CODbeast said:
I have been to jesus's house
And you just happened to find your way to this thread and decided to jump in and defend Jesus. What coincidental timing. I'm sure you weren't put up to it. But, either way, that's irrelevant.
CODbeast said:
Next i see people talking about overheating. People, the temps that day was 86 degress.....86 degree weather would not cause a retic to overheat....How do i know this....because my retic's hotspot is around 90 degress, and they are doing perfect.....
You seem to like to throw the concept of 'common sense' around quite a bit. I find that ironic since your simplistic and self-serving analysis of the situation shows a marked lack of sense.
Your theory might hold some water if the retic happened to have been transported in a mesh or wire cage where a state of dynamic thermal equilibrium would be easily maintained with the ambient tempterature in the car. However, as I understand it, it was kept in a plastic Rubbermaid-like tote. This is an enclosed space with a very greatly decreased amount of air flow. In the likely event that this tote was exposed to direct sunlight (even filtered through glass), it'd continue to build up heat which would have a diminished capacity to dissipate due to the lack of thorough ventilation.
Those of us that actually employ some degree of common sense concede that we don't KNOW exactly what killed the snake. It could be heat, exposure to toxins, an underlying illness or any combination of these factors. But to just pop in here and catagorically state there's
no possible way it was anything other than a cause that can be directly blamed on the seller is purely self-serving fiction.
CODbeast said:
If the seller sold or traded a sick animal, even if he didn't know, its still on the seller to make it right. And if the seller was so adamant about wanting to know, then he should've gotten the necropsy.
It's ludicrous to buy into the idea that there was absolutely NO VETS in the state of PA that could/would do a necropsy on the retic. That theory has long since been shot all to hell and back.
Why should be seller be responsible for arranging the necropsy? Once the trade was agreed to, and the snakes changed hands, it wasn't his animal anymore. Until it's proven that the seller was responsible for the snake's death, he doesn't owe them anything. In my eyes, recourse is defered until culpability is established, and forfeited when it can't be established. For whatever reason, a necropsy never happened. So, despite what you mistakenly call 'common sense' there's no proof, either way.
CODbeast said:
And of course a scammer is going to say the snake was healthy, why would he say otherwise...lol....Just look at all the threads here about people getting sick and diseased animals, and the first thing out of the scammer's mouth is "It was healthy when it was here".....Sure it was buddy.....that's like going to a prison and asking all the criminals, who's guilty....let them tell it, they're all innocent..
That concept can be twisted to suit either side, at need. It serves no purpose. Of course Angel/Jesus are going to act like the innocent victims of circumstance. Like it or not, your analogy cuts both ways.
Let's not forget something. Angel clearly stated that he had previous knowledge of the dangers of the pest strips in question, but he went through with the transaction anyway. He wasn't unaware that they were being used, and that they're potentially dangerous. There was an abundantly apparent risk from the get-go, which he blithely accepted. If we're ASSuming that it was the pest strip that killed the snake, doesn't his own obvious disregard for and acceptance of that risk make him equally responsible?