cinderbird
Dances with geckos
I will refer him to here and he can clear this up. That there is something there. Weather it's nothing or not theres a defect in the tail. Vet said its not genetic but something that happen in birth. Still is a defect for a perfect snake.
For the 30th time, you were offered a refund for the animal if you returned it.
The seller already acknoweledged that there may have been something wrong with the animal and offered to correct it.
The issue has already been addressed.
You keep going on about how you were "misled" and "lied" to. People make mistakes, and in this case Josh went out of his way to fix that and you just don't want to be satisfied it seems.
In any other transaction, what would happen? Lets say you purchase a computer from (x) company, you get it and find the CD drive doesn't work (something small, but important and easially overlooked). You call the company and ask if you can return it for a new one. If the company has good practices and standards they have you box it up, send it back and either repair it or send you a new one. Why is this transaction so different?
The good guys and bad guys are seperated by WHAT they do WHEN there is a problem. As its not a matter of "if" there is a problem. Good breeders and suppliers go out of their way to correct mistakes. Bad guys keep your money and leave you high and dry. Based on this thread what do you think everyone who has taken the time to read it has labeled Outback as?
Hopefully your buddy can shed some light on this.