• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

One eyed albino boa, should I kill him?

Kill it, or keep as a non breeder/pet


  • Total voters
    120
I have never bred boas,i only keep 3 as pets right now.now that i have read more of your comments on this i have to agree on keeping the snake yourself forever or eliminating the bad gene.
 
I still think if it can be done, get them fixed and re-homed.

However, my little Gracie came from Rich's problem litter this past year. I purchased her with an agreement to Rich to never breed her in case the problems with a few of her siblings were passed onto her. I have het Albino boas so will be producing my own in a few years anyway. I am so happy to have my little girl in my home, I am glad Rich did not cull all of the offspring from that pairing.

While it is a necessary evil to cull defects, in the same light it's only fair to give them a chance with a loving & responsible home.
 
Last edited:
If your still having issues with the decision, i'll trade you. My wife has been wanting an albino boa for the last few years. I have yet to be able to afford one. I have a gorgeous baby male hypo. He's a beauty. Has a temper in the cage but settles down once in hand. He's perfectly healthy. I'll guarantee you, with a contract or what not, that it will be a most beloved pet and never a breeder. It's just another possible suggestion. It would be an early X-mas present, and one to top em all :) Either way, don't kill the animal, appreciate it, love it, and care for it like no one else would.
 
HerpLuver said:
If your still having issues with the decision, i'll trade you. My wife has been wanting an albino boa for the last few years. I have yet to be able to afford one. I have a gorgeous baby male hypo. He's a beauty. Has a temper in the cage but settles down once in hand. He's perfectly healthy. I'll guarantee you, with a contract or what not, that it will be a most beloved pet and never a breeder. It's just another possible suggestion. It would be an early X-mas present, and one to top em all :) Either way, don't kill the animal, appreciate it, love it, and care for it like no one else would.
If you new me you'd know Id never kill a snake like this :) as for the trade, I'm sorry but I'm rather fond of this guy hes my first albino boa ;) shipping from Canada to the US might be a bit of a hassle as-well.

dont worry guys if I diced to continue with a boa breeding project I think I'll holed out for a nice male motley het albino for my male :yesnod:

but thanks for the offer
 
Nice looking snake. I voted to keep it given the circumstances. Why not? May live a healthy life just to spite everyone. LOL

I had a litter in April with some weird eyes. They weren't missing, but a couple of them were hemorrhagic, and bufthalmic.......


PICT00041.JPG

PICT0005.JPG



The vet thought incubation was the cause. I did cull them however. But that was an albino x albino litter too. The siblings are all doing great though.

I wish breeders would talk more about this when it happens though. Missing eyes have been happening for a while now. Some data on the subject on the subject would be nice, but would require some risky breedings (Alb x Alb) and possibly culling entire litters for answers. That would suck. Just culling 2 sucked for me. :(


Rick
 
For a while I used to keep track of all the eye deformities showing up in the ads. In my opinion the frequency of its appearance at that point was far from being something happening just by chance. It’s been almost three years now and you may find it interesting as it turned out to be a very informative discussion:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19880&page=1&highlight=albinos+toll*

In the last post you will find a very interesting link which discusses most of the eye anomalies we see in boas but referred to albino humans. This is just a quote from that publication:

2. Albinism

Albinism is one of the most common forms of inherited visual impairment. A wide spectrum of genetic variants exist, many of which have associated metabolic or central nervous system anomalies, most commonly hearing impairment.

Anatomically, albinos exhibit excess decussation of optic nerve fibers at the chiasm with temporal retinal fibers that normally remain ipsilateral crossing to the contralateral geniculate body. This anomalous wiring limits binocularity as well as accuracy of fixation and pursuits.(5)

It is characterized by varying degrees of amelanosis due to a deficiency of the enzyme tyrosinase.

Ocular complications - Level of visual impairment is dependent on the degree of severity of these five factors:
Amelanosis of the iris and retina
Nystagmus
Foveal hypoplasia
Strabismus and impaired binocular vision
Astigmatism

Classification of Albinism:

Albinism occurs in two primary types, oculocutaneous and ocular. There are many genetic variants of oculocutaneous albinism in which both skin and eyes are affected. Most of of these variants are inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern.(5) However, the most useful division of oculocutaneous albinism for the eye care practitioner is based on the expression of the gene for the enzyme tyrosine because the degree of ocular involvement is tied to the deficiency of tyrosine and corresponding amelanosis.

Oculocutaneous Albinism:
1. Tyrosinase-Negative
The most severe form in which there is complete absence of pigment. Foveal light reflex is absent (complete foveal hypoplasia).
Nystagmus is moderate to severe.
Acuity is usually 20/200 or less.

2. Tyrosinase-Positive
Characterized by varying degrees of amelanosis.
Foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus is not as severe as T-Negative.
Acuity is usually better than 20/200.



Anterior segment presentation of a young black with oculocutaneous albinism



Fundus of the same patient.

Ocular Albinism:

X-linked recessive inheritance

Affected males have normal skin and hair pigment but show varying degrees of ocular depigmentation.

Visual acuity lies in the 20/40 to 20/100 range. (Correlates with the amount of pigment and nystagmus.)

Mother's eyes are affected. (Subclinical presentation.)

Some presentations of ocular albinism, especially in darkly pigmented individuals, can be easily missed because there is no iris transillumination and the fundus appears nearly normal. Slightly reduced acuity and mild nystagmus may be the only observable signs.

As for this particular case it’s difficult for me to cast a vote. Although culling is the more reasonable thing to do, I can see where someone that has bred these animals himself would have a hard time doing it.

Regards.
 
I'm curious if you've spoken to the original breeder about this? To spend the amount of money I'm assuming you spent to purchase them, that makes for mighty expensive pets....as well as other people purchasing outwardly normal babies out of this litter, and intending to use them for breeding in the future.
 
What puzzles me though is that we don't see that high of an incidence of eye problems in the Sharp strain. Maybe it's because they haven't been inbred too much thus far or maybe it's just because it's a different strain???

Regards
 
That may also have something to do with the pricing of Sharpe vs. Kahl. Since Kahl has always been the more affordable strain, just seems natural there would be more of them out there breeding, thus raising the chances of inbreeding albeit unknowingly.

Though it's probably going to make me somewhat unpopular, I fully intend to do some experimenting with the albino genes at a later date. This is the main reason I held back two from my litter. I want some definative answers that so far have just been speculated upon. Facts, numbers, son back to mom, brother and sister, grandson back to grandma, etc. etc. Things like this will reveal more of the nature behind the problem. As of yet, I don't think anyone has dedicated any breeding to this sort of effort.

Rick
 
I think whether it makes you unpopular will depend on what you do with the offspring. Experimentation is one thing, that is part of how knowledge is acquired...I think I will refrain from further comment at this time
 
Though it's probably going to make me somewhat unpopular, I fully intend to do some experimenting with the albino genes at a later date. This is the main reason I held back two from my litter. I want some definative answers that so far have just been speculated upon. Facts, numbers, son back to mom, brother and sister, grandson back to grandma, etc. etc. Things like this will reveal more of the nature behind the problem. As of yet, I don't think anyone has dedicated any breeding to this sort of effort.

A few things:

First, you should note that if you're starting with two albinos, there's already likely been some inbreeding depression, and which genes are fixed for what will be different compared to say, albino corns or piebald balls. So while your results will be applicable to the specific issue of eye problems in boids, it likely won't be generalizable well to other species and other issues.

Secondly, and pursuant to the above, there have already been numerous inbreeding experiments done in many species, the results of which can be found in the scientific literature. We've got quite a good handle on what inbreeding does in general, so if that's what you're after, I can send you the PDFs of some articles and save a lot of time and trouble.

Thirdly, these problems, being developmental, likely won't adhere to simple one-gene or two-gene mendelian models, so sorting out the heredity may be anything from difficult to impossible, especially with the complicating factor of environmental influences such as temperature (with the double-whammy of being inside a snake whose behavior you cannot absolutely control as compared to eggs, whose temperature conditions can be monitored and modified more easily). A large number of genes are involved in proper eye formation, and sorting out which and how many have been compromised from a limited number of offspring is going to be very difficult (this is why most genetics experiments involve high-reproduction species like fruit flies or plants).

Fourth, unless you up your sample size, you're going to run into the issue of psuedoreplication adversely affecting sample size. Repeated measures (clutches) can help alleviate this, but not entirely; a starting group of 6-10 would be more productive and less prone to errors and experimental complications. For example, what happens if your female gets injured and needs an X-ray? You've just bombarded the ovaries with mutation-inducing radiation, and from then on, can't be sure if problems come from that or the breedings? That's just one example, but the point is, small sample sizes make it hard to tell what's a real effect.

Fifth, what do you intend to do with the offspring? There'll be a lot of these things, and euthanizing all of them would be expensive. If you do, I'd reccommend doing full dissections of all of them, both eyes and body cavities, in search of other abormalities, plus some simple morphological examinations such as vertebral counts, since you'd have the bodies on hand. In that event, I can recommend sources for formaldehyde and ethanol for preservation.

Sixth, is it really worth it? We already know that albino snakes are inbred, and that inbreeding inevitably causes hidden genetic problems to manifest, including deformities. What would really be gained, other than an understanding of the particulars of a line which, given that already-apparent defects, is likely to become inviable anyway within a few more generations?

I'd recommend reading up on what's already known of inbreeding in the scientific literature first; it may be that this idea would give us only modest additional knowledge in return for great effort, time, and money on your part.

I don't mean to sound down on this; believe me, I'm the *last* person to disparage experimentation. But experimentation must be done right in order to produce valid results, and sometimes it turns out that we already know so much about a given topic that, unless there's a reason to suspect something terribly out of the ordinary in this case, it's not really worth the time to pursue. Although reptile development is complicated by fluctuations in temperature, there's still little I can see that would lead me to suspect there's more going on than simple inbreeding depression. Hard numbers would help solidify that, but those could be acquired through existing breeding records (assuming records have been adequately kept).

Henry
 
That may also have something to do with the pricing of Sharpe vs. Kahl. Since Kahl has always been the more affordable strain, just seems natural there would be more of them out there breeding, thus raising the chances of inbreeding albeit unknowingly.

Rick, I don't recall exactly on top of my head but if I remember right albino boas (Kahl) were far more expensive in the begining than what the Sharp strain is priced today. But you are right, with time the Kahl strain has becme more accesible to the general public, particularly animals with this genetic deffect. I'm pretty sure we are just scratching the tip of the iceberg, as we don't know how many "carriers" are out there.

Though it's probably going to make me somewhat unpopular, I fully intend to do some experimenting with the albino genes at a later date. This is the main reason I held back two from my litter. I want some definative answers that so far have just been speculated upon. Facts, numbers, son back to mom, brother and sister, grandson back to grandma, etc. etc. Things like this will reveal more of the nature behind the problem. As of yet, I don't think anyone has dedicated any breeding to this sort of effort.

No criticism whatosever but I'm in absolute agreement with Henry on this one. You will get into a lot of trouble, expenses, etc. and you will not be able to get any statistically valid results.

Regards.
 
Wow, that's a hell of a post Henry. Definately more to think about than I was aware of. I understood a larger scale operation would give better answers and all, and I am not large scale at all, and the big guys don't seem to talk about it much. LOL But there is a lot I didn't concider. Thanks for the eye opener.

I'd love to read the PDF's on the subject though. [email protected] Feel free to send away. Can never learn too much.

Rick
 
Wow, that's a hell of a post Henry. Definately more to think about than I was aware of. I understood a larger scale operation would give better answers and all, and I am not large scale at all, and the big guys don't seem to talk about it much. LOL But there is a lot I didn't concider. Thanks for the eye opener.

No problem. Experimental design can be extremely difficult, and in recent years has only gotten more complicated as we've found new problems that can ruin results; it's to the point that we've had to invent entirely new statistical methods for dealing with some questions.

Primary, though, is always the issue of sample size, and in breeding experiments, lineages are the proper sample size; no matter how many breedings there are, the results are always statistically non-independent (since, after all, one generation gives rise to the next one).

I'd love to read the PDF's on the subject though. [email protected] Feel free to send away. Can never learn too much.

PM me to remind me if I forget; I'll have to wait until I'm back in lab tommorrow, as I don't have access from home to the full-text articles.

Henry
 
Just an addendum with a couple of articles I found that I feel are pertinent to this discussion. I'm pretty sure I can't just post full-text here, since it's copyright of the journal, but I can give the abstracts, and give PDFs to those interested.

A Comparison of Inbreeding Depression in Life-History and Morphological Traits in Animals
Marc A. DeRose, Derek A. Roff
Evolution, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Aug., 1999), pp. 1288-1292
abstract said:
The current study tests the hypothesis that life-history traits (closely related to fitness) show greater inbreeding depression than morphological traits (less closely related to fitness). The mean and median slope of the standardized coefficient of inbreeding depression (the slope of the linear relationship between F and the trait value) for life-history and morphological traits were compared. Slopes for life-history traits were higher than those for morphological traits. At F = 0.25 (full-sibling mating), life-history traits experienced a median reduction of 11.8% in trait value, whereas morphological traits showed a depression in trait value of approximately 2.2%.

This paper is significant to this discussion because it means we're looking for the wrong things: small size and physical abnormalities are noticably only long after there has been significant reduction in lifespan, fecundity, infant survival rate, etc. The problem is that life history traits are much less obvious and often require controlled observation and testing to detect. Essentially, by the time we're seeing morphological signs, we may have already done a lot of damage.



Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus
MADSEN T. ; STILLE B. ; SHINE R. ;
Biological conservation, 1996, vol. 75, no2, pp. 113-118
abstract said:
Although inbreeding depression is well-studied in captive animals, its role in natural populations remains controversial. We provide information on an isolated population of snakes (adders Vipera berus) that has been separated from neighbouring populations by the expansion of agricultural activities in southern Sweden. Total adult population size is < 40 adult individuals, and the mating system is such that a few males have disproportionate reproductive success and hence father most of the progeny each year. The isolation and small effective population size (< 15 adults) promote inbreeding. Compared to other non-isolated Swedish populations of adders, the isolated population shows (i) a smaller litter size relative to maternal body size ; (ii) a higher proportion of deformed and stillborn offspring ; (iii) a lower degree of genetic heterozygosity due to fixation or near-fixation of alleles ; and (iv) a higher genetic similarity among individuals (as measured by DNA fingerprinting). The incidence of inviable offspring was sharply reduced when we introduced males from other areas into the isolated population. These results suggest that the lower reproductive output and viability of adders in the isolated population result from inbreeding depression. We also present data to falsify two alternative hypotheses : the characteristics of the isolated population are not due to environmental contaminants (metal and pesticide residue levels are low) or to poor food supply (adult adders are in good physical condition and their neonates are of the same size as in other populations).

I present this one because it's directly studying snakes, showing that the same rules apply to snakes as other organisms studies more frequently.

I've got PDFs of both, if anyone wants them (just PM me).

This, of course, leads to a new question: is there a significant different in clutch number or total neonate mass (relative to maternal mass) in albino-line snakes than in normals from diverse backgrounds? I'd predict yes, and I'd be interested to see if the data from breeders supports that.

Henry
 
He didn't ask if he should keep it as a pet, but if he should sell it for a pet. Now that makes the answer stickier in my opinion. You'd almost have to keep it to be sure.

Caden
 
do you still have him/her? heck I would love to have it for a pet...keep the poor thing alive as long as it is healthy and eating fine...if every want to get rid of it..put me in line!
 
ill take it and pay shipping
its very nice regardless of the eye
i would only keep it for a pet though ,you wouldnt want to take a chance with the genetics
 
Thanks guys, hes doing very well I'll try to get some better pics up soon, dont worry I'm not going to be breeding him, i have some bigger plans as far as males go ;)
 
Back
Top