• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Recreational debate

lucille said:
I think that must be in lawyer DNA somewhere....... :)
Click to expand...

Are you insulting me intentionally? I'm really not sure.....ever since this photoshop incident I have lost my self confidence and am worried that no one will trust me anymore :(

(If you really want to learn how to drive people crazy take a course in Logic. Once I learned how to formulate a valid argument life got to be a lot more fun.)
 
kiote9 said:
Are you insulting me intentionally? I'm really not sure.....ever since this photoshop incident I have lost my self confidence and am worried that no one will trust me anymore :(

(If you really want to learn how to drive people crazy take a course in Logic. Once I learned how to formulate a valid argument life got to be a lot more fun.)
Click to expand...

This statement, the one directly above, is invalid. I have found that IF I merely make a statement, much less formulate it in a valid argumentative form, is THEN sufficient to start argument. heh heh heh

And I'd be happy to trust you. You can send the first check to me anytime you want. There is, of course, a minimum investment, a one time start up fee, and an automatic bank transfer form necessary, but once all that is done, I'll be happy to trust that I'll be paid. Regularly.
 
wilomn said:
This statement, the one directly above, is invalid. I have found that IF I merely make a statement, much less formulate it in a valid argumentative form, is THEN sufficient to start argument. heh heh heh

And I'd be happy to trust you. You can send the first check to me anytime you want. There is, of course, a minimum investment, a one time start up fee, and an automatic bank transfer form necessary, but once all that is done, I'll be happy to trust that I'll be paid. Regularly.
Click to expand...


IF I were attempting to start an argument (which I am not), THEN I would take the time to formulate a valid and logical argument.
 
kiote9 said:
Are you insulting me intentionally?
Click to expand...

Well, I've taken several courses in logic but can't decipher this. :raspberry Seems like EVERY time there is EITHER the word 'lawyer' or "Lucille' in a phrase, folks get in a tizz.....
 
kiote9 said:
IF I were attempting to start an argument (which I am not), THEN I would take the time to formulate a valid and logical argument.
Click to expand...


So, what you're saying here is: IF you COULD, THEN you WOULD? It's OK, I don't hold women to the same standard as men, so no need to feel bad about your inability.

After all, YOUR femininity is NOT in question.
 
lucille said:
Well, I've taken several courses in logic but can't decipher this. :raspberry Seems like EVERY time there is EITHER the word 'lawyer' or "Lucille' in a phrase, folks get in a tizz.....
Click to expand...

I'm being defensive and argumentative! LOL
 
lucille said:
Well, I've taken several courses in logic but can't decipher this. :raspberry Seems like EVERY time there is EITHER the word 'lawyer' or "Lucille' in a phrase, folks get in a tizz.....
Click to expand...

You should be assessed warning points for improper usage of the logic form of argumentation.

You must put it into an "if" "then" formula.

For example, if you use this formula then you will be formattin properly your position.

But again, allowances must be made for gender.
 
wilomn said:
But again, allowances must be made for gender.
Click to expand...


Wes, you certainly deserve an 'A' for having an unerring sense of what constitutes the subject of various people's hot buttons.
(And then pushing them).... :raspberry

Is this thread going to deteriorate into a gender battle? :uzi:
 
Sasheena said:
But the sky was already vermillion.... why would I have photoshopped it vermillion if it was already vermillion???

Now HERE, HERE"S a photoshopped picture....
Click to expand...


Sasheena, you called me out and I responded promptly.

Now you BRAG about your ability to photoshop AND post a picture that you OBVIOUSLY photoshopped!

Where are you now?
 
wilomn said:
You should be assessed warning points for improper usage of the logic form of argumentation.

You must put it into an "if" "then" formula.

For example, if you use this formula then you will be formattin properly your position.

But again, allowances must be made for gender.
Click to expand...


lucille said:
Wes, you certainly deserve an 'A' for having an unerring sense of what constitutes the subject of various people's hot buttons.
(And then pushing them).... :raspberry

Is this thread going to deteriorate into a gender battle? :uzi:
Click to expand...

LOL, Lucille!!! He just admitted there was an allowance made for the difference in gender. He did NOT claim the male gender to be superior. This was left open for interpretation and I CHOSE to believe he means the female gender to be superior.
 
lucille said:
Wes, you certainly deserve an 'A' for having an unerring sense of what constitutes the subject of various people's hot buttons.
(And then pushing them).... :raspberry

Is this thread going to deteriorate into a gender battle? :uzi:
Click to expand...

It's doubtful. Some of you who were born winkiefree are simply NOT up the minimum standards necessary for a gender battle.

Afterall, if only one side is armed ( we got the brains, this is well known) then is it REALLY a battle? Or is it just another slaughter?

I vote slaughter.
 
wilomn said:
You should be assessed warning points
Click to expand...


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA coming from you that is purty dang funny, lol.... :rofl:
 
wilomn said:
It's doubtful. Some of you are were born winkiefree
Click to expand...

I do not know to whom you refer; after all it is a terrible evidentiary error to assign a gender to me, this is the internet and who know what gender you are, or I am?

However, the feminine gender is unquestionably superior.....
 
kiote9 said:
LOL, Lucille!!! He just admitted there was an allowance made for the difference in gender. He did NOT claim the male gender to be superior. This was left open for interpretation and I CHOSE to believe he means the female gender to be superior.
Click to expand...

The above statement, made by one of the "winkiefree" proves my earlier assertation.
 
wilomn said:
The above statement, made by one of the "winkiefree" proves my earlier assertation.
Click to expand...

Where on earth did you find the word 'winkie'.?... :rofl:
 
Just in case you can't, meaning the "winkiefree" in particular, figure out just what I am referring to, let me tell you to what I am NOT referring to.

There is a song, done by one of the best bands ever to grace us with their presense. The song has the words "women are smarter" and I was NOT referring in any way to anything even remotely resembling this particular error of wording.
 
Great .... I go to work and have one of the worst work days of my professional life :hot: (worse even than the day that my department head told me my teaching was "PUTRID") and come back to all these messages! Well I was gone all day, but I'll get caught up.... going to respond to each message as I see it without reading ahead....so we'll see just how out of sync I can get this vermillion-colored thread! HA!
 
DAND said:
Where is your proof that the sky was already vermillion?
Click to expand...

I don't have to prove that it's Vermillion, my photo did that. I even stated my source. You have a problem with it, you take it up with my source. and NO I'm NOT going to tell you where I stated my source (what thread number) it was with my original picture used on this thread! Go lookitup!

:hot: :hot: :hot: :hot: :hot: :hot: :hot: :hot:
 
Back
Top