Rich,
If you already responded to my suggestion for this type of feedback, sorry. I don't remember seeing it, but know I suggested something like this a few days ago or so. This time I think I have added a twist that might make it more amenable to Fauna.
I thought about implementing something like that a while back, but it would be a lot of work on my part.
What I had figured I would do would be to set up a forum where only I could create new threads. The thread would be only one of two formats (or maybe both): (1) A simple poll, with NO replies allowed, or (2) if the person in question is a registered member here, provide a link directly to their "traders rating".
This sounds very similar to the feedback left at Ebay and other large auction sites like GunBroker.com and AuctionArms.com. You get to click off something like:
Good, Neutral or Bad, then you can add a few lines (at most) of comments. The person you are rating has a chance to reply in like manner with a few lines of reply. Anyone can rate another person, for example the buyer rates the seller and the seller rates the buyer
BUT only if you were actually involved in a transaction of some sort. The deal did not have to go through but you had to have committed to the deal to leave feedback. As I understand, this would be completely automated and your work would be minimal; although I do know that in rare instances a company will edit feedback at the request of the person who left it. All of the feedback is accessible by any site user for viewing. A link under the user's name, who you want to check, goes right to that user's feedback.
If you somehow could get a system like this in place, it would save you lots of work and lots of headaches with the BOI. It would cut out all the crap left by people who only want to get into the fight and sling mud as only two people's comments would be listed for each sale for either party in that deal. Now in order to do that they actually would have had to bought something or at least initiated the deal. The deal initiation could be through a
buy it now button link. Of course since this is not an auction an item could have been sold already, so dealers would have to keep up on eliminating items from the for sale list if already sold. This should be something they would be able to do just by clicking a single link on a list of all items they have listed (not a bad idea in itself). Is making a list like that available to sellers a feasible idea? Of course a dealer may say this would be a problem, because he may have forgotten to immediately remove an animal if he sold it in his store, or through another site. This really is not a problem, or should not be, as the potential buyer who loses out because of that could click on feedback and indicate an animal was not available by your having a fourth option to the three above. This feedback option would say:
Item Already Sold. The failsafe for the dealer is that you could set this up so that the first time this button is clicked on any particular sale item, it will not register but will send notice to the dealer to get that ad out of the classifieds because if he/she does not remove it then anyone else who initiates a deal by clicking on the
buy it now button clicks the Item Already Sold button will have their feedback register as a black mark against the dealer. Of course to prevent someone (a real jerk) from trying to circumvent this failsafe by trying to leave feedback on a single deal multiple times, once feedback is left by either a seller or buyer for a particular item or for a particular deal (if more than one was for sale and there could be future deals), it can not be left again for that same deal. This would require the system to generate a
deal number which would take the place of an item number on the auction sites. Same could go for want ads for people who say I don't want it anymore.
My guess is that this would dramatically change the current format of the for sale/wanted ads at fauna, and maybe the whole site. Yet there maybe a great benefit to it because dealers seem very willing to accept this format of feedback. You may have some of your advertisers telling you they want the BOI as is; however, I would be willing to bet there are a lot of people who will not advertise on fauna because of the BPOI. I am also willing to bet that most of them would find a feedback system like this to be acceptable, but then I am not too lucky at gambling. From what I have seen of the feedback systems at the three sites I mentioned, it works pretty well and it warns both potential dealers or buyers of possibly unscrupulous people who may be trying to strike up a deal with them.
All the best,
GB