• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Is this site selling Accepted Certification of Good Guy Staus????

Glenn Bartley

Herper & Shootist
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Mineola, NY
Is it an ethical business practice to allow only those who have paid a higher fee to become certified as Good Guys or, does that hint of the possible future formation of a Good Old Boys Club. That would be the kind of club wherein if you line my pockets I’ll make you look good sort of thing. You know sort of like (but no where on the same level as) the crook who pays the cops not to look their way when they do bad. Ask the cop later on and he will swear he only knows that person as a decent, hard working certified good guy. Oh no wait a minute, there is another analogy that comes to mind, and it may better address this situation: the selling of indulgences by the Catholic Church. You could only be forgiven your sins at one point in time if you paid a fee to the church. Can you imagine that, in the eyes of the Church you were only a good guy, and only certified as such, if you paid. The more you paid, the more you could get away with and still be seen as a moral person. I wonder what the families of poor people thought? Heck I wonder what God had to say about that! (I hope that one is more to the point of this discussion.)

My guess is that a lot of paying members will be praising each other in order to promote one another as certified good guys. If you pay $25 you can actually become or be accepted as a certified good guy (does that mean you are not really a certified good guy but only accepted as one in the eyes of this site). I guess that means if you have not divvied up $25 then there is no way that your business practices or moral character could be seen as certifiably good by this site on the BOI's Good Guy Certification Forum. Very odd indeed, as it seems to defeat the whole ethical standard behind the BOI, and seems opposite of how a person of good business ethics would normally be chosen as such but, that is just my opinion.

I am not looking for an argument here, but rather for a decent level headed discussion as to the dilema I see in someone having to pay to become accepted as a Certified Good Guy. I would have thought your actions, morales, business ethics would have made you a good guy and that such should have been enough to earn you that reputation and any certification that goes along with it.

What do the rest of you, who are in any form of the herp business (large or small scale) think about this?

Best regards,
Glenn B
 
I hadn't really thought about it since I do not have a website (yet) and post items for sale thru the various for sale sections of other website forums but you do bring up a valid point.
If only people who pay a fee can be certified, does this open the door to unscrupulous people to be able to get the certification if they pay and have buddies vote for them?
To tell you the truth paying to get the banner does seem a bit odd but since anyone can vote on your status whether they are paying members or not, should keep the process in check. If you get negative votes against you, I don't think the membership fee will allow you to keep the banner.
I think it was just set up as another perk for paying members but they are ultimately at the hands of the customers since anyone can post a negative vote against them.
 
Glenn, you posed some interesting points. While I've read through the requirements for the certification, I didn't come away with the same interpretation as you did.

First of all, the $10 membership fee suffices in order to apply for the certificate, and Webslave explained that immediately. Secondly, applying doesn't automatically grant it:
This will be reflected in the poll set up in your thread here and by the votes people will place in your "Trader's Ratings". If at any time, one or both of those rating vehicles drops below zero (0) and you have a negative rating, your permission to display the provided certification banner will be withdrawn and you MUST remove it from your site immediately.
Since Webslave has never shown preferential treatment in suspending/fining/banning even those people who have paid money to have banners on this site, I don't believe there's much risk of anyone looking the other way if someone does bad business just because they're a member.

The other point that must be made is that there is some sort of fee associated with any sort of value rating in any industry: Good Housekeeping Seal requires an application and fee for your product to be evaluated; the Better Business Bureau requires membership in order to display their stickers; hotels and restaurants spend quite a chunk of change to be affiliated with a AAA rating, etc. etc. I work in the supplement industry, and my company pays beaucoup bucks to maintain their certifications; not that we BUY them, we absolutely must comply with the requirements of the certifying agencies, but we must remain members in good standing in order to qualify for evaluation, and that includes membership dues.

The key to a rating system like this issued by an organization is the validity of the issuing organization...in this case, FaunaClassifieds.
 
I saw on the membership fee list, you can only vote in polls about Certified Good Guys oif you piad the $10 fee, and you can only be accepted as a certified good guy if you pay $25. Maybe I read it wrong, but that is sure how it looks to me, or maybe it is a misprint.
 
Anyone interested in participating within this program must apply to me in order to do so. In doing so, they will have to agree to the stipulations of taking part in this plan without reservation. ONLY members in the merbership groups at the Contributor level and above are eligible to take part in this program. The reason for this is simple: It is going to take a substantial chunk of time and effort on my part to manage this process. I am trying hard to come up with programs to help clean up this industry, but I have to be realistic about what my time is worth to me and how I want to apply it.
$25.00yr - status = "Contributor"
all "+" bonus options included in levels 2 thru 3
+ Avatar maxed to 160x160 pixels and 40K
+ Private messages increased to 75 and can send to 10 recipients at a time.
+ access to view and post in the Steering Committee Meeting Room Forum
+ requests to change registered user name will be honored
+ Can view member info
+ Can use custom title
+ Can edit and delete posts in the general discussion forums.
+ Upload attachments (photos) increased to 10 meg
+ profile picture maxed to 160x160 pixels and 40K
You're correct, Glenn, I apologize.
 
There is a very simple answer, Glenn, for this stipulation of the certification being offered only to Contributor level members and above. This is going to be a lot of work for me. Setting it up has already been work, maintaining and monitoring it is going to be work, and when the inevitable problems arise from conflicts, arguments, and fraudulent activities, just WHO do you think is going to have to try to resolve it? Do you THINK maybe that will involve WORK as well? And I should do that all for FREE too?

Quite frankly, if someone is not willing to put $25 towards being a Contributor member here to help offset the work I am going to have to do for them and this project, then I don't need them to take part, and they will certainly live a long and fruitful live, as well, without out it.

Glenn, tell me, are you just intent on spreading your "sour grapes" attitude all over this site now? Yes, we disagree on my charging money for posting rights on various sections of this site. So now do you have the intention of digging into everything you can to try to kick up more discontent, arguments, and acrimony?

Don't you have something better to do with your time? If you don't like the way I am running this site now, then just leave. What is so tough about that? What are you trying to prove here?
 
I do not see this as a "Good Old Boys Club" at all. Or unethical. You act like everything should be free or it is unethical!!! That is just completely wrong. Free and/or paid has nothing to do with ethics.

A persons rating will be directly affected by their business dealings. Can they get friends to lie for them? Sure they can. Just like they can when someone asks for references, just like they can get friends to lie for them on the BOI. But if a person is a unethical business person then there will be enough negative feedback via the BOI, their Trader Rating and the Certified Good Guy board to expose them for what they are. They are all nothing more than just tools to be used to help consumers and businesses alike. You were fine with these tools when they were free, but now they are all conspiracys waiting to happen. I have enough faith in my fellow community members to KNOW that any abuse of this system will exposed in time. Just like it almost always has here.

You make it sound like all of us who have paid memberships are going to run around and lie for each other. I think that is just plain wrong to even insinuate Glenn. I think you have been here a long time and damn well know that a lot of the people here would not even begin to act in that way. The majority of the people who have paid memberships thus far are people just like you Glenn, that want only the best for this site and more importantly this industry. There is no way in hell they are going to lie for someone just because they too are paid members. Like I said that is just plain wrong to even insinuate that. Maybe you are not insinuating that, but it sure reads that way to me.

Also, at every turn I see you looking for controversy and conspiracy under every stone. Yeah I am well aware that there are plenty of dirt bags in this industry, but you seem to be pointing fingers at everyone who has made a paid membership. You don't find that unethical in its own right? Persecutions based on your theorys, not based on a single thread of fact? Unethical to say the least.
 
Glenn, you are in law enforcement, aren't you? Do you believe in what you do? Do you believe that the laws of this nation should be enforced? Do you believe that it is ethical for you to take a pay check doing what you are doing? Should it be a free service done by all wanting to enforce the laws or not be enforced at all if a paycheck is required by those enforcers? Why should you get paid to do what is right? You could do something else, you know?
 
Preferential treatment my left...

Take a look at my post count.

Take a look at my miniscule trader rating.

Take a look at my rep. point.

NOW look at my warning level.

If you're actually saying that I, capitol I there, would LIE for someone else, then you've got your head in a lightless orifice.

When my site, calkings.com, goes up in the next few weeks I'll have that little banner providing the folks here find me worthy of it. I expect NO ONE to lie for me. If I found out someone was trying to "help" me by being untruthful, I'd bring it out. I suspect I am not alone in this.

It's another way for good people to say "you're good people too".

It's another way for good people to say ''you're not worthy".

I wonder if you'd make the cut glenn.

There seems to have been a bcfos type of change in you recently. Is there something in your personal life that is affecting you to the point that you're pissing in your wheaties over here? I ask in all seriousness because in the past you were a different more likable guy.

Why all the negativity?
 
Sammy,

You act like everything should be free or it is unethical!!! That is just completely wrong. Free and/or paid has nothing to do with ethics.
What an, in my opinion, ignorant thing to say. Ignorant of my viewpoint as to whether or not Rich should be earning money from this site by charging for things and, also ignorant of the fact that I repeatedly give donations to fund this site. No I do not think it should be a free ride at all. I do however think that one part of it should remain completely free to avoid ethical problems. You really should read all of my posts on the issue of whether or not people should pay for the use of certain areas of this site. This site has potential to make as much money for Rich as kingsnake.com does for its owner. Funny how kingsnake.com and every other herp related web site to which I have ever subscribed does not charge a fee for its forums! But then that is getting side tracked.

You make it sound like all of us who have paid memberships are going to run around and lie for each other. I think that is just plain wrong to even insinuate Glenn. I think you have been here a long time and damn well know that a lot of the people here would not even begin to act in that way.
Actually I am asking a question, hypothesizing really, something about what many people are probably asking themselves right now about this site but are too intimidated to ask. You can bet your bottom dollar that many at other sites will now point to this site and say exactly what I asked but, they will be accusatory. The hint of something improper is there, and the enemies of this site, yes it has enemies or I should say Rich does in the herp business, will try to capitalize on it. If you know I have been around a long time, then you too have probably been here long enough to realize that this likely will be true as it has repeatedly happened in the past. Such seemingly keeps away some of the big time advertisers. You should also realize that the BOI has been full of stuff going on like this, as has the Rep Points system, or at least claims of unethical behavior in those areas have been reported. THE BOI INDEED HAS HAD SEVERAL LIARS CAUGHT THEREIN SPREADING FALSE GOOD AND BAD REPORTS ABOUT PEOPLE WHO USE THIS SITE. Are you all of a sudden going to tell me those people, the liars in general, will be disappearing because of this new system? (Wes {capital W} you seem to be taking this personally as if I attacked you. I asked a question. You should pay attention to what I just wrote it addresses your point too.) To imagine that some will not try to take unfair advantage of this system of good guy certification is like living in a Utopian fantasy.

Rich,

As far as my working in law enforcement goes, their is little to no comparison between what you are doing here reference the good guy certification and earning money with a job. The real comparison there would be if I were to take money from an individual to say that person was legit even if he or she was the best person in the world. I do not, have not, will not ever do that.

This was not started as your employment or as a job. If you choose to change it to such then fine, earn a living from it. I agree that you should make money from this site, I simply do not agree with how you think you should make money from it. Advertisers pay for every other herp related site I have ever registered for, why not this one too? My guess is that you cannot attract enough of the advertisers for some reason. So now what do you do, if someone pays more to join up you allow them to be accepted as Certified good Guys if they can get that rating. If kingsnake.com had done that years ago, you would have been amoing the first to smash them for it and if you really take a calm moment to think about that you woill see the truth in those words.

I was not accusing anyone of any thing, not even by insinuation. I was hypothesizing that this type of set up for certification of good guys may lead many to think there is an ethical problem here. I can see a possible problem , maybe because I am subject to pretty tough ethical standards. If you don’t see the potential for a problem fine.

Someone did make a good point about this system being like a Chamber of Commerce or Good Housekeeping or something like that. I can understand that yes you do have to be a member to get this type of rating, that is all well and good and, I guess it does not raise the issue of ethics or even raise a question of it. The thing raising the question about the issue of ethics is that only members who pay more can get it. Maybe there is no problem, but I was curious to see how others would see it so I asked a tough question.

As for leaving this site, if you are suggesting that I do so, then I will. This site is open for discussion of just about everything under the sun except when it comes to tough questions about this site and its owner. To bad, I think, that you cannot see merit in merely discussing the topic at hand without trying to make it appear as if I am mudslinging or on some sort of a vendetta against you or this site. Then again, I am beginning to wonder: if others do not go your way and instead give you some serious discussion, it appears as if you think it should be the highway for them. I ask tough questions about this site because of the intellectual freedom you have allowed here, because I like this site, and because I liked you. I figured that tough questions examined and answered now, here on this site and; solutions found to possible problems maybe would help prevent bad results for this site later on. However, if my laving is what you want - fine. Any time you want to remove me from your site, please feel free to do so, that is your prerogative but, definitely not my choice. If you choose to allow me to remain here, I will post questions or topics as I see fit within the framework of the rules of this site whether or not they are easy or tough and whether or not they are about you and this site. I know kingnskae.com cannot live with that type of post; are you telling us all that this is where you have finally arrived? I hope not.

Sincerely,
Glenn B
 
I feel stupid now!

I paid the 25 dollars so I could let people know who I liked buying from and if the seller was a jerk so I could post that as well. I did not know I was buying into the good old boys club. I thought I was paying someone to help me purchase reptiles from people who are honest, reputable and nice people. Because that is how I have been using the BOI. However, on the discussion forms I have been increasing my knowledge of the reptiles I keep including finding info for friends and family. So just my opinion, 25 bucks for the information I receive here is pretty cheep and next year I will pay the 10 dollars because I will have all the reptiles I am going to want. And just a side note Thanks Web Slave for having this form. Now I know who to buy from and who not to. You have saved me money.

Floyd the newbie
 
Glenn,

I am not ignorant of your view points. Maybe it is just me but many times your posts do not come across as trying to hypothesize. They sound down right accusatory. I apologize if I misunderstood your hypothesis for accusations.

With that being said, you say the hint of something improper is here. Well what is it that is improper? Is this more of your hypothesizing? That sounds very accusatory to me, not hypothesizing. If you are going to suggest something is improper, should you not identify exactly what that something is and present some facts to back up your claim?

Regardless of parts of this site being paid membership or free, there will always be people out there trying to get over on the system in place. In 10,000 years our society has not figured out a way to completely stop these types of people and it never will. No one here believes it will stop them completely, we are just hoping that it will make it a little harder on them.

And as far as you statement about others thinking there may be some kind of ethical problem at this site, well some people may think I like to stick bananas up my nose before I eat them. We can't control what other people want to think. All any of us can do is live our lives as honestly and fairly as possible and let the chips fall where they may. I don't have the time or the inclination to spend my life worrying about what other people think of me. If you live your life right, those types of things will take care of themselves.

In the words of Mr. John Cougar Mellencamp: "An honest mans pillow is his peace of mind".
 
Glenn,

I really don't know what your problem is, but it appears to have stemmed from a little while back when I mistakenly gave you one of those "dirty" contributor icons for a donation you make. Back then, what I was doing was automatically giving them to people who contributed $25 or more. You know why? Because now I am getting people asking me if that $10 they donated a few months ago can be used retroactively for their Participant membership now. I knew this was going to be coming, so I tried to head off some of the headaches, at least at that $25 level. So here I have people asking me for this (which I DO grant them if they tell me the date of that transaction) but YOU took up issue over it and acted like I was doing something unethical then. So I did what you apparenlyt wanted and removed that "dirty" unethically given icon from your membership record.

Then again, when the discussion came up about charging for access to post on the BOI, you again claimed (whether it was outright or implied is immaterial) that I was again unethical in breaking some sort of implied promise that you said I made to keep the BOI free for all eternity. And here you are NOW in this thread again claiming that I am doing something unethical by requiring a fee for members to take part in this Certification program. It certainly doesn't seem to me to matter much to you whatever my reasons are. You have it set in your head that your point of view is the RIGHT point of view and nothing can sway you from that.

Heck you have even attacked me over on my ArmsLocker forum claiming I am being negligent of some sort of duty I should have to moderate that forum and clean it up. But when I offered YOU the job, oh no, you certainly didn't want it! Saying it was too much work for you to do alone. Sheesh! That site at that time only have about 30 active members visiting it per day, and THAT was too much for you? Well, my friend, I was doing that site PLUS this site PLUS my CornSnakes.com site! Plus all of the rest of them AND my regular SerpenCo business. But when I put YOUR feet to the fire to take that job over, it's far too much for YOU to do. Even when I did put in another person plus yourself, I found that I still had to go in and catch stuff that apparently passed by you somehow. So after a period if that, I just threw in the towel and said to heck with moderating at all on that site.

So as far as I am concerned, I gave you your chance to prove yourself with your "help", and I found it lacking.

So now we are back to THIS site where it appears that everything I do, in your eyes, is unethical unless I do it for free. Sorry you have such a low opinion of my self worth. But personally I am getting tired of you martyring yourself over the fact that you have donated to this site. The last time you did I asked you if you wanted that Contributor graphic and you told me it does not matter one way or the other. I figured you wanted it to be kept anonymous, but you have brought it up in a couple of threads now, so apparently you don't. Why are you sending money to someone who you feel is as unethical as I am, then? If it is to try to make me feel bad, well you have succeeded. I feel bad taking money from you. Bad enough that I just and refunded your last donation. Bad enough to tell you to NOT send me money any longer, because I don't believe you are doing it to support this site or me at all. Whatever you motive is, I really don't care to know.

But if you have such obvious issues with this site, then just move along. I am not going to throw you out, but I am not going to be concerned if you leave or stay. I just don't think the same way you do about things Glenn so I guess you are just going to have to live with that. I try to do what I think is right and do it the best way I can. You, however, are trying to find a boogieman under every bed and even when there is not one there to be found, then you ask why the place was made for a boogieman to be hidden at.

You are NOT asking the tough questions being the knight in shining armor here Glenn. You are being the worst kind of troll. One who doesn't even know that he is one. Probably not intentionally, but one nonetheless, and no one can convince you otherwise. You just think you are RIGHT and the people who disagree just don't really understand you.

If you want to help out with what I am trying to do here, then please do. But engaging me in these flights of fancy of yours trying to flush out boogiemen from under bed is definitely not helping anyone here. You are simply wasting my time.
 
Rich,

I find it hard to believe ou said the following:

Heck you have even attacked me over on my ArmsLocker forum claiming I am being negligent of some sort of duty I should have to moderate that forum and clean it up. But when I offered YOU the job, oh no, you certainly didn't want it! Saying it was too much work for you to do alone. Sheesh! That site at that time only have about 30 active members visiting it per day, and THAT was too much for you? Well, my friend, I was doing that site PLUS this site PLUS my CornSnakes.com site! Plus all of the rest of them AND my regular SerpenCo business. But when I put YOUR feet to the fire to take that job over, it's far too much for YOU to do. Even when I did put in another person plus yourself, I found that I still had to go in and catch stuff that apparently passed by you somehow. So after a period if that, I just threw in the towel and said to heck with moderating at all on that site.
Rich whom are you trying to kid. I volunteered to be a moderator before you even brought it up at armslocker, albeit with the caveat that someone else would also moderate. You said you did not think I should be one, remember that. Then suddenly after no one else would go for it you selected me and one other person. You say you had only 20 people there at that time, then why did you need mods? It was because, in my opinion (and yours to be sure), one poster was posting an extreme amount of trash posts containing vulgarity, smut, fighting words and boasting of his illegal activity while encouraging others to do illegal things. You know that to be true, would you like to call me an outright liar on this because there is a lot of proof that will not support what you have just implied.

One guy has over 4,000 posts at that site, and that is under just one of the screen names that he is believed to use (there are at least 2 or 3 others screen names for the same guy aren’t there). Get that over 15 posts per day from the same guy, and probably the majority of them contain such things as very nasty name calling, gender slurs, bragging about illegal activity, trying to incite illegal activity, more nasty name calling, and rehashed old posts over and over and over and over again and other bad stuff, as I saw it, and as you saw it. In addition to his posts, there are replies to them from the other members who often got as bad or worse than him. He lit the fuse and the whole place would blow up. Please do not make it sound as if was a tame place. Also bear in mind I was helping out, and for free. I was not the one who wanted to run a forum type web site, I just came along for the ride and offered help when you needed it. You have some nerve to say that my help was lacking when all you could do back then was rag on the other users and let the one trash pen keep writing whatever he wanted to write, but that was your choice and was ok by me because it was your site. I still offered help, and you cannot with a clear conscience deny that now, nor should you fault me for not having the time to help you more than I did. You knew of my caveat from the beginning, that I would moderate only if there was another mod. You accepted that then but, now have the nerve to fault me for it? Who is changing things around here, not me. By the way, you have no idea what else I had on my plate back then besides helping moderate your site. I even moderated while I was away on travel status for my job, from a pc in a hotel business center because I thought I should try to do it as much as possible. While you did know I may have had to travel a lot, you did not know what other things I had to keep my busy. In the heat of battle so to speak at armslocker, I was often working 12 hour days not including my three hours of commute time daily. Then I also had a home, a family, other interests, and other ventures to attend to. You were and are not the only one who has other pressing matters which to attend. I coach PAL, I edit my local herp society’s journal, I take care of my own animals (I even try to sell some of them) – I too in other words had a life beyond armslocker. I helped you plain and simple because I chose to do so, because I saw potential for that site as a good one and; I chose to help you in addition to what was already going on in my life. Reading all of the posts (yes I tried to read every post every time I moderated and I tried to moderate daily even if at 2 AM) on that site was no easy task when that one guy was posting on average 15 per day, with many replies from others and yet more stuff to read that were in threads not including the troublemaker. Funny how you fault me just now!

As for saying you had to clean up what I missed who is kidding whom. Armslocker is one of the trashiest GUN oriented sites I have ever visited. You often admitted, in essence, just that. You never once faulted me, that I can recall (at least not to me) or my moderation style and only thanked me again and again for helping. Has that all suddenly changed because you are mad at me now?

Here are some excerpts of things you wrote in the moderators forum at armslocker.com:

This one is at http://www.armslocker.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29393

Actually if the gunkid goon squad had been on the up and up, I probably would have banned John Davis. But as it became more evident what was going on, I was not, and AM not going to let someone railroad me into doing what THEY want me to do. John Davis was actually getting better in his posting, and that just drove the wolf pack to distraction. So as it became evident that conflict is what they all want, and I (and any moderators) would be forever editing and deleting their crap, I just game them exactly what they apparently wanted, and definitely deserve.

It's just not worth putting the effort into for those clowns. I'm not about to shut down the site. I am having a great time watching those guys go through all kinds of contortions to try to intimidate me. Hell, I've been eating that kind of crap from the BOI for years now, so it doesn't even faze me.

Just laugh at them along with me, Glenn. That's exactly what they deserve, and is the best defense against trolls.

Thanks.

And this one at: http://www.armslocker.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29275

Not shutting it down, but just abandoning any effort to moderate and make these people act like fully mature adults. SatCong got his panties in a wad because I called him down on being just as much a problem as Gunkid is on this site, so I guess these people believe that I should just be anti-Gunkid just like they are and ONLY moderate his posts.

Well, it don't work that way. If moderation is going to take place at all, it is going to be evenly dispensed and as fair as I can possibly make it. Otherwise there will be NO moderation at all. And I will also remove the profanity blocks as well and let them have what they want.

At this point, I just don't see the point in making any effort and wasting my time on these people. I am willing to listen to you guys give me guidance, but I am STRONGLY leaning in that direction right now.

Aslan - did you give up moderation? I had to moderate posts that you had obviously seen. Did you quit on me? Can't say I would blame you. Not an easy job, now is it?

I still don't see you criticizing my moderation style, or saying that it was lacking. Do you?

And this one, also at: ://www.armslocker.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29275

I
have decided to abandon all moderation on this site. It just is not worth the time and effort. I have sites with a LOT more members then this one and don't have 1/100th of the headaches this one gives me. I, and certainly you and Glenn, have better things to do with our time then playing pattycake with these people on here.

So I am going to just go ahead and let them make fools of themselves.

I will read and respond to messages of my own personal interest, and to hell with the rest of it.

Thanks.

I still don't see it! Show me anything from the special Moderators Forum that indicates that I was not doing a decent job of trying to hold back the tidal wave of bad posts at that site. Go ahead, show us all PLEASE Rich show us. Yet, now you have the nerve to write this:

So as far as I am concerned, I gave you your chance to prove yourself with your "help", and I found it lacking.

You Rich are the one who gave up, not me. You are the one who let them do the what you say in the following:

Yeah. I'm hoping that if they have to wallow around in their own crap for a while, maybe they will get tired of the smell and be more receptive to paying more attention to the quality of their own posts instead of blaming it all on someone else.

Thanks

You surely tout yourself as someone other than a guy who would twist things around as I see you just did to make me look like a bad guy both at this and yet the armslocker site! In fact you think quite highly of yourself (seehttp://www.armslocker.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29185) :

I try to be fair, open minded, and give everyone the benefit of the doubt. And most of all, just because I run a message board doesn't mean I know anything more then anyone else who visits it. I've seen far too many site admins get smitten with the God syndrome.......

No Rich, I am not a knight in shining armor, nor am I looking for the Boogey Man. I was raising an issue, albeit one that you did not like, that I thought was quite pertinent to the way this site is now being run. I have not changed, over all the years I have used this site, in the way I post things that other may not like. That is not being a troll, that is airing things out that I believe are important. I did not set any bait or lure as someone would in trolling - you changed the way things are run, you brought up the fee for acceptance of good guy certification, and I brought up something with it that could potentially be a problem. Yes it was a tough question, and how do you respond: Again you, in my opinion, respond by calling me names, by twisting the truth (about armslocker), by getting pissed off and not thinking things out, and saying I think I am right and others just do not understand me. No that is not it at all. I know others can and do understand me, I give them credit for their ability to understand. I also understand that other and myself often disagree. So what, is that wrong, must we all see it your way now? I also post respectfully in the great majority of instances (my brief stint of bad posts at armslocker notwithstanding, as I was trying to fight fire with fire for a short time until I saw it did not work). I also happen to know that most others will not raise such issues because they are afraid of getting you pissed off, or because they do not want to bother, or because they don't see it my way at all. I did see what I saw and I raised the issue for open discussion, that is all I did. I am not saying I am right, I am discussing an issue, and mostly asking if others see it that way. I wanted some other opinions before I made up my mind on the issue. Funny though how I asked a question on one thing, and something totally ff topic is what probably will make up my mind for me. Of course I am referring to the statements you made about me and my moderation at armslocker. I think the armslocker thing has just about made up my mind.


As for you refunding my donation. whom are you again trying to kid. Does that make you feel as if you have done your penance? Is that blood money so to speak. Or isn’t that just like the kid saying I am taking my ball and leaving cause I don’t like you. Yeah it is the same kind of mentality – here I don’t want it because the grapes are just sour anyhow. Funny though, you have always taken my money quite readily, even this last $25 that is until I raise an issue that you really do not like. It was your money to do with as you pleased, once you received it from me, now you have returned it - but do not say it was not meant as a donation - all my money to you was always meant to support you and your site as have been meant these posts that pee you off so badly. I was not throwing it in your face, I brought it up because of how many times people have, in essence, asked me if I wanted a free ride on your site or implied that I want to be a free loader.

As I said, it was your money and, you gave it back to me. That is fine. As I said many times, this is your site to do with as you please even if I think it a mistake. The thing is though you have usually allowed people to point out when they think you are making a mistake, or when they think there could be a potential problem for you to nip in the bud. As you invited, I gave my thoughts in things on these forums. You never said anything about you having to like them or about them having to be easy butt kissing nicities for you to love. Your reaction really surprises me after all I have read that you have written about others, what I have read that you wrote about this site, and after what I read what you have written about other herp sites and their practices. I never say myself as the white knight Rich, you got that wrong in the extreme. I was one of many of the knights servants. You were always the white knight Rich, at least that is how your many of your membership perceived you, don’t you get it. You were the guy saving us from the crappy herp sites and the unscrupulous herp dealers. You were the one pushing ethics to the max for the herp industry and for herp related web sites. We all just followed along. I am sorry but, now I see some tarnish in that armor after receiving my biggest surprise. I guess the thing I find most surprising and hardest to believe about you is that you would so blatantly twist out of shape the whole thing at armslocker, because twisted out of shape is certainly what it appears to me that you have done just to make me look like a bad guy here. Absolutely unbelievable….

Sincerely,
Glenn B
 
Good Lord...

I realize you two have a past history and I'm "new" to this site and have NO idea what you two are referring to regarding Armslocker ( nor do I wish to) but it appears to me that some people just have too much time on their hands.
 
Glenn, I have explained what was going on every step of the way here. I have also replied to the torrent of posts you have made with explanations. None of them apparently satisfied you or you just choose not to believe them

Whatever.

You feel the need to keep repeating yourself. I don't feel the need to keep repeating myself in reply. You don't have to agree with my decisions. But if you want to stay here, you have to live with them to use those functions that have now changed.

In my opinion, you are trying hard to make the downfall of this site your very own self-fullfilling prophesy, by your constant implications of nefarious motives for everything I do here.

Tell you what, Glenn, stop trying to TELL me how I should be doing this site. Go out and make up your own and SHOW me how it should be done. You obviously think you know all of the right things to do, so show me. Stop being a backseat driver and get into the driver's seat. Just do it and prove to me that you know what is best for me and this site.

Good luck!
 
Glenn Bartley said:
Rich,
I never say myself as the white knight Rich, you got that wrong in the extreme. I was one of many of the knights servants. You were always the white knight Rich, at least that is how your many of your membership perceived you, don’t you get it. You were the guy saving us from the crappy herp sites and the unscrupulous herp dealers. You were the one pushing ethics to the max for the herp industry and for herp related web sites. We all just followed along. I am sorry but, now I see some tarnish in that armor after receiving my biggest surprise. I guess the thing I find most surprising and hardest to believe about you is that you would so blatantly twist out of shape the whole thing at armslocker, because twisted out of shape is certainly what it appears to me that you have done just to make me look like a bad guy here. Absolutely unbelievable….

Sincerely,
Glenn B

Glenn, note capitol G, I for one NEVER saw Rich as a White knight at all.

I saw him as the guy who gave us a place to clean up after ourselves. He was, titularly, the leader ONLY in that his example as a business man was good and as a person was upstanding. And, it's HIS site.

I'm no knight but I do believe I am a good guy. You and I disagree but that in and of itself does not make you NOT a good guy. BUT, you seem to think that there was some Great Leader thing happening, and if it was I totally missed it, that seems to have been the cause of your continually repeating yourself. If you're one of the Knights, then take your orders, which were to give your input and then live with the consequences, NOT to continually question them.

If you're on Rich's team, and Rich is the leader, and you're a follwer, THEN FOLLOW.

If you're NOT on Rich's team, and you're NOT going to captain one of your own, just what the heck do you think you're accomplishing?

If you respond to this please exercise brevity as I have taken to only reading the last few hundred words in your posts, not the hundreds of thousands that you've been writing.

I'm not using my "charm" here, I really don't get what you're trying to accomplish or, more to the gist of the matter, WHY you're trying to accomplish whatever your goal is. Do you even have goal or are you just trying to see what will happen?
 
I agree with Webbie on this one.

Glenn should do the right thing. He should emulate the proverbial tragic hero of the old classic western. Truss your wound, saddle up and ride slowly off into that cold dark night. Your only comfort being the knowledge that you made a stand against the greedy cattle barron(played by Webbie) as you hear that little blonde haired kid(played by the last few posters) yell SHANE!............SHAAAAAANEEEEEE!......COME BACK SHANE!...........(yea...I know its gregg...that was just for effect) and leave the audience wondering "Who was that masked man?"......wait, thats another movie, right?
 
Back
Top