Ohio's ban on sale, ownership of exotic animals to expire Wednesday

[EricWI]

Ohio's ban on the sale and ownership of exotic animals will be allowed to expire on Wednesday because it lacked legal authority, state officials said today.

The 90-day order prohibited buying or selling big cats, bears, wolves, primates, crocodiles and large constricting or venomous snakes. It would have required owners of such animals to register them with the state by May 1.

Wildlife officials said they will now have no authority over regulation of exotic animals, other than those native to Ohio bobcats, coyotes, black bears, rattlesnakes and copperhead snakes.

The ban issued earlier this year by Democrat Gov. Ted Strickland in an executive order just before he left office will be allowed to expire by his successor, Republican Gov. John Kasich.
Story continues below
Advertisement

However, Ohio Division of Natural Resources officials said in a conference call this afternoon that they expect to either issue a new rule or perhaps submit it to the Ohio General Assembly for action.

"Will move forward with getting together the chief stakeholders, allowing it to be an open process," said Scott Zody, assistant natural resources director.

"We're going to be starting from scratch trying to develop those rules," said Jim Lehman of the Division of Wildlife enforcement section.

Zody said he does not think that allowing the ban to lapse will jeopardize a multi-part agreement signed last year by Strickland, the Ohio Farm Bureau and the Humane Society of the United States. The agreement brokered by Strickland prevented an issue on farm animal care from being placed on the statewide ballot last fall.

He said he hopes compiling new rules on exotic animals will take "months, not years."

http://www.dispatch.com/live/conten...otic-animals-to-expire-wednesday.html?sid=101

 

[EricWI]

Dangerous Animal rule under review

COLUMBUS — Ohio Gov. John Kasich and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources will develop new policies and procedures for owning and selling dangerous wild animals.

Kasich supports the regulation of dangerous wild animals to ensure the public’s safety and animals’ humane treatment, according to a statement yesterday from ODNR.

Kasich also wants to develop new rules in a transparent way with public input, the nature agency said.

The governor will allow to expire the Executive Order and Emergency Administrative rule banning the “possession, sale, and transfer” of dangerous wild animals. That rule, issued by former Gov. Ted Strickland, expires Wednesday.

“Concerns were raised with the rule’s short-term and long-term funding, legal authority, safety, and the overall feasibility of being able to efficiently and effectively enforce such a ban,” said a statement by ODNR.

Despite the executive order, the Ohio Division of Wildlife does not have the legal authority to regulate non-native dangerous wild animals such as tigers, lions and many poisonous snakes, said Laura Jones, ODNR spokeswoman.

The state natural resources agency will begin seeking public input from key groups, including the Association of Zoos & Aquariums, Humane Society, Ohio Farm Bureau, the Buckeye State Sheriff’s Association, the Ohio Veterinary Medical Association and the Ohio Association of Animal Owners Inc., Jones said.

Kasich has not made a schedule for legislation or an executive order, but the nature officials expect to begin a work group possibly as soon as next week, Jones said.

Yesterday, Lorain County wild animal owner Sam Mazzola predicted Kasich’s efforts would not involve people who own exotic animals. Rather, the legislation will be influenced by the political lobbyists of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which has called for Mazzola to be charged with homicide for the death of his friend, Brent Kandra, 24, who was mauled by one of Mazzola’s bears last year.

“Those scumbags, and you can quote me on that, from PETA have all the money and all the politics behind them and they will be heard,” Mazzola said.

PETA lied to Strickland and to Kandra’s family when the organization claimed Strickland’s order could prevent similar accidents with people and wild animals, Mazzola said. Last year, Kandra’s mother, Deirdre Herbert, wrote to Strickland to encourage his proposed ban on wild animal ownership.

“It’s a real sad thing because PETA has used her love and her heart to get their message across,” Mazzola said. “They don’t care about Brent. They don’t care about his mother.”

Mona Rutger, operator of Back to the Wild animal rehabilitation center in Margaretta Township, said she would support more rules in Ohio.

Zoos and education and rehab centers for wild animals are appropriate, Rutger said.

Animal babies, such as raccoons and foxes, are adorable but grow up to be problems, she said. Back to the Wild has two bobcats that were declawed and sold as pets to owners who later could not take care of the animals, Rutger said.

Now, those cats can’t return to the wild and won’t make good pets for anyone, she said.

“You can’t predict their behavior,” Rutger said. “They can be trained, but they can’t be tamed. There’s a big difference. Wild animals can’t be tamed. It’s an accident waiting to happen.”

morningjournal.com/articles/2011/04/05/news/mj4352890.txt?viewmode=2

 

[Leif]

Thanks for the update. It's not shocking to see HSUS somewhere in there along with PETA.

 

[ThomasHicks]

That's not good news... I just hope USARK can get through to them, but it's a shame that there's really no equivalent to that to protect the ownership of mammals.

 

[kaynesully]

Hey leif there's a whole lot you don't know about the hsus, google hidden enemy the humane society of the untied states and goto the first one that comes up I think its cornucopia.com. the hsus is nothing what you think it is

 

[harleydan1956]

Am I wrong?

I was under the assumption if nothing was done to stop it, it went into law since the Governor already signed it? If it was NOT reversed, it would be law after 90 Days? The New Governor said he would allow it to become law? or am I miss informed?

 

[Abby]

I was under the assumption if nothing was done to stop it, it went into law since the Governor already signed it? If it was NOT reversed, it would be law after 90 Days? The New Governor said he would allow it to become law? or am I miss informed?

No, the new governor had the option to continue it or stop it. When he got in he decided not to enforce it for the 90 days and to let it expire. Just hope nothing permanent takes it's place.

 

[star2nv]

ok ,so is the law expired now,and no longer i effect?

 

[Gloryhound]

ok ,so is the law expired now,and no longer i effect?

Yes, but that does not mean a new law can not be proposed as a replacement in the future. The new Governor has not really made his intentions very clear on the keeping of wild animals.