I had a pastel male that wouldn't breed until he was 4 yrs old, though he'd been "of size" since his second winter (approx 18 months). Nothing to do but keep trying, or look for better one (no sense replacing, just for the sake of replacing).
As far as the inbreeding/line breeding thing - it has it's places - specifically, it is almost a required part of the process for proving out a new morph (including determining it's transmission); and, as mentioned, an occasional pairing to emphasize a certain trait. Unfortunately, too large a portion of the people utilizing the practice aren't really doing it for either of those purposes...they're doing it because they are too lazy, cheap, or short sighted to acquire unrelated animals.
Sure, it's convenient to pick up a pair of sibling hets to start a project, but why start out that way? Because getting an unrelated pair usually means a little more effort and money. Of course, the fact that some sellers won't release single females doesn't help...and the offering of the male for free seems (to some) too good a deal to pass.
Am I going to say that I have never purchased a pair of siblings - no. But I can say that I have never knowingly bred a sibling pair (buying from two separate sellers does not necessarily mean unrelated animals). If I buy sibling pairs, it is usually because the seller won't part with the single that I want...or because the one I don't "need" has a look that I particularly like; but, such a purchase inevitably leads to me acquiring another pair, or selling, trading, or giving the extra single away.
Can snakes endure a few generations of close breedings without physical manifestations? In most cases, yes...but that doesn't mean the practice should be the norm.