enharmonic
New member
Just received another email from Doug. He has informed me that James did call.
He said, paraphrased, that it has been cleared up, and that James will not be misrepresenting the animal anymore. He made no comment on whether the misrepresentation was accidental or intended, made no comment on whether the animal is truly in James' possession, and, lastly, suggested that an eye be keep out for any other "accidental" misrepresentations. I will post a copy of the email shortly, for the sake of a good record.
He said, paraphrased, that it has been cleared up, and that James will not be misrepresenting the animal anymore. He made no comment on whether the misrepresentation was accidental or intended, made no comment on whether the animal is truly in James' possession, and, lastly, suggested that an eye be keep out for any other "accidental" misrepresentations. I will post a copy of the email shortly, for the sake of a good record.