• In the past two days I have gotten emails asking about being requested to provide credit card info in order to register and also to make a post in the classifieds forums. PLEASE NOTE: In no instance will this site ask you for this sort of information. The only time any request for payment is made is if you choose to opt-in for a higher membership level, and that is done SOLELY through PayPal. Anything else is coming from a source other than this site. My guess is that this is coming through Google Adsense, but when I can get someone to send me a screen shot of this sort of request, I will know more.
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Katie Richardson - ExtraordinaryReptile’s - Questionable???

Do you think it's possible that

Raymond Harrison is Ray Strickland - who I see is using another name on Reptibid? LOL, just having some fun -

Truely I think that Katie got ripped off, how she carries it from there is up to her. I guess as long as she states that they are from the Harrison Collection then we all know where we stand. At this point Katie I'd try to get Raymond to take them back or present evidence, because you are not going to be able to sell his snakes honestly. If he doesn't come forward, then he truely is scum, since he hasn't so far you can draw your own conclusions from his actions or lack there of. How does it feel to know hes now vacationing on your money and you won't be able to make it back?

Tosha McClintock
 
My experience with this...

Okay. I guess I feel the need to speak up...

First let me say this: "I am not 100% positive that Katie is the same woman who contacted me regarding the story to follow."

As many of you know, I had two female Het Pieds for sale recently. About a week or two ago, a woman (I think it was Katie or something close) called me to discuss the whole Heterozygous Piebald thing. She was clearly a newbie on all things genetic. She explained that she had been scammed out of $2900 for false Het Pieds. As she told it, she responded to an advertisement for three (0.3) Het Pieds for $2700. (Great deal, huh?) What she received was 1.2 obvious WILD CAUGHT animals. She contacted the seller and he mentioned that two orders had been mixed up. He promptly sent out three new animals...and she again paid shipping (another red flag)...but was able to keep the WC animals. (If my memory serves me correctly, she again recieved 1.2 animals.) The reason she contacted me was to get my opinion on the validity of these "Hets". It was obvious that she was a newbie, because her new concern was that these new hets looked nothing like the het male she recently purchased from Top Shelf Exotics. I explained to her that since this is a simple recessive trait, there is no way to discount the validity based on a comparison to another het. It took a while, but I think she finally grasped the concept of simple recessive and normal-looking hets. Regardless, this woman was very firm in her belief that she had been ripped off.

A few days later I saw a ReptiBid ad with a nearly identical story...an advertisement for 0.3 Heterozygous Piebalds with paperwork. This scared me a bit, so I immediately contacted Tosha and warned her. (Because we all know Tosha buys every animal in existence...especially Het Pieds.)

Anyway...as I said before: "I am not 100% positive that Katie is the same woman who contacted me regarding this story."

Chris
 
Also...

If this is the same person, it may be necessary to remember that it took a while to explain simple recessive genetics. She is definitely a newbie, so innocent mistakes could easily be made.

However...she was pretty certain that she had been ripped off.

Hmm...I'm conflicted now.

Chris
 
CJBianco said:
Okay. I guess I feel the need to speak up...

First let me say this: "I am not 100% positive that Katie is the same woman who contacted me regarding the story to follow."

As many of you know, I had two female Het Pieds for sale recently. About a week or two ago, a woman (I think it was Katie or something close) called me to discuss the whole Heterozygous Piebald thing. She was clearly a newbie on all things genetic. She explained that she had been scammed out of $2900 for false Het Pieds. As she told it, she responded to an advertisement for three (0.3) Het Pieds for $2700. (Great deal, huh?) What she received was 1.2 obvious WILD CAUGHT animals. She contacted the seller and he mentioned that two orders had been mixed up. He promptly sent out three new animals...and she again paid shipping (another red flag)...but was able to keep the WC animals. (If my memory serves me correctly, she again recieved 1.2 animals.) The reason she contacted me was to get my opinion on the validity of these "Hets". It was obvious that she was a newbie, because her new concern was that these new hets looked nothing like the het male she recently purchased from Top Shelf Exotics. I explained to her that since this is a simple recessive trait, there is no way to discount the validity based on a comparison to another het. It took a while, but I think she finally grasped the concept of simple recessive and normal-looking hets. Regardless, this woman was very firm in her belief that she had been ripped off.

A few days later I saw a ReptiBid ad with a nearly identical story...an advertisement for 0.3 Heterozygous Piebalds with paperwork. This scared me a bit, so I immediately contacted Tosha and warned her. (Because we all know Tosha buys every animal in existence...especially Het Pieds.)

Anyway...as I said before: "I am not 100% positive that Katie is the same woman who contacted me regarding this story."

Chris

Oops. Forgot to sign my FULL name.

Christopher J. Bianco
Spartanburg, SC
 
I just want to point out...

If it stinks like a tuna, swims like a tuna and looks like a tuna......it is, in all likelihood, a tuna. This story has so many holes in it, trying to defend it is ridiculous.

Katie, fess up and try to salvage something out of this mess. The indirect statements of Mr. Bianco pretty much seal the lid on this mess.

By the way Wes, stick to detective work. The poetry community just called and asked you to resign your membership. (Actually it was pretty funny)
 
CJBianco said:
Oops. Forgot to sign my FULL name.

Christopher J. Bianco
Spartanburg, SC

<-----------as long as your full name is over in the info panel to the left, you don't have to sign it at the end of the post.
 
CJBianco said:
First let me say this: "I am not 100% positive that Katie is the same woman who contacted me...."
Chris,

Was it a mobile phone that you got the call on? If so, your bill could show where the call came from.

Either way, Katie, did you call Chris? Was this you that made this call???

That would "seal the deal" on Katie, wouldn't it? :p

No matter how uninformed one is and how naive, to knowingly pass on misrepresented animals is as unethical as unethical can be.
 
No matter how uninformed one is and how naive, to knowingly pass on misrepresented animals is as unethical as unethical can be.

Bingo Jim! Two wrongs don't make a right. When you are wronged, it feels bad. Why do it to someone else?
 
Documentation Harrison

OK guys here it is. Finaly got my scanner to work: This is one of three documents I got from Katie
 
Orchid Gecko said:
OK guys here it is. Finaly got my scanner to work: This is one of three documents I got from Katie
Steve, try again. No document there.
 
OK let me try it aghttp://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=&stc=1
Harrison 3.jpgain.
 

Attachments

  • Harrison 3.jpg
    Harrison 3.jpg
    81.5 KB · Views: 167
That doesn't look right. The numbers on the botton appear to have been added, they seem to have a shadow.

This whole thing is STILL real fishy. The numbers on the pictures don't match the numbers on the leftside column don't match the snakes and the snakes, in their MINISCULE pictures do NOT appear to be hatchlings.

And, didn't katie say she had hets? Doesn't that invoice PLAINLY state NORMAL females?

Perhaps it's on the invoices yet to be posted.

I STILL say we're in downtown Tunaville.
 
The great conspiracy theorist is at it again :raspberry

Very mistrusting aren't we? Sure its possible that the document has been altered. Will we ever really know? I guess it'll have to be a judgment call for people on whether they want to deal with this person in the future.

Jamie
 
The way I'm reading the documentation is that the animals listed are the offspring of a trio consisting of a pied male to 2 normal females, which would make the offspring 100% hets.

I'm also confused as to why Mr. Harrison could not tell if the returned snakes were his hets or not, since he appears to have photographed all of his offspring. I don't own any BPs (yet) but I would think that having photos to compare to would make this pretty easy.
 
MLechner said:
The way I'm reading the documentation is that the animals listed are the offspring of a trio consisting of a pied male to 2 normal females, which would make the offspring 100% hets.

I'm also confused as to why Mr. Harrison could not tell if the returned snakes were his hets or not, since he appears to have photographed all of his offspring. I don't own any BPs (yet) but I would think that having photos to compare to would make this pretty easy.

That could well be so, the pied male to the normal females.

Still, with pics of the babies, which apparently are included with the invoice, identification should be a snap.

Unless of course there is some underhanded shinnanigans going on.

Next stop, Mackeral Lane, ladies hosery(as in katie got HOSED) and implementia for cleaning the scum off.
 
I'm sure it's just me

but that pied male doesn't look very pied to me. But I'm sure it's just because its too small of a picture to really tell. Steve thanks for posting this. Funny how the only contact information for Mr. Harrison is the e-mail he doesn't ever answer. By the way, Steve did you make sure they were properly sexed, just in case?
 
Also...the added numbers on the bottom are numbers already appearing on the 'list' so that may be the sellers way of giving documentation for individuals from within these clutches.

One thing that would have bothered me if I was the buyer (and this may seem trivial but I'm a pretty particular when spending that much money) the signature of Mr. Harrison does not appear to be an authentic signature and looks more like the script typeface printed from a computer...I highly doubt this would hold up in court if anyone attempted to seek legal action aganist Mr. Harrison for misrepresenting animals.
 
MLechner said:
The way I'm reading the documentation is that the animals listed are the offspring of a trio consisting of a pied male to 2 normal females, which would make the offspring 100% hets.
That is also my reading. It seems the two animals that are "added" at the bottom refer to two of the animals on the form.

MLechner said:
I'm also confused as to why Mr. Harrison could not tell if the returned snakes were his hets or not, since he appears to have photographed all of his offspring....I would think that having photos to compare to would make this pretty easy.
So am I confused by this. I would think that is the reason to have the pics in the first place.

Time will tell. Assuming they are a male and a female, give them a couple of clutches and come back to us in a few years with the results.

Until then....I think that I would pass on any of Katie's or Raymond Harrison's animals.
 
Please oh Please

Steve I've been dying to see that Harrison Clown can you post the paperwork for that one too? Thanks - Tosha
 
Back
Top