• In the past two days I have gotten emails asking about being requested to provide credit card info in order to register and also to make a post in the classifieds forums. PLEASE NOTE: In no instance will this site ask you for this sort of information. The only time any request for payment is made is if you choose to opt-in for a higher membership level, and that is done SOLELY through PayPal. Anything else is coming from a source other than this site. My guess is that this is coming through Google Adsense, but when I can get someone to send me a screen shot of this sort of request, I will know more.
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Herptiles Killed by Automobiles

Martin Nowak

Martin's Snakes
Joined
Mar 23, 2018
Messages
259
Reaction score
54
Points
28
Location
Trussville, AL
Herptiles Killed by Automobiles and Human Death and Injury from Animal Collisions

Reptiles (and other animals) killed by automobiles were the feature story in “Inside Climate News – Today’s Climate” on September 24, 2024. The story linked to other reports and also focused on human injury and death as a result of such collisions. The subtitle is: “Wildlife Crossings Can Help Prevent Collisions—If They Are in the Right Place”. The gist of the story is that climate change is causing animals to move around more thus causing increasing deaths of the animals by automobiles. I won’t get into the "climate change and don’t drive" discussions – the point here is again – reptile keepers need to be armed and knowledgeable about the media’s distortion of facts.


Two points in posting on FC are:
1. Information about automobiles killing reptiles.
2. The disconnect of number and costs of human injury / fatality by collisions with mammals versus that of venomous snakebite – i.e. the disproportionate emphasis on reptiles (especially snakes) versus mammals.

The first link in the article is: “Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Reduction Study: Report to Congress”. This report was written in August 2008. At the bottom of the page in small print is noted “This page last modified on 03/08/2016”. Modifications are not indicated. The author therefore uses data which is from 8 – 16 years old. Nevertheless, this report covers relevant topics and solutions to reduce car-animal collisions.

Reptiles / herptiles listed include: American crocodile, desert tortoise, gopher tortoise, Alabama red-bellied turtle, bog turtle, copperbelly water snake, eastern indigo snake, California tiger salamander, flatwoods salamander, and Houston toad.

Conclusions of the report include:
1. 26,000 human injuries per year from collisions
2. 200 human deaths per year from collisions
3. Total annual cost of collisions = $8,388,000,000

It seems unlikely herptiles caused very much injury or death from automobile collisions. Certainly, injury, death, and costs of venomous snakebite are but a tiny fraction in comparison. The average per incident cost of snakebite is higher than the average per incident cost of mammal collisions. But like mammal collisions with average citizens, the vast majority of snakebites occur to non-reptile keepers. Still, the number of mammalian collisions causing harm, death, costs far exceeds the same from venomous snakebite.

The second link in Today’s Climate News is from VOX titled “How cars ruin wild animals’ lives – If you love nature, consider not driving in it”. September 12, 2023.

Readers will arrive at their own judgements about this story. For me, much of it is sensationalized narrative within a context of some factual foundation. One interesting aspect is the author’s discussion that EVs will cause increased collisions because they are quieter. The central point of this story is to create more road crossings for animals which seems quite reasonable and has been shown to be effective.

How road crossings might save herptiles is a different question and not addressed.
 
Back
Top