• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Mods, I'm curious

hhmoore said:
So by referring to Mr Frank, and Mr Clark, Wes is being antagonistic?? :icon_bs:
I hope that I am paying attention the day somebody issues THAT warning...and if I'm not, somebody give me a wakeup call. I would hate to miss the party

Correct,in my opinion he is.
As you can see in the post that he is quoted in a couple of posts up.He uses all lower case letters.Not as you have written it here.
I have noticed this on numerous occasions when he is all fired up.
As for the warning ,why would someone warn a obvious "fishing " tactic.
I for one can understand when i am being baited. :)
 
Stardust said:
Aww come on, lets call it for what it is. Lack of using caps for names and on and on. Wes does what he does, he plays games and can be rude, crude and crass, he clearly likes the drama and being the center of it. He can also be nice, caring and good with snakes.

Would some of that be worth warning points? Naw, IMO that is just who Wes is and he has outted some bad guys being who he is but I am not going to say that he is this guy with angel wings who is simply misunderstood. :rofl:
One of the COOLEST things about people and trusting them, telling them things, sharing confidences, listening to problems and offering solutions, sharing the comaraderee of standing side by side while the bullets fly, digging that foxhole and huddling in it together, is when those confidences leak out, squirt between the seams of friendship and shared hardship, when the darts are thrown or the pungee sticks enearthed, when what is shared is then brought out and smeared all around, hither and yon, reinforcing as it flakes and dries, shrinking in the light of day and exposure unprotected, is that you CAN tell yourself, "I told you so."

I TOLD me so.
 
christopher66 said:
I for one can understand when i am being baited. :)
AHAHAhahahahahHAHAHAHAhahahahahaAHAHAHAhahahahAHAHAhahahAHAhahAHAHAHAHAhahahaHAHaha whoooooo wheeeee thanks for the laugh, and I mean that with all due respect mr. frank, indeed I do, for true for true. chuckle chuckle

I needed that respite from fauna drama and you supplied it MOST excellently.
 
To be clear - I was not insinuating that he was being sincere & respectful. But the idea of warnings for being called Mr (or mr.) is kinda funny.
 
hhmoore said:
To be clear - I was not insinuating that he was being sincere & respectful. But the idea of warnings for being called Mr (or mr.) is kinda funny.


Who brought up warnings in the first place??
Ahh...the power of suggestion. :)
 
Wilomn said:
One of the COOLEST things about people and trusting them, telling them things, sharing confidences, listening to problems and offering solutions, sharing the comaraderee of standing side by side while the bullets fly, digging that foxhole and huddling in it together, is when those confidences leak out, squirt between the seams of friendship and shared hardship, when the darts are thrown or the pungee sticks enearthed, when what is shared is then brought out and smeared all around, hither and yon, reinforcing as it flakes and dries, shrinking in the light of day and exposure unprotected, is that you CAN tell yourself, "I told you so."

I TOLD me so.

Oh please....LMAO :rofl: :rofl:

Well I have always told you that you are a great writer.
 
christopher66 said:
Who brought up warnings in the first place??
Ahh...the power of suggestion. :)
The power of suggestion, or the choice of words?
christopher66 said:
And we can could change the word condensending to antagonism very easily.
I'm guessing that the word that you actually meant was condescending. Antagonism of a moderator would, of course, be a warnable offense. Harald is not stupid, and neither are the rest of us who sift through what you write. If you think that you are so intellectually superior that you "suggested" this to Harald then you are very much sorely mistaken.
 
CurtisF said:
I'm more curious as to whether of not people think this is working.

So, mods, I'm curious. Or, if so inclined, people in general:

Do you think the new system is working? IE - better than it was.
I believe that it is giving Webslave some time away from the kiddy table and allows him to focus on other issues. I am unsure if he gets less whine-o-grams than before, but I can tell you that I have received some lovely comments.

As far as Wes goes....No I am not intimidated at all. I have also issued warnings to him. Wes and I are friends and friends will disagree from time to time.

I also agree with some of the other mods here. If I see a post that warrants points and some have already been issued, I try to look at the topic as a whole, the post and then poster. Obviously profanity will not be tolerated, however, some of the topics lately have been more hostile than the norm, tempers have flared and insults slung.

I as a mod, prefer to present myself as firm but fair, not only as a representative of this sight, but in this industry as a whole.
 
Jim O said:
The power of suggestion, or the choice of words?

If you think that you are so intellectually superior that you "suggested" this to Harald then you are very much sorely mistaken.


No not at all jim-o. :)
I have no reason what so ever to be disrespectfull to Harald.
Its to bad you cant see my humor . :)
 
Laura Fopiano said:
I believe that it is giving Webslave some time away from the kiddy table and allows him to focus on other issues. I am unsure if he gets less whine-o-grams than before, but I can tell you that I have received some lovely comments.

As far as Wes goes....No I am not intimidated at all. I have also issued warnings to him. Wes and I are friends and friends will disagree from time to time.

I also agree with some of the other mods here. If I see a post that warrants points and some have already been issued, I try to look at the topic as a whole, the post and then poster. Obviously profanity will not be tolerated, however, some of the topics lately have been more hostile than the norm, tempers have flared and insults slung.

I as a mod, prefer to present myself as firm but fair, not only as a representative of this sight, but in this industry as a whole.

I couldn't agree more with what you said. There are times when multiple warnings are appropriate and there are times when it just is not.

You are also right, it give Rich some time to do some of the things he needs/wants to get done without always having to check here.
 
Not intimidated, I just don't get to his posts in a timely manner and don't see the point of dinging someone after several others have.
 
christopher66 said:
No not at all jim-o. :)
I have no reason what so ever to be disrespectfull to Harald.
Its to bad you cant see my humor . :)
I'm curious.

Would one who could see your humor also be able to hear the sound of one hand clapping?
 
christopher66 said:
No not at all jim-o. :)
I have no reason what so ever to be disrespectfull to Harald.
Its to bad you cant see my humor . :)

A fine example here.
So one can ask were you being sarcastic with not capping Jim's name? Was it just a mistake? OR do you secretly look up to Wes and are trying to imitate him? :shrug01:

Funny how things work.
 
Stardust said:
A fine example here.
So one can ask were you being sarcastic with not capping Jim's name? Was it just a mistake? OR do you secretly look up to Wes and are trying to imitate him? :shrug01:

Funny how things work.


The irony of it all.
 
Christopher, I know exactly whats going on here, just wanted to try and lighten things up a bit and change the mood of the past few days. :thumbsup:
christopher66 said:
Come on Ed, i find it hard to think that you think its being done out of "total respect ",IMHO its done in a condensending manor....just like i believe this quote of yours is done in the same manner.
And we can could change the word condensending to antagonism very easily. :rolleyes:
 
Ed Clark said:
Christopher, I know exactly whats going on here, just wanted to try and lighten things up a bit and change the mood of the past few days. :thumbsup:


Now THATS a tough job to do.
Perseverance Ed , perseverance . :thumbsup:
 
Ed Clark said:
Christopher, I know exactly whats going on here, just wanted to try and lighten things up a bit and change the mood of the past few days. :thumbsup:
With all due respect mr. clark, some of us have had quite a few laughs in the last couple of days what with you ignoring questions and lying for answers and editing posts and just the general buffoonery that has been so prevalent.
 
Wes, theres nothing there. :thumbsup: Seamus did not like the way I worded that ad... :shrug01: thats all.
Wilomn said:
With all due respect mr. clark, some of us have had quite a few laughs in the last couple of days what with you ignoring questions and lying for answers and editing posts and just the general buffoonery that has been so prevalent.
 
Ed Clark said:
Wes, theres nothing there. :thumbsup: Seamus did not like the way I worded that ad... :shrug01: thats all.
You just keep telling yourself that mr. clark. It won't change the fact that it's a lie but it does seem to make you feel better about having told a lie.

It's pretty cool to have erased the evidence, isn't it? Of course THAT is something that has gotten more than one mod fired in the past, the removal of ones words when they point to a less than good facet of one's being.
 
I believe Seamus saved the original ad and posted it, not sure about that. Dennis H. verified the original ad in the BOI thread. :shrug01:
Wilomn said:
You just keep telling yourself that mr. clark. It won't change the fact that it's a lie but it does seem to make you feel better about having told a lie.

It's pretty cool to have erased the evidence, isn't it? Of course THAT is something that has gotten more than one mod fired in the past, the removal of ones words when they point to a less than good facet of one's being.
 
Back
Top