• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

KelliH and others Banned? Why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
jglass38 said:
Its sad what has happened to the site and the loss of some great members in the past and the latest round of ego driven bannings which suck even more of the life and expertise out of the site.


Wait a sec here!!! "EGO DRIVEN BANNINGS"??? Your telling me if you put your trust in someone and gave them a position of power and authority in your personal company only to find out they were bad mouthing your company and its people you would have done the EXACT SAME THING???
From a business point of view it had to be done. You cant have an employee bad mouthing the company and planning to take away a lot of its customers and not do anything about it.
From a personal standpoint you can let people run thier mouths about you and walk all over you and do nothing about it, what would be the result?? Everyone would do it. Rich now set the standard. He would like everyone to stay and enjoy the site, but if your going to be a member here then abide by the rules and dont try to hurt the site by actions such as these.
Chris johson started his own forum and told rich upfront aboutit, A lot of the members here including myself visited there quite often, and Chris remained a member here the whole time because he didnt do it behind everyones back.
If kelly would have came right out and said she's starting her own forum like chris did do you think she would have been banned?? Of course not!! Rich would have said the same thing to her as he did to Chris "have at it!!". All the leo family would have had two forums to enjoy instead being forced by peer pressure to take a stand with one site of the other.
 
nicolai said:
Wait a sec here!!! "EGO DRIVEN BANNINGS"??? Your telling me if you put your trust in someone and gave them a position of power and authority in your personal company only to find out they were bad mouthing your company and its people you would have done the EXACT SAME THING???
From a business point of view it had to be done. You cant have an employee bad mouthing the company and planning to take away a lot of its customers and not do anything about it.
From a personal standpoint you can let people run thier mouths about you and walk all over you and do nothing about it, what would be the result?? Everyone would do it. Rich now set the standard. He would like everyone to stay and enjoy the site, but if your going to be a member here then abide by the rules and dont try to hurt the site by actions such as these.
Chris johson started his own forum and told rich upfront aboutit, A lot of the members here including myself visited there quite often, and Chris remained a member here the whole time because he didnt do it behind everyones back.
If kelly would have came right out and said she's starting her own forum like chris did do you think she would have been banned?? Of course not!! Rich would have said the same thing to her as he did to Chris "have at it!!". All the leo family would have had two forums to enjoy instead being forced by peer pressure to take a stand with one site of the other.

And once again it goes back to the fact that what Kelli and the others said had no negative effect on Rich or his site. They weren't employees. They were volunteer moderators and made comments on another site. Removing them as moderators would have been sufficient and you know it.
 
jglass38 said:
As I will...I think many people have seen what really goes on here and it has left a bad taste in their mouths. Thanks for the advice!


Frankly the only bad taste left in my mouth is the fact that you continue with your asinine rhetoric of useless drivel. Good god oh frickin' mighty!!!!!! Did I just say that?? Wasn't a time not so long ago I was almost the same way. Damn I must have been a royal A#1 pain in the ass back then. ;)
 
nicolai said:
If kelly would have came right out and said she's starting her own forum like chris did do you think she would have been banned?? Of course not!! Rich would have said the same thing to her as he did to Chris "have at it!!". All the leo family would have had two forums to enjoy instead being forced by peer pressure to take a stand with one site of the other.
Hey Nick,
To be fair, Kelli hadn't told Rich about the site because it was still in beta testing. In other words, it hadn't been launched yet. She would have told him about it prior to it "going public."

I agree with you on the rest of it though. Rich was fully within his rights to take the action that he did.
 
jglass38 said:
And once again it goes back to the fact that what Kelli and the others said had no negative effect on Rich or his site. They weren't employees. They were volunteer moderators and made comments on another site. Removing them as moderators would have been sufficient and you know it.

Sorry but you are mistaken. From the invective I read on that thread, it was perfectly obvious that some of the participants with the capability had the ABILITY via the permissions on this site to actually cause damage. This was proven by a couple of past mods already. I had sufficient cause to be cognizant of that concern and acted to neutralize that possibility. That was a BUSINESS decision.
 
bcfos said:
Frankly the only bad taste left in my mouth is the fact that you continue with your asinine rhetoric of useless drivel. Good god oh frickin' mighty!!!!!! Did I just say that?? Wasn't a time not so long ago I was almost the same way. Damn I must have been a royal A#1 pain in the ass back then. ;)
LMAO! Yeah...you were! ;) :raspberry :rofl:
 
Dr Owens said:
Hey Nick,
To be fair, Kelli hadn't told Rich about the site because it was still in beta testing. In other words, it hadn't been launched yet. She would have told him about it prior to it "going public."
I will take your word on that.
 
I don't know that just starting a site, beta testing or not, was the stick that broke the camel's back anyway. The thread in it about Fauna, inviting the personal attacks and pointless criticisms, showed very poor taste, and represents the largest show of disloyalty IMO.
 
This is now getting WAY out of control.

Look at what is happening. People are starting to jump all over other people in here.

This entire situation is snowballing and growing out of control to the point of no return.

Too many people are now posting and saying things in the heat of the moment which is causing a rift in the herping community. I think it's about time that everyone took a breath and refrained from attacks, innuendos, hearsay, and everything else that is popping up.

There is a lot of animosity building that will eventually cause irreperable harm to everyone.

If all of this energy went into battling proposed legislations, there would be no bans on exotic reptiles in this country. Instead too many people are wasting their energy fighting and taking sides.

No one is going to win, no matter what "side" you take in this situation. No good can come from all of this fighting.

I have no ill will against any of the people involved in this conflict and it really bothers me to see what is happening. Not only with the ones directly involved but also with the ones who are now getting caught up in this.

I know emotions are running high right now but please think before you post so it doesn't add fuel to the fire.
 
Just a quick question.... if down the road some of the banned members have posts made about their business in the BOI, would they be allowed to make a rebuttal or is the ban infinite and without exception? The only reason I ask is that we all know the BOI is a powerful tool that could make or break a persons business, IF something negative is posted there and the subject company is not given the chance to rebut it could spiral out of control...
 
I would think that they would still be given the access to defend themselves on the BOI if a negative thread was started about them.
 
I think Banned is Banned 100%. I dont think WES, ROBIN or others have the ability to post on the BOI.
 
Steve, take a powder.

No one is going to win, no matter what "side" you take in this situation. No good can come from all of this fighting.

C'mon, is was not that long ago when major players here used to get quite profane and malicious in all manner of threads, and was a main reason Rich began the rather effective crackdown. True, this one involves otherwise well-respected folks, but their stature does not give them a free pass for some recent poor decisions. If this is a "step backwards", then so be it. Not the first time a step backwards was needed before moving forward again. The reptile community will sleep fine tonight. A few of the buttheads within it might be restless though. Your comments are well-meaning though, and things will work out and get on.
 
Hey, you know what? I'm tired of this. I'm going to sit down with the wife and a bowl of pretzels and watch a movie. Later on, I think maybe I'll approach Kelli directly and see if we can sort this out. If Jay has gotten the signals correctly, may this whole damned mess just originated from one colossal mistake in interpretations. So everyone, cool it please. I'm about beat up enough over this enough as it is. And I can't imagine Kelli is feeling all that grand about it either.
 
Dr Owens said:
Rich,
I spoke with Kelli at length last night, and it quite frankly it was the "fiasco comment" that started all of this. To make a long story short, she thought that you were referring to the Hayden auction as a fiasco...and it hurt her deeply (as the comment was taken out of context, i.e. misunderstood). I think that it's important to remember that Kelli has endured a hell over the past year that I wouldn't wish on any parent. IMO it's easy to understand how she could react emotionally to a perceived slight of an effort that was in memoriam of her son.

You and I both know that a certain amount of Chris' efforts were self "inflating," and Chris has certainly displayed his real character over the past several months. The important thing for everyone to recognize here is that the "fiasco" was between you and Chris...NOT between you and the efforts by many members of the reptile community to help Kelli and her family during their time of need. I know that you will agree with me that the efforts that people made to help Kelli and her family were NOT a fiasco.

In talking with Kelli, and explaining a little bit of the back story, and where you were coming from with your comment, she admitted that she had reacted emotionally to what you had said based on a misunderstanding of your intentions. Quite frankly, she was mad at you for things that you never really said (or meant to say)...she was hurt. I pointed out to Kelli that the main info that she had based her assumptions on was the info that Chris gave her when he called her almost a year ago and told her how you were trying to shut down the efforts of people trying to help her and her family. I also pointed out that I didn't believe for a second that what Chris told her wasn't extremely biased, and that Chris had every intention of painting you in a bad light to Kelli. So...here's poor Kelli, who has just suffered the most horrific loss that she could ever imagine, and Chris bombards her with this garbage. Do you think that she even had the capacity to objectively consider what Chris was telling her? No way...no one could have. She reacted emotionally, and was hurt and angry...just like any of us would have been. However, after everything was said and done, she chose to put those hurts aside and just "move on." She had already been through enough, and the last thing she needed was more drama, strife, or hurt in her life. However, it would have been impossible for her to forget it.

Now...fast forward almost a year, and you made the "fiasco" comment. Given the history, and the feelings that she had tried to put aside, it starts to become more clear as to why/how she could have taken what you said out of context. She was hurt, she was angry, she was in pain...a pain that few people could ever truly empathize with. Then, in what she thought was a private conversation, that pain came out...and you ended up being hurt by it.

As Kelli and I discussed everything, she made a very astute comment. She said that if Chris had truly been concerned for her well being, then he never would have made that call and told her the things that he did. Chris did what he did in an effort to hurt you, and in so doing he didn't just hurt you...he hurt Kelli. Chris only cared about making himself look good. Ultimately, Chris' action hurt you, Kelli, Fauna, Kelli's new forum, and the members of both.

Rich, Kelli does not hate you...she was hurt by you. There's a big difference. There is little doubt in my mind that if the two of you would just sit down and talk that you would realize that all of this drama is completely unnecessary. She doesn't want this, and I don't believe for a second that you do either...and neither one of you should fall prey to the people on both sides who are attempting to be self serving by trying to perpetuate the drama between the two or you.

Additionally, I know that Marcia regrets ever making the initial post as she has said so multiple times on the other forum. She is certainly not a hateful person. Rather she had a momentary lapse of judgment in which she vented her feelings of frustration in what she thought was a private conversation. Marcia regrets this, Kelli regrets this, and I am certain that you regret it. You are all three very intelligent, thoughtful people, and I hate to see your friendships torn apart by people who have nothing better to do than jump on board and fan the flames of the latest internet drama. None of this strife is necessary...how about picking up the phone? I know that Kelli would like to talk with you, and work this garbage out...she told me so.

Jay, That was darn good post and informative. I am also inclined to believe with what we now know about TSE, that your explanation is the most logical. I also went back, read Rich’s comments on Chris’s thread, and do believe they were meant as he stated here. I participated in the auctions and thought it was one of the greatest things to see happen within a community.

I wasn’t going to comment further, I also think Rich answered that he may give Kelli a call in a few days. I think that’s the best thing to do.

I’m going to add one more thing that I find troubling. I thought it better to just let it rest then stir things anymore but it may be useful to all. I would ask Kelli and others to think back to when the issue first started and who it was that first sparked the issue over the funds on both sites. It wasn’t Lucille or Rich. It wasn’t even Chris. You know, I think that person was invited over to Kelli’s site as well. Just a little food for thought.
 
WebSlave said:
Hey, you know what? I'm tired of this. I'm going to sit down with the wife and a bowl of pretzels and watch a movie. Later on, I think maybe I'll approach Kelli directly and see if we can sort this out. If Jay has gotten the signals correctly, may this whole damned mess just originated from one colossal mistake in interpretations. So everyone, cool it please. I'm about beat up enough over this enough as it is. And I can't imagine Kelli is feeling all that grand about it either.

*If* the signals are true, I hope it works out. Hope springs eternal, and living in true harmony is much better than otherwise. This is a reptile site, not a war zone. I for one want to get back to ordinary posts, reptile stuff, maybe a poll or two....
Yes, my feelings were hurt by those posts. It wouldn't hurt to spread those olive branches around a little.
 
What an argument this has turned out to be.

A double-edged sword indeed, cutting deep into both sides. Hopefully things can be worked out and this "sword" can be sheathed.

PS: Life can be quite a wild ride, things happen and people are hurt. :censored: happens, if not him it was her etc etc. Hang Loose and enjoy what you have, life is to short to spend arguing over petty things.
 
From Rich:
I think maybe I'll approach Kelli directly and see if we can sort this out.

That would be great for you ,Kelli, Fauna Classified's and our little community. Thanks, Jay for your posts.
 
Webslave said:
And what exactly IS my attitude?
You asked.

Webslave said:
So exercise your own free will to move on to somewhere else other then THAT thread,or THAT forum. Threads do not open themselves up and tackle you as a reader. YOU have to specifically click on it to open it up and read it. So if you see the title of some thread that looks like it may contain something offensive to you, please don't let it twist your arm or wrestle you to the ground in order to make you read it. Resist it, as impossible as that may seem to do.
The person you responded so RUDELY, ARROGANTLY and with an ATTITUDE to was asking for opinions. This person DID NOT attack you at all and the above quote is what you wrote.


Webslave said:
So obviously a few people here are trying hard to make that molehill into a mountain, eh? Man, you guys really crack me up. That thread would have fallen to the bottom of the pile if you hadn't kept bringing it to the surface and calling everyone's attention to it. Gasp! Hey! Look at that post! People shouldn't have to look at something like that so take a look at it yourself! But I suppose that irony is lost on those people.
Now who is making a molehill into a mountain? You did the exact same thing with the thread from Geckoforums.net. Irony yeah.


Webslave said:
If you don't like it, then don't go there. It is quite a simple concept to grasp. If you believe the sky will be falling shortly because of it, well start digging that shelter for yourself and make your own preparations. Personally I doubt that will be the case at all.
The above is quite antagonistic. If anyone else BUT the owner of the site wrote that and a mod noticed it, they would probably get warning points.


You ask for opinions and when they are not in agreement with your opinion, you get an attitude:
Webslave said:
Well you know what, beat it. Right now. Don't even wait around for me to finally decide on this issue and implement it. If that is the way you feel, then quite frankly, I really don't care if you stay here or not. Because if that is the way you feel about me and this site, then I really don't want you around anyway.


You post a poll asking people's opinion on charging $10 for the BOI and when 19 people disagreed with you, you post this:
Webslave said:
And people will tell me they will leave if I charge a "piss ant" fee of $10? Quite frankly, YOU don't deserve to USE my site or take anything of value from it. Matter of fact, I have just this moment decided that I AM going to implement this plan. If for no other reason then to give you 19 people the incentive you need to leave. So there. Get your butts off of my site. I am not going to check to see who you are, and I am not going to force you off. All I am doing is saying I am calling your hand with the cards I have on the table.
Quite an attitude you show there. And FYI at first I was all for helping you monetarily with this site. I have NOTHING to gain from YOU. I have no business, I am not selling anything, I am a nobody so don't think that I benefit from YOU because I don't. I believe the only reason anyone is still posting here and don't agree with you is because they care about this site and hate to see the way it's being run now. That's why I'm still slogging. I used to love this site but ever since Lucille came aboard, you have changed, the site has changed . . . for the worse.


And frankly I don't know why you bother to even ask people's opinions.
Webslave said:
I should close the poll since I have come to a decision, but what the heck. Let's allow some more people to show their displeasure at my decision.
Narcissism at its best there.


Webslave said:
And yes, perhaps I do get exasperated at the things some people will try to blow up into issues.
Golly, you do the same thing.


Webslave said:
It really is none of your damned business. If I wanted to charge everyone a fee to even step foot in this site, then it would be my right to do so. If I wanted to turn this site into one dedicated to sexual relationships between humans and animals, then yes, I could do that too.
Not derogatory at all, no siree.


Webslave said:
Now you do. I am not swayed by a vocal minority voice.
It is obvious that you are not swayed by a vocal MAJORITY voice either.


jglass38 said:
And once again it goes back to the fact that what Kelli and the others said had no negative effect on Rich or his site. They weren't employees. They were volunteer moderators and made comments on another site. Removing them as moderators would have been sufficient and you know it.
In fact if Rich hadn't of jumped the gun and banned people and posted a link to the other site, only a small number of people would have even known about what was written over there. Let's see, who benefits by all this being brought out into the open? Oh yeah, tons & tons of hits on this site. After reviewing past posts by Rich & crew, I find that the numbers mean quite a lot to them, a lot more than I ever would have believed if I didn't read posts myself. Also most of those posts are by the same 10 people over n over agreeing with you and bashing anyone with a different opinion.

And it was you, Rich, who caused yourself to lose revenue by banning paying members, remember that.

In going through the past posts, it looks like you thrive on making mountains out of molehills. For someone with a lot of animals to care for and websites to care for, you certainly spend a lot of time writing derogaory comments and varitable books in threads.


And Lucille
lucille said:
devastation heaped on Fauna, Rich, and some others
That is one of the funniest sentences I've ever read. Some people don't like you and state that fact on another site and you call it "devastation heaped on Fauna, Rich and some others"? Methinks you are going overboard and are very melodramatic. Please excuse me while I cough up a lung because I've been laughing my rear end off ever since I read that little ditty :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top