Chameleon Company
New member
"The benefit of the doubt" is certainly shrinking to a microscopic size, and I believe that those who spoke well of Lovell were doing so as an invitation for him to get a handle on this before it did any further damage to his business or reputation. Day, I did not re-read all the posts to see if you had already done this, or the suggestion made, but another small arrow in yor quiver would be to file a complaint with Kingsnake. They have policies governing such, although I believe there's a threshold of number-of-complaints before they ban someone, but its a start, and maybe it can at least compel Lovell to communicate with you and find a solution. Check their TOS and/or compalint policy, and I think you'll find a course of action to follow there. In the meantime, it doesn't matter what Lovell's position is at this point ... we don't know anyway. Whether it be financial woes, disagreement with the terms of your order, illness, etc, he has an absolute obligaton to communicate with you, as he has had, and if he finds no satisfaction in private, he can always avail himself of this forum, as he has in the past.

I can't make the necessary assumption to consider it "sad". If the assumption is that the people who looked it up were clueless about it prior, then maybe so. But is it not more likely that when people look up a word, that they have some idea of its meaning and usage, but want to know more? I frankly see it as reassuring that people want to know more about ethics, and the words we use to describe them.