Well, good news. Due in a large part to the huge negative reception the bill has received, mainly our email and phone campaign, the bill has been converted from a potential law to a study bill.
The state is now required to conduct a study on the keeping of wild animals, and the potential hazards to the general public as well as the impact any legislation would have. As a part of the new bill, the agency conducting the study will be required to talk to the breeders and keepers themselves as well as other associated groups.
This is very good for us. It will make them consider the effects the reptile legislation would have that I am sure they have until now been unaware of.
I thank everyone who wrote letters or made calls. Without that this bill would have become law and we'd be stuck with it.
Below is a new article from the associated press discussing the change in the bill.
-----------------------------------
N.C. agency to study exotic animal safety, breeding
The Associated Press
The state Department of Environment and Natural Resources would study how to protect the public from dangerous animals, including whether the public should be allowed to own them, in a bill approved Monday in the Senate.
The bill was prompted in part by the December 2003 death of a 10-year-old boy who was killed by a tiger his aunt kept in her Wilkes County backyard.
The original bill, filed by Sen. John Garwood, R-Wilkes, and backed by the N.C. Zoological Park in Asheboro, would have restricted the private ownership of exotic snakes, cats, wolves and other exotic animals that posed an inherent risk to humans.
Garwood, however, agreed to turn the bill into a study measure after receiving scores of messages from current exotic animal owners, many of whom make a living raising them.
The study commission led by the department would report back to the General Assembly with recommended for the 2006 legislative session. The department would be required to consult with wild animal breeders, small zoo owners, humane organizations and others.
Hopefully, Garwood said, the panel can find ways to "protect people but still give consideration to people who raise exotic animals."
The measure, approved by a vote of 46-0, now goes to the House for consideration.
-----------------------
http://www.the-dispatch.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050523/APN/505231198&cachetime=5