• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Justin Bailey - Fat Frogs - using others pics on his website

Exactly! I asked Joe Compel if I could use the photograph of the female Super Pastel I purchased from him in some advertising, even so far as to possibly wrap my van using the photo as my logo. All he asked of me was to talk to my printer to see exactly what size photo they needed, in pixels, and he would take care of it. Not only did he say yes, he offered to mail them to me on disk. I am still waiting for the disk but, it hasnt been long.

You'll have to post some pics up after if you wrap your van with that photo, sounds cool.
 
Well, my attempt to get the hosting site to act on the copyright infringements went nowhere. Got this email from them explaining why.

Dear Webs User,

Thank you for contacting Webs Corporation ("Webs "). Webs respects the intellectual property rights of others and we would be pleased to take action pursuant to the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and/or Webs established polices and procedures to assist you in the protection of the intellectual property rights held by you or your client.

However, your recent correspondence was insufficient to constitute an effective Notification of Infringement ("NOI") within the meaning of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and/or as required by Webs policy. The elements required for an effective NOI, and the contact information for submitting a NOI to Webs , are set forth below.

Please be aware that you may submit a NOI in response to this e-mail. To be effective within the meaning of the DMCA, a NOI must contain substantially the following:

1. A description of the copyrighted work or other intellectual property
that you claim has been infringed;

2. A description of the location where the material that you claim is infringing is located;

3. A statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the reported use is not authorized by the copyright or intellectual property owner, its agent, or the law;

4. Your address, telephone number, and, if available, e-mail address;

5. A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information is accurate and that you are the copyright or intellectual property owner or authorized to act on the copyright or intellectual property owner's behalf; and

6. An electronic or physical signature by the person making the submission (i.e., you or such other person authorized to act on behalf of the copyright holder). If the submission is made electronically, to satisfy the signature requirement please designate the electronic signature by typing a forward slash before and after the name of the authorized person making the submission (e.g., /Jane Doe/) and follow this electronic signature with the typed name of the person. For example:

/Jane Doe/
Jane Doe

This format is intended to represent a signature and typed name as is customarily found within the signature block of business correspondence transmitted in hard copy.

Once Webs has received a NOI containing each of the required elements detailed above, Webs will expeditiously proceed to process your request.

We wish to thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or we can further assist you in this matter.

Best Regards,
Webs

Apparently I have to be the injured party (or a representative of said injured party) in order to make a claim, even though I provided clear links and screenshots of the copyrighted material. Oh well, hopefully those who's work was stolen will be able to do something about it.
 
you can take pictures off othe peoples site if they dont have the circle with the R in the middle. theres nothing in the laws saying you cant take it inless they say it or have the R with the circle around it.
 
you can take pictures off othe peoples site if they dont have the circle with the R in the middle. theres nothing in the laws saying you cant take it inless they say it or have the R with the circle around it.

Actually, there is. All photographs are copyright the original photographer. Taking them and redistributing them without permission is copyright infringement.

As a photographer this is something that really NEEDS to be stopped. Want to use someone elses pics? Ask permission. If they say yes, follow their requirements. If they say no? accept it and move on.

Someone elses hard work is not there for anyone to profit from without permission.
 
for some reason I can't edit my post.. the (r) is a trademark I'm pretty sure, that is something ENTIRELY different than (c) which is copyright. They apply to two completely different things.
 
you can take pictures off othe peoples site if they dont have the circle with the R in the middle. theres nothing in the laws saying you cant take it inless they say it or have the R with the circle around it.

im taking a web class right now. you dont have to ask the person who had the picture if you can use it. there no way in hell thats agast the law.

None of that is true...

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showpost.php?p=935895&postcount=1
 
im taking a web class right now. you dont have to ask the person who had the picture if you can use it. there no way in hell thats agast the law.

Polasian is right!
Did you even bother to read anything that has been posted? It is not so simple as having a little "circle with the R in the middle" which is akin to a trademark so the registered mark wouldn't apply in this situation anyways. Copyrights are for pictures, those laws would apply. Either your prof. is mistaken or you're not paying attention. Making these false claims publicly could get someone in trouble, check your facts before you attempt to post again.
 
im taking a web class right now. you dont have to ask the person who had the picture if you can use it. there no way in hell thats agast the law.

Your professor should be fired. It's been against the law to use ANY WORK produced by ANYONE since 1976, regardless of copyright notifications. Copyright is an inherent attribute of all digital photos, it exists whether you acknowledge it or not. And funny enough, exists whether the person that owns it puts "Copyright" on it.

What community college was this again?
 
Back
Top