Mine goes back and forth from 98-99. I just ain't that keen on what I can turn off in there.

I don't have a slow load problem though. It don't take very long to start up and run.
As long you have a fair amount memory and a decent size CPU it won't take forty forevers to load. However, you will most likely see a noticeable speed/performance difference if you were to trim your Startups down.
The system I mentioned with 98 processes only had the bare minimum of required memory (256MB) to run XP, much less other programs. Plus, the processor was a lowly 1.
(something) GB.
Like Rich said, everything sets itself up to load at Startup, and very few programs need to. Printer software is my biggest pet peeve. Most people think that if the program doesn't load at startup that it won't work at all. Not true. It takes some time to fine tune Startup but the benefits are usually worthwhile. Most people are amazed and tickled to death to have their PCs running like it did when it was brand new.
Look at it this way - Let's say you have 98 different vehicles. Every morning you crank all 98 of 'em and let 'em idle just in case you decide to drive one. You'd be wasting resources. Gas, engine wear, cranking time, etc... It's the same way with running process/Startup programs. The big difference between the car/programs analogy is the computer programs are all running on
one engine (CPU) and
one fuel line (RAM).
About the only program that really needs to load at Startup is your antivirus and/or some other security type program. The best way to stop programs from loading at Startup is to open each program and look for "Preferrences" or some other category that should have an option to "run at Startup" and uncheck that option.
Not all programs will give you that option, that's when you resort to going into the "Startup" folder (Start/All Programs/Startup
in XP) and simply delete the program's folder. That won't delete the program from your PC, just from the Startup folder.
And of course there's always a few nagging programs/processes that Rich can tell you about that have to be stopped by altering the Startup configuration by using the System Configuration Utility (
in XP and earlier versions you can easily access this by: Start/Run/
and type in msconfig and hit Enter or click OK). In System Configuration Utility click the
Startup tab on the far right option and uncheck the process you want to disable.
This is where you need to know what each task and/or program is.
You won't delete anything from your PC by disabling it in the System Configuration Utility and the program will still work just fine when you open it by clicking on it's link on your desktop or in the Start/All Programs list.
The best way to find out what a program or process is is to Google the name of it. Quick & simple. There are some sites that have Running Tasks/Processes libraries that you can use, too. Here's one that gives a good explanation on them:
http://www.liutilities.com/products/wintaskspro/whitepapers/paper8/
Here's a link directly to that site's processes library:
http://www.liutilities.com/products/wintaskspro/processlibrary/
Here's a link to that site's .dll library:
http://www.liutilities.com/products/wintaskspro/dlllibrary/
Those library links, and more can be found on that first web page, down in the lower-righthand part of the page. I cannot vouch for any of the downloads or products that site offers, I've never tried any of them. I trust the site, though. It's not a hacker site or shady site. Here is another one that I trust:
http://www.processlibrary.com/
What's the latest word on Vista these days? Has it become useable yet?
I call it - AstalaVista. (See you later!)
John's wife's experience and opinion is the norm still among most people that are at least somewhat familiar with PCs. The only people I've heard say that they thought it was OK were people who have never used another OS and Best Buy computer department employees.
Personally, I think it's another ME (Millenium Edition). It's garbage and Microsoft is scrambling to replace it, not fix it. I would be real surprised if it they try to keep it & improve it. I would wait at least another year before I even thought about getting it. Heck, I bought W98SE even though XP had been out for almost a year and a half. I'm glad I did, too. I avoided most of the headaches. I still use W98SE on a system and I still like it better than XP for most applications.
I like the idea that I could populate up to 8 gig of RAM on the motherboard with Vista.
You'd just about have to.
Asta la vista, Vista!!!
But then again, to be fair - I am a recovering addict & alcoholic and you know how us addicts/alcoholics hate change.

Hahaha!!!
Ya'll have a great day!
Mike