• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....
Heykid said:
Haha :D no I really am sorry....The thread really made it sound like it was the other David/Damon person. I thought I was so cool, and that I had found something great.....I guess I'm not such a great sleuth-er after all. :dunce:

You did do something great.
You proved that those animals were with Dave L.
So its either David B was lying about Beau lewis offering those animals to him.
Or Beau lewis tried to doop (sp?) David B into buying animals that belonged to someone else and were not for sale.



On to Damon.
Nothing against him except for
1. threatening people.
2. pretending to be someone else.
3. doctoring his pics (remember the miniature dollar bill next to his "big" snake)
4. pretending to be bigger than he really is.

on to David.
Nothing against him except
1. doctoring pics.
2. Claiming to have certain animals which he does not.
3. lying about his projects (when clearly it is the same female snake with two different males in a two month time frame)
4. pretending to be bigger than he really is.
5. then there is the.............if he truly is damon....then I do not like the lying about his true identity.
6. saying brokering animals is wrong.....when he does it himself.
7. the lies lies lies.
 
Just figured I would throw this out there.

Who knows how many pages back now as fast as post are going up on here, but there was the picture of a tiger that Brian/Damon ect had back in the day, and Davids tiger eating that had the same pattern. This picture also looks similar to the tiger (if not the same) on his recent additions page, so isnt it possible that he purchased it from someone who purchased it from him?

After all in February last year on my way back from the Berks show I took a side trip to the middle of New Jersey to pick up a ball python from this kid Sean who was running "Seans Reptile Rescue." He had gotten the snake from someone in his area and I won it off of Reptile auctions as a gift for my friends almost 2 year old(obliviously almost three now, and a great future herper), as his first snake(got to start them early lol). It was a 66% het albino produced by CV Exotics in New hampshire. When I got home I noticed the original purchase date in 2001, and it was bought by a friend of mine here in CT with his name on the paperwork and everything. What are the chances of that??? That snake has been through several states, and I only talk to 3 or 4 herp people in all of CT, and one of them owned it 5 years ago. Just goes to show you how small the herp world can be. This is strictly an objective opinion, nothing more, nothing less, but nothing is ever certain, so I wish everyone would stop jumping to conclusions.

Also to those earlier who thought I was lying when I said I couldnt recognize that photo...is Jim Mason lying too?? Why has no one given him a hard time, I understand he has more clout than me, hands down, but as a human being I deserve the same respect, as I have never done anyone on here any wrong, ever. I remember Bobby saying something to this effect and the post #'s are #118 and #123, and not sure if anyone else had said something to that effect, but maybe now at least you realize that I am not alone on this, that picture is just way to unclear to draw any real conclusion from.

And to Jim from our early talking when I said that no matter what the answers people would continue the mob quest...a customer of Dave's from 04 comes forward when Damon was still around and still Damon, yet the attack continues that they are the same person, and no matter how good you are you cant be two different people in two different states at the same time, so exactly as I said, nothing will satisfy. Anyway as always everyone take care and have fun with the witch hunt, best of luck. Dan M. ( I know I said I was going to stay away, but this is just all to funny to watch adults act like children, cant resist to get in on the childness of it all just a little bit :) .
 
As for the 2 males with same female...

Ritchie Luna said:
You did do something great.
You proved that those animals were with Dave L.
So its either David B was lying about Beau lewis offering those animals to him.
Or Beau lewis tried to doop (sp?) David B into buying animals that belonged to someone else and were not for sale.



On to Damon.
Nothing against him except for
1. threatening people.
2. pretending to be someone else.
3. doctoring his pics (remember the miniature dollar bill next to his "big" snake)
4. pretending to be bigger than he really is.

on to David.
Nothing against him except
1. doctoring pics.
2. Claiming to have certain animals which he does not.
3. lying about his projects (when clearly it is the same female snake with two different males in a two month time frame)
4. pretending to be bigger than he really is.
5. then there is the.............if he truly is damon....then I do not like the lying about his true identity.
6. saying brokering animals is wrong.....when he does it himself.
7. the lies lies lies.

That is a common breeding practice for some people. In case one does not get the job done by rotating males your chances of getting eggs are that much better. When the babies hatch it would be painstakingly clear which snakes was the father, bateaters dont look at all like rock/burm hybrids. Not trying to discredit, but that cant be taken as a lie, it is very possible, as a breeder friend of mine does it every year and it has always paid off in the end. I am really gone this time, really lol. By the way Ritchie as much as you are on the witch hunt as well, at least your are being courteous and fairly objective, of everyone I think you have been very fair and taken in all info and adjusting accordingly, again sorry for butting heads 800 post ago lol, you are being fair. Take care Ritchie and all, Dan M.
 
Cat_72 said:
Since when do pigs have long, black, fuzzy ears?

That sure looks like a bunny ear to me. :shrug01:

12-11Batch1270.jpg


Here's a pig with long brown fuzzy ears.

4.jpg


Griz said:
James, it's been awhile since I have seen comments that assinine. Let me sum up my stance...... You cannot find the evidence just like a bank robber cannot find a cop. Absolutely pathetic reasoning skills.....

Griz
__________________

Bob, you asked me a yes or no question of opinion and your mad at me for answering it? You're going to have to be more specific as to what in particular that I said was asinine or poorly thought out. When you and I have spoken in the past you struck me as a pretty decent guy; someone that would be above this kind of playground nonsense... what gives? Ritchie and I have managed to disagree without resorting to calling one another names. I just don't get it.
 
dutchallison00 said:
Bob, you asked me a yes or no question of opinion and your mad at me for answering it? You're going to have to be more specific as to what in particular that I said was asinine or poorly thought out. When you and I have spoken in the past you struck me as a pretty decent guy; someone that would be above this kind of playground nonsense... what gives? Ritchie and I have managed to disagree without resorting to calling one another names. I just don't get it.

James, I never called you names. I simply implied that your reasoning skills are lacking. The simple fact that you can set aside all of the information in this thread and still vote him as a good guy is beyond reasoning. Time and time again it has been PROVEN that David has doctored photo's etc etc etc and yet you still fail to see the logic behind this "playground nonsense."

Your words, your vote, has the ability to steer someone towards doing business with David/Damon whatever. Even with all of the information provided in this thread you are still 100% on the side of David. That is what puzzles me and THAT is what I am saying is assinine.

I will not discredit your own experience with David. To do so would be unreasonable. You've been happy with your transaction with David and that's not without merit. But to so blindly believe your "experience" in lieu of all of the information provided here is foolishness. Plain and simple.

Griz
 
I just cant resist temptation...

Anyway I'd like to make a point to all those who are upset about the "doctoring of photos". To the girls who responded- do you wear make-up? All that is is making yourself look like something your not to sell yourself as something better, is it not? Or cleaning your house right before company instead of letting them see who you really are and how you really live. Dressing up to go out so you look better or wearing tighter clothes to appear thinner, we wont even touch plastic/cosmetic surgery, and all the age defying creams, these are all things people do that is essentially lying and thats all ok, but to sharpen an image a bit, or have artificail lighting, or a little extra flash and not tell the whole world is just unacceptable. We often forget how dishonest even the most of honest of us are. There are a lot of stones being thrown, and I think a lot of broken glass if you know what I am getting at.

James(Dutchallison00), as Bob said you need to protect people from buying from a company with a 100 percent positive feedback and absolutely not one sick/dead animal or complaint. The closest thing to a complaint is Jim Mason, but the sale itself went fairly smooth, just feels his animals have been misrepresented upon resale which is his feeling and his right to feel that way. Why would you want someone to buy from a company with all happy customers who have actually done business with them, lengthy guarantees, and great healthy animals. Come on, think of the public for god sake!!!! LMFAO, this is beyond amusing, its unfortunate I have plans tonight, would love to cook dinner relax and stay here in Never Never land where we never have to grow up. Have a good night all, Dan M. Oh and by the way GO SAINTS!!!!!!! My home state is about to do it finally, I have complete faith.
 
fuscusking13 said:
Anyway I'd like to make a point to all those who are upset about the "doctoring of photos". To the girls who responded- do you wear make-up? All that is is making yourself look like something your not to sell yourself as something better, is it not? Or cleaning your house right before company instead of letting them see who you really are and how you really live. Dressing up to go out so you look better or wearing tighter clothes to appear thinner, we wont even touch plastic/cosmetic surgery, and all the age defying creams, these are all things people do that is essentially lying and thats all ok, but to sharpen an image a bit, or have artificail lighting, or a little extra flash and not tell the whole world is just unacceptable. We often forget how dishonest even the most of honest of us are. There are a lot of stones being thrown, and I think a lot of broken glass if you know what I am getting at.
Dan, Dan, Dan.........you should have resisted. There are many of us who do not want or need make-up. Tighter cloths make us appear heavier not thinner. SO please don't even compare misrepresented photo's to women and men who wear make up, have plastic surgery, clean or don't clean their homes and get dressed up.
Artificial light is used for good quality, high resolution pictures. Those pix were photo shop enhanced....please resist temptation.......
 
You could not resist what? Acting stupid? Making a completely irrelevant comparison?

You've already shown your inability to make rational decisions so I guess flawed logic should come as no surprise. But then again, you know that David essentially has your collection in ransom so let's just say that your opinions, albeit completely biased, really does have much validity anymore.

Does anyone want to buy this darn piece of lint???

Griz
 
fuscusking13 said:
but to sharpen an image a bit, or have artificail lighting, or a little extra flash and not tell the whole world is just unacceptable. .

It's unacceptable when you claim it's the animals true colors, and they get even brighter as an adult.............. As for the rest of you're comparisons......idiotic!

-Wes Headley
 
How in the WORLD can you compare a little eye shadow to completely altering the TRUE apearance??? Ive showed you what those babies TRUELY look like and you say its just some artificial light or a flash making them NEON!!! How about that he says when you open that box and you look at those pictures that that snake is going to look 100% like the photo provided???? FINE you accept a liars word based on one supposed transaction....wheres your receipt??? You go buy one of his neon babies that originally gave from Jim and get out your video camera so we can see this neon snake AS you take it outta the box. Personally im not gonna throw my money away on an animal i could buy from Jim for a 3rd of the price and KNOW what im getting when i send him my money instead of a shitload of lies and deceit. HE HAS NO BAD OR GOOD deals because once the snake leaves his hand its not gonna resemble the one he just sold offline so since its not neon colored in person it couldnt possibly be one he sold there for leaving his record at 100% excellent deals.

JenJen

do i need to post emails of this guys backwoods thinking and comparisons????
 
a customer of Dave's from 04 comes forward when Damon was still around and still Damon, yet the attack continues that they are the same person, and no matter how good you are you cant be two different people in two different states at the same time, so exactly as I said, nothing will satisfy. Anyway as always everyone take care and have fun with the witch hunt, best of luck. Dan M.
WAOH !!! Hold on there young buck. Let me school you. I have been with fauna since about 1997. So i pretty much know how things work.

Damon was still Damon But he was doing a disappearing trick

Damon Posted his entire collection for sale on 5/15/2004
he supposedly sold EVERYTHING by 6/23/04

It has already been proven that he indeed did NOT sell everything. He lied. He was obviously up to something. Once he pretended to have sold everything....he was not spotted again until he was driving through Arizona in 2005. In other words, he was gone from about summer 2004 to summer 2005. Maybe I led you astray when I said David appeared a couple months after Damon disappeared. I should have said David appeared a couple months after Damon was finally spotted. NOONE heard from him until he was spotted in AZ. that is why people were laughing and where surprised he was around. Nothing in the reports in 2005 say that he was with family. but we all know Damon has Family. Do you think he may have moved his family ahead of time> or did he leave them? In other words it seems they have already been pre-moved to t he new place. So young buck it is possible he was moving his family in to the new place when he did the transaction with tenor goddess.

To the girls who responded- do you wear make-up? All that is is making yourself look like something your not to sell yourself as something better, is it not? Or cleaning your house right before company instead of letting them see who you really are and how you really live.
Damn, forgive him girls.....he is 22 ...he either thinks girls have cooties..... or he thinks they are for sale.
Dude so when girls put on make up...I should put a dollar bill into their pocket....proclaim them as having been bought by me.....then start humpin them like I want to against their will?

James(Dutchallison00), as Bob said you need to protect people from buying from a company with a 100 percent positive feedback and absolutely not one sick/dead animal or complaint.

Let me school you again YOUNG BUCK.

If I was a bad guy....lets say I cheated you and 100 other people.....then lets say I changed my name...then sold to 3-5 people. I now have 100% feed back on my new identity. should people try to warn you about my new identity with 100% feedback? or should they tell you that my new identity is 100% safe.

if this is Damon and get proven to be Damon..... why don't you ask him what happened to his other collection. What kind of Diseases ran through it and caused its demise. There is a reason why Damon is hiding. It isn't because of a witch hunt.

You need to read up on history before you cry witch hunt.
 
but to sharpen an image a bit, or have artificail lighting, or a little extra flash

Sharpening an image can be done with a sharpening tool. NOT the contrast tool that ads lots of red.

Artificial lighting does not add red.

extra flash washes out an animal...it does not add red.

damn....and I was accused of grasping at straws?
 
ok here is one for you in post number 389 benR posted a link to some of david's pics in the third one down if you want a size compairison there is a 2X4 on the top of the cage although the snake is a good size that is no 60 pound pig i have seen a 60 pound pig and that ain't it. sorry just adding a little food for thought.
 
fuscusking

daniel, let me help give you a little clue: money isn't the only thing that you are bad with! your rationalizations are just painful to read. have you ever heard the old adage about the fool who is 'too ignorant to realize just how ignorant he really is?' Somewhat apropos in your case, there little man.
 
a customer of Dave's from 04 comes forward when Damon was still around and still Damon, yet the attack continues that they are the same person, and no matter how good you are you cant be two different people in two different states at the same time, so exactly as I said, nothing will satisfy. Anyway as always everyone take care and have fun with the witch hunt, best of luck. Dan M.

Since Damon had a penchant for doing business under multiple aliases all along, whose to say WHEN he donned the David persona? He could have been doing business under that name concurrently with his actual identity as well as other aliases.

If, indeed, Damon is David, the fact that a customer has appeared from 04 really doesn't mean much.
 
fuscusking13 said:
Anyway I'd like to make a point to all those who are upset about the "doctoring of photos". To the girls who responded- do you wear make-up? All that is is making yourself look like something your not to sell yourself as something better, is it not? Or cleaning your house right before company instead of letting them see who you really are and how you really live. Dressing up to go out so you look better or wearing tighter clothes to appear thinner, we wont even touch plastic/cosmetic surgery, and all the age defying creams, these are all things people do that is essentially lying and thats all ok, but to sharpen an image a bit, or have artificail lighting, or a little extra flash and not tell the whole world is just unacceptable. We often forget how dishonest even the most of honest of us are. There are a lot of stones being thrown, and I think a lot of broken glass if you know what I am getting at.

James(Dutchallison00), as Bob said you need to protect people from buying from a company with a 100 percent positive feedback and absolutely not one sick/dead animal or complaint. The closest thing to a complaint is Jim Mason, but the sale itself went fairly smooth, just feels his animals have been misrepresented upon resale which is his feeling and his right to feel that way. Why would you want someone to buy from a company with all happy customers who have actually done business with them, lengthy guarantees, and great healthy animals. Come on, think of the public for god sake!!!! LMFAO, this is beyond amusing, its unfortunate I have plans tonight, would love to cook dinner relax and stay here in Never Never land where we never have to grow up. Have a good night all, Dan M. Oh and by the way GO SAINTS!!!!!!! My home state is about to do it finally, I have complete faith.
Griz, I think this first paragraph now qualifies as the most assinine reasoning in this thread, if not one of the top on the board, ever.

Dan... some of those photos were only brightened with artificial light and/or flash (making for bad pictures) and some were brightened with a program after the image was created. However, it is BLATANTLY obvious that many also had color change, and that is NOT acceptable, period! Why on earth would any seller WANT to do that? There is no way a buyer could be satisfied with a snake once received after seeing and believing it would look like the enhance version in the altered pictures. I read most of your posts and gave you the benefit of the doubt on most of them, but this... this is absolutely the most ignorant and assinine reasoning I've seen in a lonnnnnnng time. You lost all credibility with anyone who may have still been reading your posts with an open mind.

As was said, you should have resisted.
 
After Jim Mason did his deal in person With "David" from Highendherps he told me a little bit about what David looked like. As Jim said before, he was already onto who David really was before he met with him. So, he really tried to pay attention to details. After he e-mailed me the description I then forwarded this to the girl that had lived with Damon for about a week in California. I'll post the series of e-mails below and her reponse to them will be at the bottom.

1. Jim e-mailed me telling me about doing the deal with Highendherps

From: "Jim Mason" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hey Jim!
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:42:51 -0600
Ben,

Thought you'd be interested in knowing I met Mr David Beauchemin
today,lol. We met in Shreveport to give him the burms. Weird
looking dude,lol. Looked mixed Indian or mexican. Kinda tall and
skinny. But nice enough guy. then i talked with him onthe phone
tonight for about an hour. I will admit I was surprised that he
seems to be legit in what he knows,lol. We discussed burm health
and retics,etc. in a way it was kind of a relief to know he may
just be a compulsive strange dude, yet does know what he's doing at
least with the snakes,,lmao. Figured you'd find that funny and
interesting bro,lol.


2. I emailed him back and asked the following
From: "Ben Rogers" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hey Jim!
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:50:46 +0000
Did a yougish blonde girl happen to be
with him? Sounds like it may have been him. I gotta run right
now.
Later,
Ben


3. Jim e-mailed me and told me a little more about him.

From: "Jim Mason" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hey Jim!
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:01:31 -0600
He had a kind of rough looking face. Like indians/hispanics can have. like he had acne as a kid or something. Maybe he worked outside alot. Kind of a weathered looking face. Man, his hands were big and very rough looking. Like he worked(s) with his hands alot. he drove an older Ford duelley pickup,lol.


4. I emailed Becca to see what she thought of Jim's description. I have met Damon twice. Once in 02, and once in early 03. Other than remembering him being tall, dark hair, and skinny I couldn't remember much.
From: "Ben Rogers" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: RE: Hey Jim!
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:18:24 +0000
Hey Becca,
Does Jim's discription of Damon sound right to you? I can't hardly remember what he looked like.


5. Becca wrote me back and said the following.

From : Rebecca Jonilionis <[email protected]>
Sent : Monday, December 4, 2006 3:29 PM
To : [email protected]
Subject : Hey Jim!
Yep! That's definetely him! Truck and all! And yes... he does know a lot about caring for herps. It's the honesty and people skills he's got issues with!
 
fuscusking13 said:
Anyway I'd like to make a point to all those who are upset about the "doctoring of photos". To the girls who responded- do you wear make-up? All that is is making yourself look like something your not to sell yourself as something better, is it not? Or cleaning your house right before company instead of letting them see who you really are and how you really live. Dressing up to go out so you look better or wearing tighter clothes to appear thinner, we wont even touch plastic/cosmetic surgery, and all the age defying creams, these are all things people do that is essentially lying and thats all ok, but to sharpen an image a bit, or have artificail lighting, or a little extra flash and not tell the whole world is just unacceptable. We often forget how dishonest even the most of honest of us are. There are a lot of stones being thrown, and I think a lot of broken glass if you know what I am getting at.


I haven't taken issue with you in regards to your good experience with HEH. I will here. You are trying to rationalize doctoring pictures as something that is legitimate. It is not! Slim to no chance anyone would consider doing business with someone that believes this is an acceptable practice to sell an animal. Anyone that alters the appearance of their animal to make the sell has a serious character flaw. Just as anyone defending the practice. It is hard enough to determine the good guys to do business with online. We don't need people in this hobby defending deceptive practices.
 
Back
Top