessler of Texas A&M University. You can read that on floridaoilspilllaw.com.

And in a development late in the day July 19, the Associated Press was reporting that oil and gas were leaking from the new cap on BP's ruptured oil well, but retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, still serving as the point person for BP and the U.S. government's cynical spin machine, said Monday afternoon that the leaks are so far not a major concern, while mentioning nothing about methane or Simmons' contention that the real source of the leak was being hidden by BP.

John Kaminski is a writer who formerly lived on the Gulf Coast of Florida who is now a thousand miles away and now has no plans to ever return there.
Source: www.rebelnews.org/opinion/environment/314635a

..............................................................





And we are being lied to go to war with Iran.

:angry:
 
Yeah, the local newspaper here is acting like the crisis is over with, and everyone can return to normal. Yeah man, come on down to Florida to get your late season beach vacation right now! Spend your money, the coast is clear (literally)....

But where is all the oil? It hasn't all sunk to the bottom of the Gulf, otherwise the well head itself would be under a thick layer of it. People are saying that little is visible on the surface of the Gulf of Mexico. Conservative estimates are saying 180 MILLION gallons (which is probably low by a substantial margin based on all the lies BP has been caught in) of oil leaked out of that well. And how much dispersant was sprayed into that leaking oil as well? We are talking about a substantial amount of oil and chemicals let loose in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico for several MONTHS.

I read an article in the newspaper claiming that the oil did not get into the loop current taking it around the eastern coast of Florida into the Atlantic.

So where IS all that oil right now? I've heard the old saying "Out of sight, out of mind", but this is ridiculous.....
 
Anyone up for a swim in the Gulf? :ack2:





Another interesting read.....

USF says government tried to squelch their oil plume findings

By Craig Pittman, Times Staff Writer
In Print: Tuesday, August 10, 2010


A month after the Deepwater Horizon disaster began, scientists from the University of South Florida made a startling announcement. They had found signs that the oil spewing from the well had formed a 6-mile-wide plume snaking along in the deepest recesses of the gulf.

The reaction that USF announcement received from the Coast Guard and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the federal agencies that sponsored their research:

Shut up.

"I got lambasted by the Coast Guard and NOAA when we said there was undersea oil," USF marine sciences dean William Hogarth said. Some officials even told him to retract USF's public announcement, he said, comparing it to being "beat up" by federal officials.

The USF scientists weren't alone. Vernon Asper, an oceanographer at the University of Southern Mississippi, was part of a similar effort that met with a similar reaction. "We expected that NOAA would be pleased because we found something very, very interesting," Asper said. "NOAA instead responded by trying to discredit us. It was just a shock to us."

NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco, in comments she made to reporters in May, expressed strong skepticism about the existence of undersea oil plumes — as did BP's then-CEO, Tony Hayward.

"She basically called us inept idiots," Asper said. "We took that very personally."

Lubchenco confirmed Monday that her agency told USF and other academic institutions involved in the study of undersea plumes that they should hold off talking so openly about it. "What we asked for, was for people to stop speculating before they had a chance to analyze what they were finding," Lubchenco said. "We think that's in everybody's interest. … We just wanted to try to make sure that we knew something before we speculated about it."

"We had solid evidence, rock solid," Asper said. "We weren't speculating." If he had to do it over again, he said, he'd do it all exactly the same way, despite Lubchenco's ire.

Coast Guard officials did not respond to a request for comment on Hogarth's accusation.

The discovery of multiple undersea plumes of oil droplets was eventually verified by one of NOAA's own research vessels. And last month USF scientists announced they at last could match the oil droplets in the undersea plumes to the millions of barrels of oil that gushed from the collapsed well until it was capped July 15.

"What we have learned completely changes the idea of what an oil spill is," USF scientist David Hollander said then. "It has gone from a two-dimensional disaster to a three-dimensional catastrophe."

Now Lubchenco is not only convinced the undersea plumes exist, but she is predicting that some of the spill's most significant impacts will be caused by their effect on juvenile sea creatures such as bluefin tuna. Lubchenco and her staff say they are now working smoothly with USF and other academic institutions in investigating the consequences of the largest marine oil spill in history.

However, Hogarth said, not all is hunky-dory.

USF's first NOAA-sponsored voyage to take samples after Deepwater Horizon, the one that turned up evidence of the undersea plumes, was designed to gather evidence for use in an eventual court case against BP and other oil companies involved in the disaster. At the end of the voyage, USF turned its samples over to NOAA, expecting to get either a shared analysis or the samples themselves back. So far, Hogarth said, they've received neither.

NOAA's top oil spill scientist, Steve Murawski, said Monday that he was "sure we will release the data" at some point. However, he said, because NOAA has collected so many samples over the past three months, when it comes to the samples from USF's trip in May, "I'm not sure where they are."

Lubchenco's agency came under fire last week for a new report that said "the vast majority" of the oil from Deepwater Horizon had been taken care of. Scientists who read the report closely said it actually said half the oil was still unaccounted for.

Lubchenco said anyone who read the report as saying the oil was gone read it wrong.

"Out of sight and diluted does not mean benign," she said.

SOURCE: http://www.tampabay.com/news/enviro...d-to-squelch-their-oil-plume-findings/1114225
 
As soon as I started seeing the "Where is all the oil?" headlines in the news I knew the coverup had begun.
The media, I'm sure as a result of government as well as corporate pressure is attempting to lead the American sheeple into believing that all the uproar of the last 3 months is unfounded and there really is no big problem.
Sad how soon the masses forget and how eagerly they devour whatever they are spoonfed by the media machine.
 
Anyone up for a swim in the Gulf?

I think I'm going to order one of those suits they wear at the nuclear power plants. As soon as I get it I will meet you at the beach. Hey, I won't have to worry about sun block.

And just think, with all the dead sea life on the beach, it will be like an all you can eat sushi bar, so come hungry.
 
I think at this point a lot of people have to be thinking, "Of what use is a government that doesn't step in to protect the public when something like this happens?"

Which then eventually leads to the thought, "Of what use is a government that outright LIES to the people it is supposed to protect, when those lies can cause harm to those very same people?"

Obviously they have forgotten why they are in office..... It is NOT to protect the value of their oil stocks. :NoNo:
 
Back
Top