• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

KelliH and others Banned? Why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I have given this issue a good week to settle down and allow me to consider what I SHOULD do here about it. Conflicting emotions, to be certain, but enough time has passed that the edge is off of it and the wounds a felt inflicted have healed a bit.

It's alway a shock, I guess, to see blatant evidence of ill will bordering on hatred from someone directed at yourself. I expect people to dislike me for some of the decisions I have to make, but honestly, I expect that from the bad guys really not people I consider as "good guys". So I expect anyone faced with a slap in the face like that would probably react as I did. Shock, hurt, then later on anger. But the shock wears off quickly, as does the anger, but the hurt still lingers the longest.

But let me back up a bit and explain some of the background happenings that sort of primed me for the response I made.

Back around mid April, not long after I implemented the adding on of a bunch of forum moderators here, I had an issue arise where one of the moderators who also had his own personal forum got involved in a situation involved several other members not real pleased with my choice in moderator for one of the forums. What these people conspired to do, with the blessings of the moderator, was to use his personal forum to post threads of the topic matter more appropriate to be posted in the forum for that topic. In effect, using this personal forum to kind of compete with the regular forum and obviously done to antagonize the moderator of the regular forum. When I became aware of this, I contacted several of the people involved in this childish behavior and sent the following PM to the person who was using his personal forum for this purpose:

I know I more or less turned over your own personal forum to you at your own discretion, but I have noticed a LOT of bearded dragon posts in your own forum, and this is causing me heartburn. I am trying hard to get the discussion forums active, and it appears I am seeing some sort of competition between what is posted in your forum as opposed to my preference that such topics go to the proper forum on this site. It is contrary to my goals to have a secondary forum elsewhere on this site when those posts are more appropriate in the focused topic discussion forum I have set up.

The personal forums are just that, about personal stuff. I know that can include animals you are interested in, but if I find that such a forum winds up drawing off topics from the regular discussion forums, with the likelihood that no one LOOKING in the Bearded Dragon forum will be able to have the benefit of finding such posts, well it just seems to be undermining what I am trying to do here.

It just doesn't make sense for me to keep such a program if it divides the already slim traffic going to the regular discussion forums. I do hate to have to strong arm you about this, but I want to move those Bearded Dragon threads over to the Bearded Dragon Discussion forum. And in the future, I would like to have you use your Personal Forum in a manner that does not compete with another forum on this site.

Believe me, this is awkward for me to bring to you, and I am probably flubbing it badly, but I am trying damned hard to get the discussion forums flowing, and it rightly irks me to see this happening. I know you can't control what other people are doing, but I would also like to think you are not encouraging it either.

If you decide you would rather not have a personal forum under these conditions, I understand and will refund your payment for it immediately and remove it. It probably was a bad idea of mine anyway.

A lot of PMs passed between us, and the person indicated above that he was leaving this site, apparently because of the discussion we were having. So with that in mind, I removed him from being a moderator of the forum he was in charge of. Now in this discussion, I made a statement that will be significant later on, but let me post it here while it is in mind:

And that is how I have to call it. I cannot judge someone by what they did elsewhere and elsewhen. All I can go by is what I see HERE and NOW.

Well, long story made a little shorter, a couple of weeks later this person winds up completely DELETING all of the threads in his personal forum, in what I would have to opinion was a spiteful gesture. At which point I removed his moderator rights for his own personal forum. No other penalties were forthcoming except a PM to this member thanking him for that particular display.

So now we fast forward a bit to the closing days of May when I had another moderator of one of my forums getting into a rather heated discussion with another moderator over a thread posted within the Lonely Hearts Club Forum. From the tone of his postings and the fact that he actually threatened this other moderator with legal actions, I felt it unwise to keep him in the moderator position, and in so doing, sent him a PM explaining my actions and apologizing for what I felt was a necessary step.

Obviously this did not go over well either, with the results that this particular moderator deleted many of the posts he had made within he forum he was an ex-moderator for by simply editing out the text and replacing it with "######". At which point I banned him to stop immediately any further aims on his part of continuing with that activity.

Now bear in mind all along I was also fielding the issue about that thread in the Lonely Hearts Club as well as taking some pretty harsh invective from one member highly incensed that I took exception at his posting derogatory comments towards someone else in the BOI. So I was about tired of this crap coming from a lot of different directions.

Which brings us to the PM I received from someone around 2 am on 06/02 indicating I should view an interesting thread on Kelli Hammack's new forum.

Which was quite an eye opener, I have to admit, when what I had really wanted to do was to hit the hay. But I saw clear and present evidence of people I had entrusted with being moderators on this site (among others) plainly and obviously filled with hatred towards myself, this site, and some of my other moderators here. Now after the above two incidents mentioned above with former moderators deleting posts and threads, the first thought that popped into my head was that these people filled with such obvious hatred had the ability, and apparently the will, to cause myself and this site some significant damage. A moderator not only had the ability to edit and delete their own posts and threads, they could do that same thing to EVERY thread and post made by anyone within their forum. Sorry, but I just could NOT take that risk. And the quickest way to block such a possibility was to just outright ban then on the spot. Even only removing the moderator's powers was not sufficient because with the memberships they also had, this gave them the ability to edit and delete their own posts as was made starkly evident to me earlier. And yes, I did go a bit overboard and banned a few people who were not moderators. No excuse on my part except I guess that the shock and anger took over. Honestly, I just did not want those people on this site right then and that was the clearest way I could think of to send that signal to them. So with that out of the way, I sent an email to Kelli thanking her for what I read on her site, and went to bed for the night.

So here we are today.

Quite honestly the shock has worn off as has the anger and hurt. I guess what I feel now is mostly disappointment. Kelli obviously holds a deep rooted grudge against me for that issue involving Chris Johnson about a year ago, and my explanations of what happened have just fallen on deaf ears. Obviously she has chosen to not believe my perspective of it. Which is completely up to her. I have my opinion on the matter and she has hers, so that is that. And I guess some of the other people involved in that thread on her site were also greatly influenced by that event as well, so they just chose what they want to believe or not. That is their choice.

The shocking part of this was that they chose to basically hide those true feelings and yet still use this site as sponsors, advertisers, and even moderators for some of the forums. That, in my opinion, was just decietful. If they truly had those feelings, then why be here at all? Why pretend that this issue I spoke of had been ironed out and although certainly not healed over, at least at a point where there were no teeth grinding grudges. Yeah, I did see some subtle signs, such as those members posting positive karma for members who were beating up on me, but I guess I stupidly chose to ignore such things. I chose to select some of them as moderators even knowing about this undercurrent, but I decided that maybe it wasn't that bad and I was just seeing boogeymen under the bed.

Well, as some people say, "my bad". Lesson learned, yet again. I certainly cannot believe what has been told to me by the principal characters, so I have no choice but to make my own best guesses about what I have seen and what is really going on. So all I can say is "more power to you, Kelli. And your friends as well." I have never meant you any harm and I am sorry that you have interpretted anything I have done under that light. I have tried my best to explain my perspective with the truth, and that is really all I can do. You obviously have your own reasons for choosing what you wish to believe in, but that does not change the truth of my own involvement.

So, as far as I am concerned, this is really over and done with. Which brings me back to something I quoted up at the top of this rather long winded post:

And that is how I have to call it. I cannot judge someone by what they did elsewhere and elsewhen. All I can go by is what I see HERE and NOW.

That quote above is pretty much representative of my attitude about what is important about what I decide to do about members on this site. And I am certain I have said it many more times then in just that PM. What it means is that I should only judge people by what they do HERE and no where else. Not by what people may say to me about you that you said elsewhere, not by what I may see by my own eyes that you have posted elsewhere. As the admin for this site, what you do here is what I have to take into consideration as my criteria for how to treat you here. With one caveat that I think needs to be emphasized. Moderators on this site are expected to be, and will be, held to a higher level of responsibility for their actions elsewhere. Moderators are representatives of this site whereever else they may go. Someone who is a moderator for this site really should not engage in the type of talk I personally witnessed some ex-moderators here engaging in on Kelli's site. And Kelli, who was a moderator here, also engaging in that sort of talk, not just passively allowing it there. In a similar case such as this, such a person will be rendered incapable of inflicting potential damage to this site while they are here. This, I believe, is only being prudent. Any moderator who feels that they cannot live up to this responsibility really should not be holding that position here.

Now that doesn't mean that I have to personally like you, and anyone engaging in such invective towards me can pretty much guarantee that you won't be real high on my list of people I would want to spend time with, but as for the criteria for deciding if someone should be banned from this site, what you actually DO here has to be what I use for that kind of judgment call. And it does have to be this way. I have no interest in scouring the internet looking for people talking bad about me, this site, or other members here. That is up to the admins of those particular sites to have to deal with in whatever manner they choose to do so. I have no illusions about being popular and everyone liking me. Quite the contrary, as I see nearly every day people resenting the simple fact that I have rules here and do make an effort to enforce them. Comes with the turf and I accept that as just being the way it is.

So while I can still keep my eyes open, I need to finish this up as this has taken a much longer time to write then you are taking reading it.

So what does this all boil down to? Based on my above statements about my responsibility and authority in how I treat members here, I do not feel that it is in keeping with those statements to continue the bans against those people who were banned for the statements that made on Kelli's site. It just simply flies in the face of what I want to have as my stated responsibility. Now do I personally "like" those people and wish to welcome them back with open arms? Heck no. And likewise do I even expect that any of them WILL come back here? Again, heck no. But that will be their choice and not because of my locking the door on them. As the admin for this site, I believe that this is just the correct and proper way for me to have to administer fairness.

So I will be lifting those bans, but not until tomorrow as right now I am going to bed.

NOTE: Sorry, but I am just too tired to proofread this post. If I decide to do it later on, I will edit as necessary to correct the butchered statements. Sorry.....
 
I feel like I just read a novel. ;)

A fair and even handed decision Rich. Well done. :)
 
Dr Owens said:
I feel like I just read a novel. ;)

A fair and even handed decision Rich. Well done. :)

Regardless of my past issues with Rich, I agree on both points. Very fair and exactly what was needed to ratchet down the tension. Although time seems to have contributed to that as well.
 
Rich, you have made some wise decisions and it proves that you are a stand up guy. I hope all the nay sayers read this......
 
Ditto's. Hopefully you will not find yourself facing a similar situation in the future, but it would be naive to expect yu will not. Almost every team, business, or organization has some form of suspension, "administrative leave", etc, for members who find themselves under internal investigation, pending review, etc. During this time they are suspended from both responsibility and power. "Banned" may be a tough term to swallow, but I don't know if other options are possible. I have concured with your actions here from the beginning, and thank you for coming back with a "novel" of an explanation, allowing time for emotions to subside, and objective review to prevail.
 
Nice mini novel. Good to see it all come together and end on a better note.
 
Great decision, Rich. I try to stay out of the politics but sometimes you get dragged in - like the former record setting MackGate thread which was transferred to the BOI. After tuning out for a few months I came back and read page after page of blatant threats from several keyboard ninjas, primarily some guy who was at that time the new gecko messiah. His name was Chris something. My reply was "I'll be in Daytona and won't be hard to find", along with a polygraph that I paid $180 for. You requested that I remove the post or get warning points so I removed it and still got a point. It's your site and I feel that it's our responsibility as guests to obey the rules. It's also interesting how some of my halo bearing detractors in those posts whose ethics were beyond reproach have shown that they're not above a good bit of sneakiness - or is that snakeiness? Having received several invitations to the "new site", I held off signing up (until now) but must confess to peeking in a few times. Even though we don't agree with everything the oil companies do, we still buy their gas. There are many great people on both sides of the fence. Thank you for such a quick cool down for the good of the community.
 
Fair result I would say.. I do not agree with people bashing another site or members of a site that they take part in, moderate and pull business from, as it does put forth an image if childishness. Honestly, I cant see why someone would even start a post like that... Doesnt make any sense... Do people actually believe that it wouldnt be found? The internet is VERY large, but VERY small sometimes... you cant just talk like that and expect it not to be found by someone else... I am jsut getting in on this topic now, and It will be my last post to it i would imagine... I jsut had to put in my 2 cents worth... It shows that Rich is a bigger person than them in the long run.. he was mad, hurt and angry... everyone says / does things out of impulse to seeing somehting like that, and he then reinstated people that he felt he wanted to... Again, I say good end to a messed up and dirty situation..
 
90 pages of contempt, degradation. whining, criticism and bickering.
It was worth 90 pages? Seriously....90 pages??? :ack2:
Why dont you guys can go for an even 100 pages...come on...you can do it. :toiletcla

Christoipher Frank
[email protected]
 
Hate to disappoint you #66 ...

But depending on your display mode, it may shrink to only about 46 pages :rofl: I kind of like the idea of when someone shows their :bleep:, they get the boot. Rich, I think we have another volunteer !
 
Pardon? I believe my spelling and grammar were correct.
Did i mention something that offended you?I don't believe there was anything offensive with what i wrote ...or are you just trying to prove me correct???
:rofl:
 
Chameleon Company said:
But depending on your display mode, it may shrink to only about 46 pages :rofl: I kind of like the idea of when someone shows their :bleep:, they get the boot. Rich, I think we have another volunteer !

It's only 12 pages for me, Jim :raspberry
 
[QUOTEI kind of like the idea of when someone shows their :bleep:, they get the boot. [/QUOTE]

DONT LOOK ETHEL!!!! but it was too late. :blush:
 
christopher66 said:
90 pages of contempt, degradation. (maybe a comma here) whining, criticism and bickering.
It was worth 90 pages? Seriously....90 pages??? :ack2:
Why dont you guys can go for (????) an even 100 pages...come on...you can do it. :toiletcla

Christoipher Frank
[email protected]
I might be from Texas but even we don't speak like that.....
 
norsmis said:
I might be from Texas but even we don't speak like that.....

I appreciate you pointing out the misuse of the comma,you see, the comma key and the period key are next to another ,so i probably struck the wrong key.
And I'm not sure were you got the rest of that "quote " from,but it does not appear to be the post i wrote.
See.. you and I can reach 100 pages ourselves. :rolleyes:
 
christopher66 said:
90 pages of contempt, degradation. whining, criticism and bickering.
It was worth 90 pages? Seriously....90 pages??? :ack2:
Why dont you guys can go for an even 100 pages...come on...you can do it. :toiletcla

Christoipher Frank
[email protected]
Your quote exactly my friend...... "Why dont you guys can go for an even 100 pages...." You see nothing wrong with that?????

Christopher, you come her and complain about contempt, degradation, whining, criticism and bickering but it seems you came here to be part of the fray......:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top