As I read over this thread the last few minutes I found lots of points to address. I will forgo them at this point.
In the end my thoughts lie not with if such advertising should be allowed, Rather that I would want to know where my animals were going.
If a advertisement is blatant then there is no question, right?
Well who would send their animals off to slaughter? Some would and some wouldn't.
If someone on here is asking for wholesale lots (which many dealers and breeders do) then you would have no idea where the animals end destination could be. They could be resold to a foreign buyer. They can end up in a hell house and die a slow painful death of neglect.
At least with the knowledge of the destination you can make a informed decision. Sell and buy to who you choose.
How many low grade lots of snakes, or normals sold here ended up as food for someone or some other pet? How many here asked before they sold? If you did, are you sure you got a honest answer?
It seems to me that if you care, you would rather see it in the ad and take note not deal with that person.
If someone doesn't care, do you think that it matters?
How is not allowing the mention of the animals destination going to stop anything?
If not illegal to sell and export and they don't mention the destination, you would never know, correct?
So other than feeling good that you didn't see it mentioned in the Ad what would be accomplished from banning such a classified?
For Hong Kong market Common Snapping Turtles (WC) Adults
It would simply be changed to
large wholesale lots wanted. Can you beat this price?
So who loses out? Surly not the guy who needs a large amount turtles to send wherever. And not the guy who needs to move a lot turtles fast and doesn't care where they are going. I think the only person that loses is the person who would have second thoughts or wouldn't send their animals to slaughter because they weren't allowed to be informed.
I'd rather know instead of feeling all warm inside that we didn't allow people to tell them in the ads.
I'm going to waffle a little here and go back to couple of points I was thinking about as I read this thread.
I'll just say splitting hares about feeders raised for consumption of other animals "our preferred pets" as some how noble and tasteful in comparison food harvested for humans is a bit ridiculous.
Go over to a rat fancier site and explain to them the noble endeavor you have undertaken to support the animal you care to breed, collect and propagate. Just maybe they will repeat that out of place Gandhi quote that someone posted on this thread. How we treat our pets.. After all, our pets are better.
Actually, I think that's a good point. Would someone who breeds pet rodents like to know if you are using them as feeders? If they are breed as pets, of course they do. They would like to know if you are using them as feeders and decline if they choose.
It is better to know than not to know so you may make a informed choice.
Most will not be as stupid to go to a site where a particular animal is cherished as a pet and advertise they are buying for food. Most would not advertise that fact. Many would be deceptive that would post in such places.
It's interesting how we can all look at a situation differently when most of us might feel the same way.
For me it is, thanks for letting me know not send you my animals.
For others, "ban him, delete his ads."
Others, "oh this site allows this, I'm leaving and many or coming with me." "I'm not contributing anymore"
To each his own. I think mines rational. Well, it's mine of course I do.
One last thing, If you think Rich bends a knee to threats or whines from advertisers for dollars, or anyone threatening him to leave or not contribute over a issue you haven't been on this site long enough.