• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

More Mini-Dictators

Seamus Haley

Big Game Hunter
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Messages
2,433
Reaction score
81
Points
0
Location
South Boston
On Bob Clark's forum this time...

Sooo... a few days ago (probably no more than a week), a buddy of mine sends me a link to the Bob Clark Forums as there's a thread about venomoids running and it looked to be shaping up in an interesting manner. Always up for the topic, I wander over and check it out and find it basically to be what I thought it would be. A load of garbage.

I've never liked the Clark forums, registered there a few times (don't know if they delete inactive registrations or if server moves at them or what) on and off over the years when there was a topic of particular interest at the time but never stuck around afterwards and became an active member. The entire attitude rubs me the wrong way and the method of moderation and the highly selective enforcement by SOME of the moderators smacks of the sort of thing I never tolerated with KS or on AOL. It's essentially an ego driven circle-jerk, with the same questionable characters patting one another on the back over every post and with post count totals being mistaken for education or credibility or general knowledge. Heck, even the post count related titles support this sort of cloistered mentality.

At any rate... a few of the biggest egomaniacs over there were in a heated argument over the subject with such noteable and respected hot keepers/educators as Scott Bice, B.W. Smith, Tanith Tyrr and Gregg M (sorry if I misspelled anyone's name). The moderators and their faithful lap dogs were extremely offensive and disrespectful to the highly credible individuals they were arguing with and the thread was eventually locked down (And I seem unable to locate it... whole thing deleted?).

Skip forward a short period of time...

There was a thread running concerning the legal troubles that Black Knight has been having and the abrupt inability to buy direct from the manufacturer, as it progressed the subject shifted very slightly to alternative mite treatment options. Tanith mentioned a method which she has used for years, one of the moderators contradicted it's effectiveness and safety and she returned with a comment stating that it had been used in a reliable manner by zooligical institutions. One of the lap dogs then essentially told her that she knew nothing when it came to the education and experience of the moderator, casually dismissing her position and the moderator claimed she was quoting her responses off a credible website, then provided said website.

The website he provided happened to be Tanith's.

I, as well as a few others who had been treated in a less than respectful manner (we didn't have five thousand posts, who were we to argue? clearly post counts indicate general knowledge) found this to be hilarious. I added the quote by the lapdog as a link to my signature on the site, it was identical to the one at the end of my signature here and on a few other forums where I thought people might enjoy it. When someone sticks their foot in their mouth that badly, it's amusing.

I was sent an email by Jay Owens asking me to change my signature, I returned an email declining to do so, as I saw nothing whatsoever wrong with it. I got no further response but my signature remained unchanged.

The moderator who had made himself look like a fool then EDITED my post, removing that line from the signature, he threatened to ban me if I posted it again... Guess he didn't like being seen as what he is. I posted again of course, as I feel I was in the "right" in my position of retaining it... it didn't violate any of the rules of the site, it wasn't vulgar or offensive or gratuitously advertising anything.

Needless to say, my posts were deleted, I got an error message telling me I had an invalid username or password when I tried to reply to another thread and it seems *that* entire thread has dissapeared as well. Luckily, as a veteran of the kingsnake censorship wars and similar events on AOL's forums, I had the sense to save a copy in advance, so that the blunder can be immortalized for all time via another forum/web host.

At any rate... This is identical to the garbage that happened on Kingsnake and borders on the paranoid egomania displayed by Mario Stinso. I figure this serves as fair warning to anyone who might be inclined to register and post over there that you're going behind the Iron Curtain of forum dictatorship and you mustn't offend the wretched little minds who base their self esteem on their status in a web forum.

Below is the text of the first page of the thread wherein Lyncheyez makes himself look like a nit-wit. Take careful note of how, when his apparant mistake is pointed out, he doesn't apologize, he tries to attack her again. The guy just doesn't learn... and apparantly doesn't have to since he's a moderator. Anything which identifies his lack of common sense can be deleted for his protection.

Warning- LONG

BoasnKC
Forum Moderator


USA
1682 Posts Posted - 03/17/2004 : 5:32:13 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I called to place another order today for Black Knight, and to my suprise the company representative that I spoke to informed me that they were no longer selling it due to a decision in a recent lawsuit. He explained that it consisted of another company who makes a similar product filing a class action lawsuit againt the company that produces the Black Knight product. They were being sued becasue they were grandfathered in on a EPA law that required aerosol companies to lower the amount of CFCs in their products. The company sued them because they didn't feel that it was right for the Black Knight manufacturer to not have to comply with the EPA's law. Unfortunalty the judge on the case agreed and has suspended the manufacturering of the product until further notice. According to the manufactuer rep they are appealing and hope to be selling their product again soon. He gave an estimate that was as soon as 3 months and as long as 18 months. He also mentioned that the real unfortunate thing was they have a warehouse full of Black Knight.

He also mentioned that they have already developed a new, lower CFC Black Knight, and that it takes the EPA up to a year in some cases to approve new products.

Unfortunatly Provent-a-mite is the next best thing and it is double the cost. Black Knight was available in 12oz cans and was around $20 per can, while Provent-a-mite only comes in 6oz cans and is the same price if not a little more.


"I'll make him an offer he can't refuse" -Don Corleone

Ian
Reptile Expert


Tonga
2133 Posts Posted - 03/17/2004 : 7:42:27 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That sucks. I hope that they are able to sell it again soon.
Any idea on who sued?

IAN

www.slicesoflight.com
"I'm not one to criticize or pass judgment, but if there is a bigger group of morons than the folks at PETA, I will eat my hat"-Eric D. Snider


OBZ
Reptile Expert


USA
1752 Posts Posted - 03/17/2004 : 8:15:04 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That sucks. I hope that they are able to sell it again soon.
Any idea on who sued?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


based on the story, if i had to guess id say PAM.



recycle your pets

Dr Owens
Herp Fan Forum Administrator


USA
11045 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 02:56:54 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

based on the story, if i had to guess id say PAM.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And you guessed right.

I've been recently looking into products that are chemically identical to PAM...I'll be posting some results soon. Personally, I can't justify paying a 300% (or more) markup for a name brand...especially when that name brand uses underhanded tactics to try to eliminate it's competition.




MsTT
Neonate


USA
28 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 03:06:29 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None of the name brands are necessary. Many of the lice sprays sold over the counter at Wal Mart have from 0.25% to 0.5% permethrin with no other active ingredients, and are perfectly suitable for use on snake cages and bedding. We use Nix and Rid-Lice.

As with any drug, caution must be taken - do not spray in or around waterbowls, do not spray directly on a snake from closer than several feet, do not spray a snake's head, do not spray on young snakes at all but treat only the bedding, and allow the bedding to dry before re-introducing the snake.

In particular be careful using this product with snakes who habitually drink from water sprayed on glass or sprayed on their bodies. I would treat those animals by lightly spraying a pillowcase, allowing it to dry and enclosing the animal in the treated pillowcase overnight.


Ian
Reptile Expert


Tonga
2133 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 03:28:14 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
based on the story, if i had to guess id say PAM.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And you guessed right.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thats what I thought, but I didnt want to say anything and cause a stir.
Is there anyway to get it out of their warehouse? There has to be a way around this.
And I guess I wont be doing business with the makers of PAM.

IAN

www.slicesoflight.com
"I'm not one to criticize or pass judgment, but if there is a bigger group of morons than the folks at PETA, I will eat my hat"-Eric D. Snider


Zisteau
Reptile Expert


USA
1793 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 03:53:35 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there anyway to get it out of their warehouse?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A crowbar might work.



Travis Aven
Reptile Expert


USA
2655 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 06:55:54 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None of the name brands are necessary. Many of the lice sprays sold over the counter at Wal Mart have from 0.25% to 0.5% permethrin with no other active ingredients, and are perfectly suitable for use on snake cages and bedding. We use Nix and Rid-Lice.

As with any drug, caution must be taken - do not spray in or around waterbowls, do not spray directly on a snake from closer than several feet, do not spray a snake's head, do not spray on young snakes at all but treat only the bedding, and allow the bedding to dry before re-introducing the snake.

In particular be careful using this product with snakes who habitually drink from water sprayed on glass or sprayed on their bodies. I would treat those animals by lightly spraying a pillowcase, allowing it to dry and enclosing the animal in the treated pillowcase overnight.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Considering the relatively low volume of Pam buyers, I suspect they are just relabeling something like Nix or Rid. Some of those lice sprays have a different chemical; but I think they are probably just as safe and effective. The rules for using with people are the same. However, I will use only the Permthrin product as long as it is available,


Travis


Lyncheyez
Forum Moderator


USA
5266 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 09:04:49 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None of the name brands are necessary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Just so there's no confusion here, Nix and Rid are not chemically identical as PAM or Black Knight. While they both use synthetic Pyrethrum, their individual formulations vary and so does their safe use.

Also don't get mislead by the “other ingredients” used in the formulation of these product. Many use organic solvents, which can be labeled as "inert". But they themselves can be toxic and their presence can affect chemical absorption and significantly increase toxicity.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of those lice sprays have a different chemical; but I think they are probably just as safe and effective.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Actually, some dog/cat/people sprays can have a devastating affect on your snake’s nervous system and can’t be lumped together as “safe”. I’ve seen it more than once in my time experimenting with alternatives to Vapona (the treatment of choice for many years).

-Randy


Edited by - Lyncheyez on 03/18/2004 12:47:40 PM

OBZ
Reptile Expert


USA
1752 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 12:45:02 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
well, i still havea case of BK in my closet,... and a collection that is mite free... i should be set for life (knock on wood)

edit- oh also, i think PE still has a surplus of BK... get it while the getting is good folks.



recycle your pets

Edited by - obz on 03/18/2004 12:45:33 PM

MsTT
Neonate


USA
28 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 6:24:14 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reptile World Serpentarium has been using Nix for about thirty years with no side effects, so I would have to say that one is safe. I have used both Nix and Rid-Lice with good results, with the caution caveats I have already mentioned.

The active ingredient in these products is permethrin. Black Knight I believe is phenothrin? Both are quite low toxicity in snakes, but that is a very good point about other ingredients in the spray causing potential problems.


Ian
Reptile Expert


Tonga
2133 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 6:54:46 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reptile World Serpentarium has been using Nix for about thirty years with no side effects, so I would have to say that one is safe. I have used both Nix and Rid-Lice with good results, with the caution caveats I have already mentioned.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Trust me, Randy knows what he is talking about.

IAN

www.slicesoflight.com
"I'm not one to criticize or pass judgment, but if there is a bigger group of morons than the folks at PETA, I will eat my hat"-Eric D. Snider


Lyncheyez
Forum Moderator


USA
5266 Posts Posted - 03/18/2004 : 10:57:42 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reptile World Serpentarium has been using Nix for about thirty years with no side effects, so I would have to say that one is safe.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Didn't say it wasn't...only that you can't be overly general when talking about the differt products on the market and their formulations.

I've posted this link before...but have a look anyway everyone:

http://www.kingsnake.com/snakegetters/demo/vet/equip1.html

...it contains essentially the same accounts of what you've written here. In fact everything you've said here (including Reptile World as an example) can be found on that webpage - almost verbatim.

-Randy


NeoChat

Edited by - Lyncheyez on 03/18/2004 11:03:45 PM

MsTT
Neonate


USA
28 Posts Posted - 03/19/2004 : 01:23:52 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...it contains essentially the same accounts of what you've written here. In fact everything you've said here (including Reptile World as an example) can be found on that webpage - almost verbatim.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That is probably because I wrote it. That's my web page. lol


Lyncheyez
Forum Moderator


USA
5266 Posts Posted - 03/19/2004 : 07:13:58 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is probably because I wrote it. That's my web page. lol

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


So why not direct people to your webpage instead of piece mailing it here?


Here is the email Jay sent me earlier. After my response, no immediate action was taken to edit my signature or ban me, so I figured maybe he had seen that trying to force me to edit the link wasn't really even handed or "fair" but I guess it was simply delayed...

Hello M_surinamensis

You received the following message from : Dr Owens ([email protected])

At: http://www.bobclark.com/bcforums/

Seamus,
I will not allow you to join this site and begin mocking it's moderators. Please voluntarily remove your signature line so that I won't have to do it for you.

Dr Owens

I'd also like to point out that the moderator mocked himself. I didn't show up at his home and force him to act like a dink, he chose to do it on his own. Maybe because he felt threatened by a group of obviously more experienced herpers... I dunno.

Here's my response...

You know Jay... Go ahead. Hell, ban me... I can add that to my "I was banned from Kingsnake.com" T-shirt, there's plenty of room on the back. Randy makes an ass out of himself on a regular basis, accusing Tanith of plagarizing from herself after trying to argue with her based on her own information is simply hilarious and I think others will enjoy it as I did.

He mocked himself... I didn't force him to say what he did, it was his own choice.

-Seamus

As that was from my sent mail folder, I don't have the header attached but I'd be happy to forward it to anyone if Jay disagrees with the contents I have posted. I did happily invite my banning and really don't regret it. I won't be crying myself to sleep over my inability to post on a forum that's of questionable character to start. I simply figured that, if they were going to be trying to censor something as foolish as a signature with a quote, correctly attributed and a link to a thread on their own boards, that it was the likely next step anyway.

Unfortunately I didn't manage to save the response Randy posted inside MY post (he edited his response into it) on the second page and, as I can't remember it exactly I won't even try to give specifics. It was basically a threat though... edit his embarassing episode out of my signature or be banned. Perhaps someone else who saw the thread between the time he posted and the time it dissapeared will have something a bit more specific.

At any rate... It's something to be cautious of. Be sure to tip-toe on the Clark forums or you might set off the basket case inner circle.

Sooo... I'm off to load this saved page and correct all those signature links I've posted.
 
Hmmm... might not have to...

The link in my signature still works. Sorta. It loads an extremely heavilt edited version of the thread... but the thread no longer appears under the list in the broader forum. Looks like maybe the link to the thread was removed but the thread itself wasn't deleted.

Lyncheyez and Ian's amusing posts can still be seen via the linkas of the time I write this message.
 
That's just too funny that the mod tried to correct Tanyth by citing her OWN SITE!!! Crazy stuff happens on these forums...

But I find it very distressing that any forum (I don't care WHO runs it) would take the side of an obviously wrong moderator over someone who was simply quoting the error. Did they not understand that if the mod had been big enough to admit his error that you would not have felt the need to have that episode in your signature line?

Too bad...
 
Seamus,

Being a long time fan of your posts, when I see your invariably mindless banter, I always find myself wondering if you actually own any reptiles or if you really know anything about them. It seems to me that your real passion in life is arguing and bickering, not reptiles.

As for the Bob Clark forums, you and I both know that you only came over to there to stir up trouble and voice your unwanted (and deservingly unrespected) opinions. Your signature served the very same purpose as you being there in the first place...to stir up trouble. Nothing less, nothing more. Any mature, respectable adult can see that. On top of being a habitual trouble maker (no surprise), you didn't have any useful knowledge to contribute (no big surprise there either) and as a result, you were banned. I'm not sure why it's so hard for you to grasp, but I'll lay it out for you in 3rd grade English. We don't like you and we didn't want you there, period. Your signature just made it all the easier.

If it makes you feel better about being such a social outcast, go ahead and have that t-shirt made. There should be at least another three or four people just like you, who think you're cool for wearing it. As for the rest of us, the shirt will just serve as a testament of what an argumentative, socially inept jerkoff you really are.

To those of you who know me, I sincerely apologize that you had to see this. I usually try to maintain a positive image, but Since Seamus went out of his way to attack a forum that I'm a long time member (and moderator) of, along with some of my personal friends (guys I actually hang out with), I felt it necessary to say something.

And yes, I know...here comes my first warning. :D


By the way, Seamus, I know you're going to reply, but don't expect me to answer. I have a nice collection of reptiles to maintain and I've already put more of my valuable time into this than you're worth.
 
...another useless thread via Seamus

But I find it very distressing that any forum (I don't care WHO runs it) would take the side of an obviously wrong moderator

Where was I wrong Darin? I never corrected MsTT, I merely pointed out that the information that was being passed was word for word verbatim from a site I had seen previously. I think there was much disagreement about the content of the information in that thread, simply a discussion about the topic. As I’m a professionally employed scientist, I believe that I may have something to contribute to an organic chemistry oriented discussion. As Seamus is known far and wide as a troublemaker, his reason for joining and commenting inanely on that topic seem suspect. I’m of the belief that reasonable objective people can discern the truth here.

Also here's what the originator MsTT (Tanyth) thanks of Seamus's contribution to that thread:

"It seems a shame that people can spend time posting helpful information and have their posts deleted because of what other people did in that thread."

…I couldn’t agree more.

My job is to ensure proper information gets passed out in a manner that doesn't create confusion, is honestly derived, and presented reasonably. With a warning level of 20 here at Fauna, my guess is that Seamus's job is to make people that have my job difficult - he failed.

That’s the full and end of my contribution here (yet another useless thread).

-Randy "Lyncheyez" May
 
One of the lap dogs then essentially told her that she knew nothing when it came to the education and experience of the moderator, casually dismissing her position and the moderator claimed she was quoting her responses off a credible website, then provided said website.
Since you are refering to me, point out where I said that. I merely said that Randy knows what he is talking about when it comes to chemical compositions. But seeing as he is a scientist, he must not know what he is talking about.
Heck, even the post count related titles support this sort of cloistered mentality.
Really, because no one on the BC forum cares what the title is.
a few of the biggest egomaniacs over there were in a heated argument over the subject with such noteable and respected hot keepers/educators as Scott Bice, B.W. Smith, Tanith Tyrr and Gregg M (sorry if I misspelled anyone's name).
Yeah....we are egomaniacs because we ask for proof of the outrageous claims made by Gregg and Brian.
When someone sticks their foot in their mouth that badly, it's amusing.
I'd say you are up to your knee about now. How was I sticking my foot in my mouth by saying Randy knows what he is talking about? How was Randy sticking his foot in his mouth by pointing out the information was already posted on the internet? He didn't know it was MsTT's page, and just said that she could have linked. If MsTT wasn't upset by it, why are you?
Judging by the fact you have 20 warnings, I would say you just like to cause as much trouble as you possibly can. Kind of like the 13 year old kids in junior high.

IAN
 
Randy,

If I misread or misunderstood what Seamus posted there in the actual text (it is jumbled about a bit), I apologize for saying you had been wrong. It just appears/appeared to me that you were correcting Tanith wherein she disagreed with you, and you cited a website that she happened to have written.

Is that not what happened? If not, please set me straight!
 
Whoa. I would really rather not be cast in the role of "MsTT vs the evil Bob Clark Forum". It isn't quite as clear cut as that.

Yes, it is always amusing when people quote your own web site at you. However I am given to understand that Dr. Owens removed the thread temporarily because it was becoming less of a source of good information and more of a platform for personal attacks. Regardless of who is right and who is wrong, that doesn't contribute anything helpful to an otherwise informative thread.

On the venomoid thread, there were bad manners, foul language, spurious arguments and personal attacks being displayed on BOTH sides. When a thread gets to that level of ugliness, there is not a lot the admins can do except to lock it down. Whose fault is that? Pretty much everybody's. It's annoying, because I practically wrote a book on that thread about my training methods that focus on the nonvenomous analogues, and I have no other copies of those posts. But it is also understandable. The behavior on that thread was very, very bad all around. Very few people were able to remain polite and professional on the topic. Most were resorting to bad language and personal attacks. It is no surprise that the thread was removed.

I am sorry to say that one of the moderators was in this category as well. It is very difficult for most people to remain rational and calm when discussing the topic of venomoids, and resorting to name calling and personal attacks seems to be the general order of most of these debates. I wouldn't blame any admins for banning the topic entirely as it is always likely to make a good deal of extra work for them.

When a venomoid thread disappears, don't be so quick to blame the administration. Look at the level of behavior on the thread itself and put the blame where it belongs - on the specific people who turned the thread into a personal war zone with name calling and bad language. If we can hold our discussions in a calm and courteous manner without personal attacks, there is no reason to remove them. But if we cannot, we should reasonably expect the discussion to be removed or locked.
 
Re: ...another useless thread via Seamus

NeoScales said:
Also here's what the originator MsTT (Tanyth) thanks of Seamus's contribution to that thread:

"It seems a shame that people can spend time posting helpful information and have their posts deleted because of what other people did in that thread."

…I couldn’t agree more.


Um. Well. That's good, but you deleted the post of mine that you are quoting here.

I was trying to politely explain why I thought it was discourteous and self promoting to go around constantly waving one's own website banner. I don't do that, so it is no surprise that most people do not know that Snake Getters is my site. They aren't necessarily supposed to. It's not a big secret, but neither does it need to be advertised as a personal ego platform. That post was also deleted.

I don't really like being in the middle of this argument, and I've been trying to calm people down on both sides and discourage further arguments that are based on personalities rather than the issues. Unfortunately that has been a bit difficult to do since my posts are being deleted on that forum.
 
I just wanted to add that I understand deleting posts that violate TOS or that are posted to cause more arguments and flames. My concern is that posts are being deleted that are either helpful information or an attempt to calm people down and clarify the rules of forum courtesy. The post of mine that you deleted (and then quoted here) would be an example of the latter.
 
Against my better judgement....

...I'll clarify further.

Is that not what happened? If not, please set me straight!


A reasonable request, that I'll answer:

There's no technical disagreement between what Tanith wrote and what I contributed to I the thread. I made comments where I thought appropriate, technical issues I felt were important to add – all perfectly civil. However after reading a few of the last comments made, it triggered a memory of a website I had seen. I took a look at the website, saw that many comments were essentially verbatim from the page. Since the page isn’t credited to anyone, I made mention of the similarity and left it open to comment. Guess what? It’s MsTT’s site, clarification made. As to why such thing concern me, I’ve posted that and here’s that text:

"I believe that for continuity sake, you should at least mention it when you quote directly from it. Here's why - my job is ensure people get quality advice from quality people. If someone was to cut and paste excerpts from your site (happens all the time), it would make them appear to have knowledge they do not have. That creates a false sense of reliability concerning that person's level of experience and could easily lead to poor information being passed on and believed.

This sort of QC is done all the time in academics and by your own admission, the site isn’t credited to you. No one accused you of anything, I merely gave you a chance to explain the similarities in your comments with the site. If that offends you, then consider taking my advice and linking or mentioning the site next time you have this conversation."

...as for Seamus, I've spoken to him. His involvement was nothing more than trolling, simple attempts to malign me. He’s expanding that activity here and is completely devoid of any intellectual honesty.

-Randy
 
...doh!

Um. Well. That's good, but you deleted the post of mine that you are quoting here.

No I didn't...

The troll posts, the ones that are simply off topic and inappropriate were deleted. But that thread was simply moved until things cooled down. Unfortunate Seamus has opted to generate multiple threads on multiple forums attempting to malign me and the forum in general.

My concern is that posts are being deleted that are either helpful information or an attempt to calm people down

Again, it's still there but it's also a target for people like Seamus to return and troll. So if it's not there for people to use, blame him, not me. If he hadn't pushed things, it would have been placed back for public view or removed at all.

-Randy
 
As far as I am concerned, those are rational explanations of a reasonably sound moderation policy. I do not take any offense at them and I hope other people will not do so on my behalf.

I am trying to calm things down, and it's a bit unnerving when my attempts to do so are deleted, but I understand how these posts can become platforms for more personal attacks and flaming back and forth on both sides. That doesn't contribute anything positive to the community and it makes sense to nip it in the bud.

I did take offense at being called PETA-esque because I consider the practice of venomoiding to be irresponsible, unethical and physically unreliable for many reasons which I consider to be good and well researched. I would rather debate the issues from a veterinary standpoint than resort to slinging around exaggerated labels.
 
I've been a member on the Bob Clark forums for a short time now and quite enjoy myself there. The only people who seem to have a hard time are the people who ask really dumb questions; either from lack of intelligence or purposely trying to start trouble. I don't see any form of dictatorship or ganging up on anyone who hasn't clearly deserved it. But what would I know...I'm rational and intelligent.

Luckily, as a veteran of the kingsnake censorship wars and similar events on AOL's forums, I had the sense to save a copy in advance, so that the blunder can be immortalized for all time via another forum/web host.
Is there such a thing as a professional troll? Please give us more tips of the trade.

I'm sure me posting here only encourages you, as attention is obviously the bottom line in this nonsense, but I'm absolutely baffled that an adult (assuming you are one) has the time and the immaturity level to do such things. As Ian pointed out, someone with 20 points worth of warnings is hardly an unbiased opinion on the events that occurred. As Tannith seemed to be trying to say, there seemed to be no ruffled feathers aside from you starting trouble. And now you've been banned and are attempting to continue the trouble elsewhere. Go clean some cages or do something mildly productive.
 
MsTT
I NEVER called YOU Peta-esque.
Gregg and BWSmith, yes, I called them Peta-esque. The tactics they used were Peta-esque.
I am sorry if you took that as an attack against you.

I did take offense at being called PETA-esque because I consider the practice of venomoiding to be irresponsible, unethical and physically unreliable for many reasons which I consider to be good and well researched. I would rather debate the issues from a veterinary standpoint than resort to slinging around exaggerated labels.
Like I posted many times, and have even emailed people for, is facts. I understand your concerns against the surgery, I have a few problems with it myself. I just want to see some facts about the surgery. But this isnt the place for this discussion (or is it?)

If I called everyone Peta-esque who was just oposed to venomoids, I would be calling many of my friends that as well.

IAN
 
I did take offense at being called PETA-esque because I consider the practice of venomoiding to be irresponsible, unethical and physically unreliable for many reasons which I consider to be good and well researched. I would rather debate the issues from a veterinary standpoint than resort to slinging around exaggerated labels.

Just to be clear - those statements were mode by other people, it's their opinion they expressed and not the way I debate a topic and I agree with your assessment.

Also I understand the dislike of venomoid surgery, however there are two sides of the issue. You and I share a similar opinion on this practice, just not completely. There has to be room for debate on most (in not all) issues, some topics create more heat than others - venomoids is one of them. The entire back half of that thread was little more than a back-and-forth of personal nonsense. The forum half had lots of good information, and a lot of poor pseudo-scientific information used to justify poorly articulated positions (again, not you).

Also - no one should be using my name in defense of me or their own position. My name should only appear in my threads...please.

-Randy
 
NeoScales said:
Also - no one should be using my name in defense of me or their own position. My name should only appear in my threads...please.

I can agree heartily with that.

There were bad manners and bad science on both sides of the debate. I don't like to see bad science and I will refute it even if it supposedly supports the anti-venomoid argument. No matter how outraged you are at the practice of venomoiding, it does not do that side of the argument any favors if you present reasons to oppose it that are not well researched. Assuming a snake survives the procedure, there currently do not appear to be any long term health consequences from the lack of envenomating prey. Stating that there are is bad science. The jury is still out on some of the subtler effects on macro- and micronutrient profile, but the evidence is pretty good that venomous snakes in captivity do just fine eating F/T mice with no envenomation. The fully intact ones do it too.

Mortality rate for this operation when performed by a competent reptile medicine specialist in a veterinary hospital on a healthy adult captive born snake is likely to be close to 0%. Mortality rate when performed by an amateur with inadequate drugs and nonsterile Home Depot/craft store tools on skinny, sick, debilitated B grade fresh imports may approach 100%. There is no single set of numbers that can be claimed for this operation by either side.

As for pro venomoiders, the large and glaring fact that they generally seem to miss is the procedure itself. I would be just fine if someone cut off both my ears, but the fact that I would recover and lead a normal life is not a good justification for anyone to come over here with a pair of scissors.

The pro venomoiders also seem to miss this one. There are very major differences between sedation, chemical immobility/restraint, anesthesia and pain management protocol. Those are four completely different issues in veterinary medicine and a competent reptile veterinarian will be addressing (or at least thoroughly understanding) the separate applications in a surgical procedure.

Not all veterinarians are competent with reptiles, nor do they necessarily keep up with current research into issues like pain management protocol in reptile medicine. Certainly the non veterinarians performing these "surgeries" in an amateur manner do not, so they are likely to use chemical restraint/immobility without true anesthesia or pain management to perform their procedures. This is unfortunately true of some veterinarians as well, and pain management protocol for reptiles is currently a very hot topic in the veterinary community because so many practicioners are not adequately addressing it.

So a lot of things are being missed or misinterpreted on both sides of the debate. It is too bad that it has to dengenerate into bad science and bad manners almost every time it is discussed.
 
Here's the deal from my view.

The venomoid thread got out of hand very quickly, at which point I recused myself from posting further. Discretion it the better part of Valor after all. I was referenced in the thread, but there was another "Tom" in the fray so I let it be. There are far too many "huge ego activists" in our hobby to ensure longevity of the cause we all support... ...KEEPING SNAKES!!

These self-centered know-it-alls get far too bent out of shape at the slightest disagreement and that is disheartening to say the least. I have had EXTENSIVE experience in the matter, but am hesitant to jump into the fray due to my short temper. Again, discretion.

MsTT will recall that we had a slight disagreement on the BC forum that ended in me thanking them for the information. THAT'S the true spirit of the BCF! It works if you have any intellect at all. If you present your information in an intelligent matter you are commended. If you troll, we jump on you like a pack of dogs. I think that is one of the most attractive attributes of the BCF.

The activists have thinly-veiled ulterior motives that will be called out should any further disturbance arise. Stop now and save face before some of us reveal your true mission. You have been civilly warned.

Tom Hawke
 
Hawkeman said:
MsTT will recall that we had a slight disagreement on the BC forum that ended in me thanking them for the information. THAT'S the true spirit of the BCF! It works if you have any intellect at all. If you present your information in an intelligent matter you are commended. If you troll, we jump on you like a pack of dogs. I think that is one of the most attractive attributes of the BCF.

I half agree. I do appreciate the style of discussion where it's okay to miss a point and to thank someone else for interjecting it for you. I was *not* arguing with Ray when he kindly pointed out that I had not been clear enough in mentioning that not all of the over the counter lice sprays were safe for snakes because some have additional ingredients that may be toxic. I was glad that he picked up on something I missed because it's important information. Other people decided that the exchange was a hostile one, but it really wasn't.

On the other hand, I presented what I feel is good and well researched veterinary information about the current state of the venomoid industry, and I was cursed out in foul language and called names for it. So you'll forgive me if my initial impression is less than 100% positive.
 
...as for Seamus, I've spoken to him.

This is an out and out lie... Randy has never ONCE spoken to me.

Anyone who knows me will verify that I'm not a troll... Not even close. I've simply encountered out of control moderators a time or two in the past. "Moderation" by the very defenition of the word is counter to "using a site as a personal soapbox"

Simple fact of the matter is that Randy displayed a piss-poor attitude towards a number of "new" posters on the venomoid thread and his subsequent posts in the Black Knight thread seemed to be motivated by a personal need to "one up" the new group. My guess was and continues to be that he felt threatened in some manner, as if his position as an unquestionable authority on all things herpetological was being challenged. This is simply a tentative conclusion I have formed based off the way his posts read and the attitude he comes across with. Nor am I alone in forming this impression.

I ask again... If the quote combined with the post weren't showing an embarassing situation, why was there a problem with them being in my signature line?

Regardless of the wording involved or any backpeddling at this point and trying to duck through loopholes and hiding behind semantics... Randy (In his self important omniscience) accused Tanith of plagarizing from her own website. That's just plain funny.
 
Back
Top