Cat_72
Back from exile :)
Beardiepal said:Please don't condemn me on this post. Ethical issues always have 2 sides. There will always be the side that says don't breed this female again, freeze this baby and money money money...
On the other side people find something intrigueing about this unnatural result of breeding. I had a one eyed beardie with subsequent neuro issues 6 weeks after birth. He learned to chase his crix, but eventually he had to have silkies because of his issues. I do not believe he was in any pain..or I would with all my heart taken him to my vet and euthanized him. He now has a concrete marker in my garden with his name"Buddy" carved in it.
Is the curiosity bad. Is the genuinely comapssionate nature to see what happens bad?
I am not one to make a godly judment on this predicament. This being said,
I don't think its wrong to want to make money when you breed your beardies. If someone showed unethical, or bs business tactics, it would be known. That being said, I do believe that Jamie has shown her true colors and I believe in those colors. And believe me if someone shows tainted colors I would be the 1st to say so. Take good care all, Respectfully, Beth
Beth,
Please re-read my previous post. I specifically said that there is nothing wrong with making money on your animals.....perhaps you missed that part. I also said that there is NO reason to euthanize the baby, as long as he is doing well, and in no discomfort or his deformity is not making his quality of life lessened. And there is a lot of in-between space between the two "views" you mentioned. I'm truly and honestly glad that you gave your "BuddY" a chance at life! But would you have bred him to see if you could pass that deformity on?
The only thing I have issue with is breeding to purposely produce more babies who will maybe not be so lucky as this one, babies who have a lesser chance of survival and a much greater risk of health issues, either simply out of curiousity or greed.....sure, there may be some that are perfectly fine, but will they too be passing this on to folks who are not wanting to have this issue popping up in their breeding? What are the ramifications in upcoming generations?
It was said that about 75 babies were produced last year alone (minus the few two headers/twins that died before hatching), were all of the buyers made aware of the genetic anomaly this female may be passing on?
Just thoughts to ponder, I guess.