Serpwidgets said:
Since the ACR has been brought up and referenced several times in this discussion, I would just like to point out that the ACR was not created with the purpose of being able to stop anyone from mislabeling stuff or to control labeling standards for classifieds or auctions or shows. It seems like this is a central theme in the discussions I've read about getting a registry going for leos, and I wanted it to be noted that the ACR is not involved in any way in setting, establishing, maintaining, enforcing, encouraging, or discouraging any standards.
Thank you for posting, Serp. Your input is always appreciated!
The LGR's goal is not to "control" standards either. However, I myself (and I know many others) get thoroughly disgusted with some of the outragous claims we see on some auctions, classifieds and forums. Steven and I have been talking, and we may simply use a "panel of judges" to make a final decision on the more questionable registrations (IE Normals registered as SHTCT). That "panel of judges" would be "voted into office" by the Leopard Gecko Community itself,
not by the LGR. If it is a serious concern of the Leo Community that the LGR may disregard any control on what gets registered as what. We don't want to do that, but in the end, this is about the Leo Community as a whole and not about us as the founders.
KelliH said:
Role model? Well, I try to be an honest person that helps others, but I am only a gecko breeder.
Kelli, I think a lot of people look up to you (I know I do) and think of you more then just a "gecko breeder."

That in now way shape or form is a push to have to be an active member with the LGR. It is simply meant as a compliment.
WindyO said:
The idea of a public lineage site is appealing. I just am leary of problems that could stem from this.
Feel free to email me and discuss your apprehention privately if you wish. I am all to happy to listen to your concerns (among everyone elses) and answer any questions.
dragonflyreptiles said:
So my higer $$ purchases to insure a line being into my colony are now worthless without a ton of hassle of having multiple sellers confirm the line when it is sold and resold.
I think worthless is an extremely harsh word to use. Anyone is free to place in the comments section what line their gecko originated from. Yes, we will be verifying it for most individuals. As an example, if KelliH was to register one of her geckos as a particular line (not established by herself), the LGR would certainly not research the fact. She herself has a wonderful reputation that speaks for itself, and I think it would be a slap in the face for the LGR to question her on her lines.
WindyO said:
I'm sorry but why would you pay for a $600 gecko from her when you could under-cut her for $550. With these documents you could and probably would show them that they have the same exact lineage for $50 less.
The point of the LGR is certainly
not to undercut anyones sales. Regardless of the LGR (or the ACR), that does happen. It personally disgusts me when I see Rich's Lav Stripes for sale for $2000 and I find an unknown breeder selling the same morph for $800. Come on, that's ludacris. Personally, I'd
rather have Rich's line because of who it was coming from.
dragonflyreptiles said:
It also means that any leo not bought direct from a ***BREEDER*** that cannot be confirmed direct or without tracing people down is a pain. Now Id love to claim my Urban male as my own breeder that I bought second hand but then some would complain about that, as oh she has an Urban listed as an original breeder.
Do not worry about tracking people down, that is the LGR'S responsibility. I'm thinking (from reading your post) that maybe you're thinking that the "new line" in the"family tree" part means that you had to originally breed the animal. That is not true. If your name is not listed as the breeder, no one should consider you the breeder of that animal.