Jim O
Careful with that axe...
Mike, remember, he lives in BUFFALO!!!!!!!TopShelfExotics said:Indeed!
One glass of water and I'm golden. Literally.
I can even manage to make room for my middle name...![]()

Mike, remember, he lives in BUFFALO!!!!!!!TopShelfExotics said:Indeed!
One glass of water and I'm golden. Literally.
I can even manage to make room for my middle name...![]()

Jim O said:Yes Brian. Whining. And a "left handed" "no harm no foul". It's the best I will get from you, better than most so I'll take it.
Now, care to comment on your own inconsistencies that Dennis pointed out? Seems you are about as guilty of blowing with the prevailing wind as anyone. To refresh your memory:There is more. I'm sure that you know where to find it.
BTW it's fair to change your mind about things. But hold yourself to the same high standards if you desire credibility.
TopShelfExotics said:I can write my name in the snow with pee.

Jim O said:Mike, remember, he lives in BUFFALO!!!!!!!![]()

PaulSage said:Yours? Or someone else's?![]()
OK Brian. But explain why that is OK. I personally do not think so. Sadly, those people can be doing almost as much harm as if not more than someone handling voids in public. The reasons are that first, someone might photograph them and post it in order to embarrass them (been known to happen) and more importantly they might get bitten and receive a significant envenomation resulting in all kinds of public health attention and perhaps newspaper articles. I can see the opening line -- MAN BIT BY DEADLY PET COBRA or worse -- MAN DIES FROM BITE OF PET COBRA. No one is even going to know that it was his own fault. They're only going to worry that the snake could have gotten loose and bitten them. That's all some nitwit politician needs to help spearhead laws that restrict all of us that feel we are "responsible" from keeping animals that we can safely keep. And I don't mean only hots as you probably understand. All you need to do is look at the proposed legislation in North Carolina to know that this stuff is coming and can affect us all. For those unaware, they want to restrict ownership of ANY snake with the POTENTIAL to get greater than 8 feet. So that would include all common Boas, as they have that potential, scrub pythons, most carpet pythons, even Black-headed pythons as some are (rarely) known to get past 8 feet. So anyone who free hands their hots is risking this for the rest of us. And that is where their "right to privacy" ends in my opinion. And you should speak up against them as I have here, and you should stop the practice yourself.bcfos said:They do it in the privacy of their own hom Jim not out in public. So know some facts before making assumptions. If they did so in public the soapbox would be out in a second flat but as they don't it isn't public knowledge nor a danger to anyone but themselves. Clear enough or do you want names addresses social security numbers and credit histories of the people referenced in that post along with a note from their mother? I don't agree with it but they are free to do as they wish in the privacy of their own homes.
Now care to try again and end up with pure facts? I welcome it and will keep it on a civil level if you do.![]()
Jim O said:OK Brian. But explain why that is OK. I personally do not think so. Sadly, those people can be doing almost as much harm as if not more than someone handling voids in public. The reasons are that first, someone might photograph them and post it in order to embarrass them (been known to happen) and more importantly they might get bitten and receive a significant envenomation resulting in all kinds of public health attention and perhaps newspaper articles. I can see the opening line -- MAN BIT BY DEADLY PET COBRA or worse -- MAN DIES FROM BITE OF PET COBRA. No one is even going to know that it was his own fault. They're only going to worry that the snake could have gotten loose and bitten them. That's all some nitwit politician needs to help spearhead laws that restrict all of us that feel we are "responsible" from keeping animals that we can safely keep. And I don't mean only hots as you probably understand. All you need to do is look at the proposed legislation in North Carolina to know that this stuff is coming and can affect us all. For those unaware, they want to restrict ownership of ANY snake with the POTENTIAL to get greater than 8 feet. So that would include all common Boas, as they have that potential, scrub pythons, most carpet pythons, even Black-headed pythons as some are (rarely) known to get past 8 feet. So anyone who free hands their hots is risking this for the rest of us. And that is where their "right to privacy" ends in my opinion. And you should speak up against them as I have here, and you should stop the practice yourself.
Jim O said:I gave up keeping hots due to demands of career and then having young children in my house. The only hot reptile that I keep currently is a Gila Monster, but I would like the opportunity in the future, and I'll be just as damned not to speak up about it if it's some asswipe free handing in the privacy of his home or in public.
Many agreed with Karen's "You condone it by not condemning it." Why no outrage Brian? I'm not trying to pimp you but don't you think you, as a hot keeper, should be held to the same "low" standards as this "bottom dweller"?bcfos said:They do it in the privacy of their own hom Jim not out in public...If they did so in public the soapbox would be out in a second flat
Then why all the NERD bashing?bcfos said:Jim a lot of good it does telling them how wrong they are.
NERD said:Yes, there are venomoids here. Are we going out & actively purchasing them & spending money on folks to make them? No. Some were bought several years ago from a single individual who is no longer in the reptile business. More recently, others were acquired from NH State F&G confiscations - they bring us confiscated reptiles that would otherwise be euthanized, and some have just been surrendered directly to our facility, along with venomous animals that are also here. Those particular animals are all under lock & key since we have limited background info on them.
NERD said:The context of those photos was from a reptile show @ our store last weekend, at which we displayed a variety of animals - giant pythons, croc & water monitors, tortoises, etc - and brought out some of the venomoids for pictures later that day. No one is saying "here go get a cobra for a pet." What is being said is that snakes are not horrible, terrible, out-to-hurt you animals that should be killed w/o consideration, because we get several "hey I killed a snake in my yard" calls every week. Could this have been done in a better manner? Sure - I won't disagree with that. Not everyone sees eye-to-eye on everything that happens here, both externally & internally.
Just my $.02
Kara
Jim O said:Brian,
I missed nothing. You won't get on your soapbox for what people do in their house. Why not? You say "a lot of good it does telling them how wrong they are". So how does it do good telling NERD? You have a double standard here. And deflecting from that fact by asking if I am defending them is as transparent as it gets. Follow your own advice and you will see that "maybe you just missed it".
Jim O said:I just went through why I think morons who free hand at home are asswipes, the ones who you won't get up on your soap box for because "a lot of good it does telling them how wrong they are". How in creation can you come to even the remotest idea that I support doing it in public.
Jim O said:All that I am asking for is some consistency. If people won't learn, why keep beating this dead horse? If that goes for your "friends" who free hand then why not for your sworn enemy? Seems like a double standard to me.