• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Karen A Toms Misrepresented Animals?

And yet, without a name in the original inquiry, it couldn't have been put in the BOI at all. I don't think it would have recieved the amount of attention it did if it had been posted in the General Business forum. This is exactly where it belongs. If someone had posted the same about me and I then had several people come to my defense I would have had no problem with the POSITIVE advertising that had resulted. Conversly, had I been proven to be using two different pictures of what was supposed to be the same lizard, then I would not have been pleased, having been proven publicly to be a liar, but Christa would have been,(pleased that is). That is what this board is supposed to do, ferret out the honest from those who are not. When I think back to this I will remember that the overwhelming response was that both pictures were, indeed , of the same gecko. No harm, no foul.

Wes Pollock
 
I won't comment on the other points of discussion in this particular thread but I do want to say that in my opinion, 24 hours is not necessarily enough time for someone to reply to an email.

I personally try my best to reply to emails in a timely manner and sometimes I can do it a minute after I receive an email but other times I can't get to it until the next day or a day later, etc. I would hope that people can understand that not everyone has the time to check and reply to emails on a continuous, constant basis and actually give others a reasonable amount of time to reply to an email. I would think two to three days would be more reasonable then 24 hours. I don't know how many people guarantee that they will respond to email inquiries within 24 hours but I don't think very many do.

If an issue/question/inquiry/etc. is that urgent or pressing, then don't email...but call (although I see in this particular instance, no phone number was provided in the ad).

Anyways, I just wanted to menton that because I know how it can be with emails and email inquiries.

Thanks,

Celia Chien
 
JUST MY OPINION...

I completely agree with Christa. The photos of the two Leopard Geckos in the original post ARE NOT the same gecko.

While it is true that Leos will develop their color and lose black spotting on their bodies as they grow from hatchlings, the head and tail markings remain fairly consistent from about 4-6 months old all the way to adulthood. The markings on the heads and tails of those tow geckos are similar, but definately NOT the same.
 
I am the seller in question here. Please allow me to respond to some of the discussion going on here.

On the morning of April 6, I posted 3 advertisements for geckos in the Kingsnake Leopard Geckos classifieds. The time from Kingsnake for the ad in question is 09:03:10.

My first contact with Ms. Rucker was in the following e-mail, sent through Kingsnake (only e-mail addresses and the IP log are changed):

To: (Karen A Toms)
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: Message about: Albeys Hypo Carrot Tail

That's not the same animal unless for some reason she got MORE head spotting as she got older.

----------------------------------------------
This message was sent by an unregistered or non logged in user.

Sent 09:29 AM, Apr 06th, 2003 from I.P. Address **.***.***.**


This is the entire message – no inquiry posed about the animal, no interest in the animal advertised. It’s not even signed. Quite simply, the first contact I have ever had with this person was an anonymous accusation. While some people may have simply deleted this e-mail and given it no further thought, I replied to it with the following e-mail (again, only e-mail addresses changed):

To: (Christa Rucker)
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: Message about: Albeys Hypo Carrot Tail

She is the same animal - a year and a half older and picture
taken with a different camera and lighting. If you have doubts, and
an actual interest in the animal, contact Albey.


To which I received the following response:

To: "Karen A Toms"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Message about: Albeys Hypo Carrot Tail

I will eat my shoe, I have asked many people if infact that could get more
head spotting and darker over all.

Thank you for your response and sorry for my rudeness. I won't be so quick
to jump the gun again. You have some beautiful animals. Again I'm sorry for
jumping the gun and not checking before doing so.

Christa Rucker


After this, I believed any kind of altercation to be over. Information received, apparently. Then, as I go through the discussion here, I find that may not quite be the case just yet.

Let me first state categorically and unequivocally that the gecko in my picture is the one in Albey’s picture. They are the same animal. Different lighting, different background, different camera, over a year and a half time between the two pictures – all these can contribute to a potential misunderstanding. In fact, the only reason I included Albey’s picture in the first place was to demonstrate that it was indeed the same animal. While I believed that the information I included in the ad would clear any confusion (“Her Original picture from Albey’s Too Cool Reptiles and the male she has been paired with pictured above.”), apparently it unintentionally added to it. I have made this experience a learning opportunity in that I will probably not add the pictures from Albey or any other original breeder pictures again, dealing with potential questions personally or referring them to the original breeder.

However, there are some points I wish to make concerning the conversation here. Ms. Rucker’s first post was the essentially the same accusation that she e-mailed me personally. It was not until ms_terese posted that an actual question was posed. Ms. Rucker even goes so far as to accuse me in the subject line of the thread itself, an act that not only is violating the rules for posting here but also can do a lot of intentional damage to me. Think as a potential buyer – if you did a search on someone’s name and saw this subject heading, would YOU pay attention to the question mark at the end? I say “intentional” because it is only with the post concerning me that she goes outside Posting Guidelines concerning an inquiry, and while she seems to apologize about her wording “striking a nerve,” that helps me very little in regard to those who may check this board in the future and see a disproved accusation impersonating an inquiry in the subject line.

In regard to Ms. Rucker’s complaint about my response time, the original e-mails tell the story. The first e-mail I received was sent at 10:29 (thanks to Kingsnake’s feedback software), and my response was sent at 11:06, exactly 37 minutes later. 37 minutes does not equal 24 hours, no matter which side of the date line you’re on. And while I am doing Internet sales, unfortunately I cannot maintain constant contact with the computer. As stated by Celia Chen, I also attempt to answer every e-mail I receive in a timely manner.

Make no mistake, I’m not questioning the purpose of this board. I’m all for an inquiry into business practices and experiences (good and bad) with businesses. But when the title of a thread reads “Karen A Toms Misrepresented Animals?”, I personally find it completely libelous as well as a misuse of the board as to its original purpose. This is a place to gather knowledge and information about breeders and sellers, not to post groundless accusations. It is kind of an irony that an act of courtesy (in my opinion, her original e-mail did not dignify a response at all) has started a fairly damaging series of events.

Many thanks to those who posted positively to the question posed by ms_terese, and I appreciate all those who helped in settling the matter as quickly as possible.

Thanks!
Karen A Toms
 
First off I did e mail the owner of that gecko and I did ask her. And for a FULL day I didn't receive a reply.

If the e-mails Karen posted are accurate then the above quote is a blatant lie to try to justify this thread. Karen, I understand why you're upset but I think anyone that inquires about you here will read the entire thread and come to the conclusion that you didn't do anything wrong. I don't think it'll hurt you at all.
 
To: (Karen A Toms)
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: Message about: Albeys Hypo Carrot Tail

That's not the same animal unless for some reason she got MORE head spotting as she got older.

----------------------------------------------
This message was sent by an unregistered or non logged in user.

Sent 09:29 AM, Apr 06th, 2003 from I.P. Address **.***.***.**

2 timestamps on one post...
 
RESPECTFULLY...

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
She is the same animal - a year and a half older and picture taken with a different camera and lighting. If you have doubts, and an actual interest in the animal, contact Albey
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I do have some doubts, and I did have an actual interest in the animal when I saw the ad on KS Classifieds until I studied the pictures carefully and came to a similar conclusion as the person who started this thread.

Karen, if I'm wrong I will most certainly post a public apology to you and this Forum, but I still feel that the two photos are NOT of the same Leo. Although they are very similar, the differences in the head spotting between the two is certainly subtle, especially to the non-discerning eye, but I have never seen black spotting on the tail to be so markedly different in adult Leopard Geckos.

I have contacted Albey, and hopefully he will respond and shed some light on this confusing dilemma.
__________________
Marcia McGuiness
"The Lizard Lady"
http://www.thelizardlady.net


"In my opinion, opinions are beliefs that are stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge. This I know positively." - Marcia McGuiness '03
 
She didn't respond for over 24 hrs.

or

She responded 27 minutes later.


One thing is for absolute certain here: Someone is lying. The sad thing is we'll likely never for sure who it is . . .

:(
 
If I can shed some light on the two different times, I think this is why ther are two different times...

The first time stamp at the top of the message (10:29am) is when Karen Toms received the email in her time zone.

The second time stamp at the bottom of the message (9:29am) is the time the email was sent according to Kingsnake.com which is Central Time because they are located in Texas.

As you can see, the second time stamp is exactly one hour before the first one. My guess is that Karent Toms is located in Eastern Time where they are one hour ahead. I checked the emails I get and mine are always two hours before.

For example, I just sent a test email to myself:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 9:40 PM
Subject: Message about: Rio Fuerte Beaded Lizards - YEARLINGS now and doing GREAT! PICS!

Test

----------------------------------------------
This message was sent by an unregistered or non logged in user.

Sent 11:40 PM, Apr 07th, 2003 from I.P. Address 12.233.157.221

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As you can see, my time is exactly two hours before the time stamp on the bottom because I'm on Pacific time.

Celia Chien
 
RESPONSE FROM ALBEY

As I stated in a previous post, I contacted Albey regarding this, and this is his response:

Subj: RE: Can you solve this?
Date: 4/7/2003 10:28:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent from the Internet (Details)


Marcia,

I saw the same pictures last night on Kingsnake and I will tell you this. In all the years I have been keeping Leopard Geckos I have never had one change that drastically while it was in my possession. When I took that picture that Gecko was at least 40 – 45 grams. If anything, they usually get lighter in color or more washed out looking. That said, it sure looks like it could be the same gecko except for the head spot amount and color, and the tail spotting.

Your guess is as good as mine. LOL


Thanks,

Albey Scholl
Albey’s “Too Cool” Reptiles
http://www.albeysreptiles.com
E-mail: [email protected]
(404) 325-0292




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Can you solve this?


Hello Albey,

Apparently there is confusion regarding one of your Leos, and I was hoping you could shed some light on the debate. I have never seen a Leopard Gecko's tail change in the amount of black spotting as in this case, and although the two Leos look very similar, I believe they are not the same gecko. The difference in patterning on the heads is fairly subtle to the non-discerning eye, but the tails are way too different. I guess this comes from being able to tell each and every gecko I have apart from the others... including my patternless and blizzards. LOL!

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16333&perpage=20&pagenumber=1

Thanks,
Marcia McGuiness
"The Lizard Lady"
www.thelizardlady.net
 
WELL?

I think this rediculous post is the very reason some people may be saying this board is for "entertainment" value only. First, no I do not find the post entertaining, but what I am saying is this post does not belong here in my opinion, bad mouths or brings into question the credibility of a business/person trying to do business and devalues a legitimet post.
This is a place to gather knowledge and information about breeders and sellers, not to post groundless accusations.
Karen, I understand why you're upset but I think anyone that inquires about you here will read the entire thread and come to the conclusion that you didn't do anything wrong. I don't think it'll hurt you at all.
One thing is for absolute certain here: Someone is lying. The sad thing is we'll likely never for sure who it is . . .
I think I will now just go back to lurking.
I've been on a slow burn ever since I posted the reply from Albey, and I would like to know 2 things:

1.) Why didn't any of you "ferrets" think about contacting Albey to get his opinion before jumping to conclusions? I thought that what this forum is all about... getting to the bottom of things.

2.) What is the opinion/conclusion everybody came up with?

From what I can conclude, this forum/post/string has only accomplished the determination that there is more than one time zone that gets stamped on email, and driving one of it's members into hiding.
 
LOL...I've been checking back to see if there have been any replies to the posting of the email from Albey as well. I had no comment about the Gecko earlier because I just don't know enough about how Leopard Gecko patterning changes as they grow but I am interested in seeing how this thread turns out...seems like it's just kind of stopped...at least for now.

One other point though...it seems like nobody who spoke up for Karen Toms contacted Albey, but neither did Christa Rucker before she started this thread. I'm not on one side or the other here but I am interested in seeing how this all turns out and who is really telling the truth.

Celia Chien
 
Marcia,

To be fair, and since you quoted a snippet from my post, let me put it in context for those who might not understand what I was saying. It goes like this:

There are two stories concerning how quickly (or slowly) Karen responded to the intial inquiries:

"She did not respond in over 24 hours"

or

"She responded 27 minutes later"


One thing is for sure here, someone is lying! These two statements cannot both be true at the same time. Therefore, either Christa is lying when she says that Karen did not respond for more than 24 hours, or Karen is lying when she says she responded 27 minutes later. It is one or the other, but one of them is not telling the truth!

The sad thing is, we will likely never know which one is being honest here, because the evidence is lacking. I say "sad" not only because we cannot prove the guilty party's culpability, but also because an unneccessary pall has been cast upon the innocent party as well.

You may not appreciate the ineffectiveness of this thread, but not all of us have ever claimed to be "ferrets." I know I never have. I just see that when two people are telling two stories which are completely contradistinctive from one another, someone is lying . . . period.
 
FYI

Emails - Emails can be delayed for a number of reasons. So while Karen may have sent one out immediately it may not have been delivered immediately (or at all, remember the internet is really still in it's infancy and has glitches). I had a client test their email one time. From an AOL to an AOL account across the office (10') took 4 hours. Just a FYI.
 
Of course you are now comparing apples to... moldy apples? ;) AOL is hardly an appropriate model for how the internet as a whole is functioning. :eek:


As for who is the liar in regards to timestamps... does it matter?

Someone can jump the gun, there's no harm in that if the only damage they do is posting here. Here we can correct misgivings with little trouble.

Only bad guys have to worry about negative posts here. The good guys will always come out on top in the end.


So is this an inquiry about a good guy or a bad guy?

We now have Albey's input on the matter... end of story?
 
thread really did not prove one way or the other

What ferrets are you talking about?

Why should someone on here posting contact Albey, or whoever, the person who STARTED the thread may have thought about it.

From what Albey said, sounds like they are unsure, which does not prove anything one way or the other.

And to restate my problem with the thread, it was in the way it was worded, misrepresented, can be a harsh word without proof. And lets say for a second that some people do not live on this site, actually have lives outside of reptiles, and just were browsing the site and saw a name next to the word misrepresented, and did not open the thread, and assumes the worst...just does not seem fair.

Again, if it was a normal ball python, and someone is selling it as an albino, then yes, that might be a good thread to see, but these pic looked way to close to start all this hoopla about:)

Dave Reid
 
Unless Albey has kept track of this particular gecko ever since he sold it I don't know how contacting him can serve any purpose. I too am curious as to what "ferrets" you're referring to.
 
Subject: Re: Message about: Albeys Hypo Carrot Tail

She is the same animal - a year and a half older and picture
taken with a different camera and lighting. If you have doubts, and
an actual interest in the animal, contact Albey.


Subj: RE: Can you solve this?
Date: 4/7/2003 10:28:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent from the Internet (Details)


Marcia,

I saw the same pictures last night on Kingsnake and I will tell you this. In all the years I have been keeping Leopard Geckos I have never had one change that drastically while it was in my possession. When I took that picture that Gecko was at least 40 – 45 grams. If anything, they usually get lighter in color or more washed out looking. That said, it sure looks like it could be the same gecko except for the head spot amount and color, and the tail spotting.

Your guess is as good as mine. LOL


Thanks,

Albey Scholl


at least 40 - 45 grams.

That makes it an adult not a sub-adult.

If you have doubts, and
an actual interest in the animal, contact Albey.


Albey says he's not sure if it's the sameone.

I agree with Bobby not every breeder would know an animal a few years later.

But even Albey agrees with me that the tail and head spots normaly grow lighter, not darker with age.

:(
 
Back to square one

I'm back to my original thought on this: both pictures show good looking animals. If it were not the same animal, why would the seller have indicated it was?

Again, let me point out that my knowledge of these animals is limited, but it doesn't make sense to me.

Would the Albey line make it more valuable?

I guess what it comes down to is that I've seen no real reason to doubt what the seller has claimed, and no real evidence that she's misrepresented anything. Albey can't definitively ID that animal as the same one, but I don't see any denials that he sold that animal to Karen. There have been opinions on both sides of the argument that the coloration and spotting would change to the extent it has, but there will continue to be differing opinions on that. Unless someone had the forethought to tattoo that little guy right after he hatched....

I think it's time to let this rest. Christa has apologized for the wording and possibly jumping the gun on the post. Karen has responded and answered the questions that were posed to the best of her ability. By now, he's probably been sold and is on the way to his new home..... time to move on, I think.
 
Back
Top