• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Mike Greathouse [you decide]

Wow – this is pretty amazing Rich.

Was this the method that you finally settled upon to increase the waning traffic on Fauna? I guess by turning Fauna into the National Inquirer, you very likely will enjoy an increased activity level. What’s next – an alien abduction forum?

Before I begin, I would like to thank those who have shown support and those who have shown restraint in responding to speculation. I would also like to point out the post made by John Schmitt, was his own and was not requested by me, as has been implied by some. I have simply not had the opportunity to read this until this morning.

Let’s set the record straight here once and for all. I’ll start with the serious allegation and work my way down.

I had absolutely no involvement in a DDOS attack on this or any other site.

Additionally, there have never been any attempts, or even thoughts, of any sabotage to your servers. I resent the implication and, although I am no longer surprised by your actions, I can say I never saw a statement like that coming from you. The expense you incurred moving your servers is a direct result of your own paranoia. You never received any indication from me that I would even consider something like that.

Yes – the Shrillomn persona was created by me.
This began as a good-natured parody of one of your very outspoken members. I do admit that it took on a life of it’s own and got out of hand. It has been some time since I read any of those old posts, but if anyone’s feelings were hurt by the comments made – I apologize.

No – I did not create the Sledgehammer persona.
My contact with Ben (if that is his real name) was strictly via activity on a couple of forums and private emails. As far as I know, he is another reptile enthusiast.

No – I did not create the Walk of Life persona.
This is the identity that I find the most disturbing. This individual seems to have intentionally created similarities between himself and me. The name, the interests, and the timing of his appearance on Fauna and Digital Herper. All of these things were just subtle enough to not be completely obvious.

I cannot explain the IP match with Walk of Life, other then to offer some possibilities.

I connect to the internet from a number of different sources.
My cell phone is internet capable, I always carry an IPAQ which is internet capable and use it frequently in my travels. I make frequent use of public WIFI for internet access.

One of the most common is that of Brighthouse Networks public WIFI access which has hotspots in multiple locations in several surrounding counties. I find this to be a very convenient method, given my routine. The downside to this is that you are sharing an IP address with potentially thousands of people on any given day.

The IP address that I am posting from now is from my home account. Note: Roadrunner owns a block of IP address and they routinely change. My purpose for going into all of this detail is to clarify the reason why there are so many IP addresses associated with my account.

I recently experienced a complete failure of my computer and was forced to build a new system from scratch. One of the issues that I overlooked, was securing the wireless router. It wasn’t until all of this came up that I even thought to check it.

Now it seems a stretch that someone would create a false account on a forum that I used to frequent, open up a dialog with me on my own forum, and then a couple of months later, essentially park in front of my house to grab my IP.

But barring the use of software/hardware IP manipulation, (which is not particularly difficult based upon what has been said by several posters) I cannot currently offer any other solution. The bottom line is this, I am not this Walk of Life character, and am somewhat concerned about his motives and ultimate goals. Whether you believe what I have said or not, it smacks of someone who joined into the game with an agenda.

I trust that I have sufficiently answered the questions put forth here. If not, I am sorry, but I made a decision to back away from Fauna some time ago, and I think the timing is right to make that a permanent situation.

To those good friends who have not jumped to a judgement until hearing my response…I thank you. To those good friends who have posted on my behalf, I thank you even more.

To the rest…take this as you will.

Good luck to you all.


Mike Greathouse
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chameleon Company said:
During the height of the Shrilomn postings, another member "positively" identified me as the culprit. I took enormous offense, not so much because there was no proof, but because I saw it as an afront to my integrity, to suggest that I would stoop to using an alias to say anything disparaging about another here. Regardless of personalities, that is a significant threshold to many. I certainly found the action repulsive, with no added explanation required.

I'm still not completely convinced...... ;) When I was at your home last September, I saw the secret hideaway with separate lan lines running into it with the warm glow of multiple computer monitors.... All to convenient if you ask me! You know it was done out of love don't you Jim? :)

Griz
 
Mike,

Thanks for coming and telling your side of the story. It has not changed how I feel about anything. I do think some of the posts were cowardly at times and some that had plenty of merit behind them.

It does bother me that some folks got very upset with one another over your antics as Shrill. Whatever your ultimate goal was as Shrill, causing that to happen overshadowed any good you tried to accomplish.

All in all I never have and still do not believe you to be a bad guy. More than anything I think you just took your game a little too far. I think all of us can relate to that. Taking something too far and it getting out of hand.

As I said earlier, I think some folks are making too much out of this. Although I do think a couple people have a very good right to be upset with you.
 
I'm sorry Kelli, I did not hear you, did you say ghost accounts? Or troll accounts? I only have one, and it is all me!! However, do these "Ghost" accounts use them to make personal attacks? As well as attacks against the site? And by all means, don't hold back now, spill the beans!!

I wasn't referring to you, Bobby. :shrug01:
 
SPJ said:
You know what upsets me the most about this thread?
The fact that some of you who claim Mike was a great friend and person, have completely turned their backs on him without ever hearing from him.
In an instant someone has gone from being labeled a good guy to a scumbag without even waiting to hear from the person accused of things in this thread.

Can't help but to agree here Steve. I wonder how many of the " friends " that talked to Mike regularly on the phone picked it up to ask him if he was Shrillomn before publicly condemning the man. Was it easier to whip out the noose than dialing a number they are supposedly familiar with?

The way some of the wording has been used in some posts , Mike never had a chance to begin with. Some of the longer term members here know that any speculation mixed with proof of other things takes a life of its own.

I can't help but to wonder but why the reference was made to DDOS attack in the first post to begin with if the OP truly doesn't think Mike is a bad guy and was merely stirring the pot. Its hard for me to take this thread seriously and even harder to take some of the members as seriously as they take themselves.

I can't help but wonder about some of the motives behind this thread and some of the posts made in it.
 
Mike Greathouse said:
Yes – the Shrillomn persona was created by me.
This began as a good-natured parody of one of your very outspoken members. I do admit that it took on a life of it’s own and got out of hand. It has been some time since I read any of those old posts, but if anyone’s feelings were hurt by the comments made – I apologize.

No – I did not create the Sledgehammer persona.
My contact with Ben (if that is his real name) was strictly via activity on a couple of forums and private emails. As far as I know, he is another reptile enthusiast.

No – I did not create the Walk of Life persona.
This is the identity that I find the most disturbing. This individual seems to have intentionally created similarities between himself and me. The name, the interests, and the timing of his appearance on Fauna and Digital Herper. All of these things were just subtle enough to not be completely obvious.

I cannot explain the IP match with Walk of Life, other then to offer some possibilities.

There are no other possibilities other than the truth. And the truth as I can see it is that you seem to have some problems with the truth. I think you handed us a bunch of poppy cock. I think you admitted to one bogus registration to make us think that because you admitted to one that there is really no good reason you would not to admit to the others.

I have a hard time believing the characters you created were for parody. You threatened me in a PM as shrillomn, to dig up a two year old thread about me if I didn't cease badgering you. You tried to silence me with a threat. That's not funny. That's not in good fun. You are an asshole....in character and out of character. Plain and simple. I don't care what good you've done in the hobby. You are a sick asshole. Get yourself some help.
 
Mike,
While I'm not sure that it's fair to call you a "bad guy"...you are most definitely a LIAR. Plain and simple.

You lied about not being Shrillomn, you're lying about not being Walk of Life, and while I can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you were Sledgehammer, there is most definitely more than enough circumstantial evidence to convince any reasonable person that it was you...especially in light of the fact that you already have a track record of lying, deceiving, and manipulating people on this forum both through posting, and through the karma system.

I had hoped that you would decide to start being honest, but I guess I was wrong. It has become obvious that your "version" of honesty is to only to be as honest as you "have to"...or in other words, continue to lie as long as you think that you can get away with it. That's just sad.
 
He is Shrillomn, and was not only Shrillomn, but also tried to bypass the Shrillomn ban, and was banned again, bottom line!! So there were really four trolls, not three.


So, what is to really be said?

Shrillomn: Now, it seems that some people have the impression that I only want to nitpick and cuss and swear and take advantage of others. Well, you are essentially correct. I do enjoy a good argument, whether the wording be “mom” friendly or not, and it is my sole desire to “have at it” with any and all. There is no method to my madness, but there is indeed a bit of madness to my method.

I do what I do ONLY because I want to or, if the want is not there as it is not on occasion, because I feel I must. The doctors say that the meds will help, but as I already said, I do what I do only because I want to. I seek NO ONES approval. If you happen to agree with me, that’s a bonus and if you don’t agree with me, well, I never asked for your opinion anyway.

Thus endeth the explanation of the motivation of Shrillomn.


Mike Greathouse: This is amazing.

Here we are in a thread that I believe began as a parody by someone who refuses to identify themself; and it has progressed into a pissing match about karma and he said / she said jabs by some of the more respected people on this site.

Is anybody else seeing the irony in all of this?

This thread is located in the General BS section for a reason - it is not real.
It doesn't belong on the BOI and the only purpose that it serves is that of entertainment value.
I think everyone needs to step back and remember what's important.

So Shrillomn was created to attack Wes, and then Mike, John, and Lucille could pile on? I mean that is what happen..

lucille said:
You seem strangely familiar. Hum.
Welcome, I'm sure you'll fit in somewhere...... :rofl:
Once again Lucille did you know about this?

I also must ask you Mike, you say:

Mike: No – I did not create the Sledgehammer persona.

Now I find this strange, the wording seems to have a hidden meaning. So you did not create these other trolls, does that mean you did not use them? Or even know who did?

I also have a problem with this whole thing, if this was my friend Chuck that made this troll, he would be getting roasted by the same ones taking up for Mike, does this mean that some people here get a free pass?

And I am sorry Chuck, but I had to pick someone.

And another thing Mike, you used this false account to attack Wes for what reason? Is it because you do not like his opinion? I mean, that is the main reason you did this.
 
Bobby,
I asked several people if they were the person who posted, no one admitted to it. I believe it was 'shrillom' that said in a pm that he would in the future share his identity to me, but he never did.
 
critical bill said:
Its ok, what do I know anyway, I'm just a monkey. :eek:

Thats ok Chuck, I will take a monkey like you any day in my camp over a hidden back biter. At least I know with you, you will say what is on your mind to my face with nothing hidden.
 
critical bill said:
You threatened me in a PM as shrillomn, to dig up a two year old thread about me if I didn't cease badgering you. You tried to silence me with a threat. That's not funny. That's not in good fun.

I somehow missed this, Mike you threatened Chuck?

Yea, a real good guy!! :rolleyes:
 
varnyard said:
does this mean that some people here get a free pass?

No. It just means that to many people, since the Shrill alias was created to attack Wes and a few select others (or in Chuck's case actually threaten) and not to attack them personally, then they dont care what the Shrill alias did or to whom.

It is once again a case of applying those ever so heralded ethics that so many preach about selectively.
 
I think "attack" is being thrown around a little too loosely. A disagreement isn't an attack. I don't recall Mike, as Shrillomn, ever calling anyone cutesy names,swearing or threatening. I know there was the PM to Chuck but that was in private. It doesn't make it good. He admitted that it got out of hand.

I agree with Sammy's point that there was a good deal of harm done when members started up against each other as a result of something originated by Shrill.

My vote, good guy that made a mistake.
 
BryonsBoas said:
I can't help but to wonder but why the reference was made to DDOS attack in the first post to begin with if the OP truly doesn't think Mike is a bad guy and was merely stirring the pot.

Because when the DDoS attack was taking place, the people I talked to asked me if there was anyone in particular that I felt would possibly be responsible. Many DDoS attacks are launched by someone disgruntled at a website and have the knowledge and capability to utilize what is called a "kiddie script" to launch a minor DDoS attack against the website.

In my opinion, Mike is a suspect. I am not accusing him of being so, but I also cannot rule it out, either. But I believe the rules of RISK I outlined pretty much explained this reasoning.
 
Stardust said:
Chuck,

Can you post that PM where he threatened you?

You think I had it saved for a special occasion like this? You were actually active in the thread that I confronted him about his PM. Its in the beginning pages of the link I provided a few posts back. He didn't deny sending me the PM and he didn't confirm it either. He never accepted my challenge to post it or else I would. When he wouldn't post it I just pegged him for the coward I knew he was and there really was no sense in pursuing it further.

I don't know....maybe the coward shrillomn has the pm he sent me saved in his outbox and the mods can retrieve it.
 
Back
Top