• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Reptile Ethics, When do we say thats enough

BRIAN

Yes it should be a vet or vet assistant or other qualified person with proper facilities and or staff to aid the animal in its total recovery as prescribed by law. There is a reason people must be trained to do this properly I sure the hell do not want someone to do an operation on me that is not qualified and you probably wouldn't either.We should expect and demand no less for an animal.

I have the knowledge to preform this operation but just because I have the knowledge does not make me qualified. I would most likely end up killing the animal. That is a risk I will not nor am not willing to take. There just is no reason for this operation. Or for that fact any operation on a reptile that is not required do to life threatening circumstances. Reptiles do not react well to surgery.

Scott Bice
 
Jesse... What's up with the attack on Scott. He came on here helping you with your case??? In regards to the question...There are reasons for the regulations. Even if you are "qualified" to do the surgery you cannot legally. Works the same for animals or people. A doctor can prescribe you medication for your child but, you can't do surgery on a child yourself? It's pretty simple. I understand your argument however, no matter how you look at it it's illegal. Thanks Ray G. HBR
 
Guys, if that is illegal, then so is giving your own snake a shot (which apparently they both are). Yes, this is more complicated. But, as Scott said, a 1st year Biology student could do it. I fully believe that if I was given a half dozen or so dead snakes to practice on, the meds and tools required, and a copy of Mader's Vet. surgery guide, I could do this operation. Not saying I ever would, because it's not something I believe in doing. But, I think most of us could do this. Especially, if we were only doing the cauterization/ligation type of procedure.

Take it one step further. Let's say you have a vet, who is willing to let you watch the operation a couple of times, and maybe is even willing to give the meds required to do it yourself. Much the same way we came to be able to give our own shots. If that is the case then, this would be no more illegal than that bottle of Baytril we keep in the filing cabinet, to use on all of those URI's WE diagnose. Again, yes, this is a little more complicated than giving a shot, but it not brain surgery. LOL couldn't resist.

I'm not in any way, shape, or form for injurying animals. But, I'm also very against wrongful prosecution of reptile handlers for things that are no worse than what happens on animal ranches every single day. And just because this guy may be doing wrong doesn't mean that you or I couldn't do it correctly. Don't make rules you yourself can't live with.
 
Brian

If a Vet prescribes meds to you to use its legal Same as if a DR prescribes them for human use. Up to and including shots.

Anyone foolish enough to preform a surgery after watching it needs their head examined. Just because you can do it seen it done or have an idea how to do it DOES NOT substitute the years of education and skill behind a vet. That is why the state requires a VET to preform the surgery.

And I can live with the laws to protect animals from potential death that is uneeded for pure monetary gain.
 
That is why the state requires a VET to preform the surgery

OK, I just did a little research. Marshall Farms, probably the world's biggest ferret breeder. Apparently, uses regular employees to perform thier spay/neuter "surgerys." I would think that these surgerys would be much more difficult and invasive than removing a venom gland. They also apparently perform these surgeries at a very young age. All practices which seem to have the American Vet. Assoc. up in arms. Yet, Marshall farms is still business. PETA certainly has plenty of web sites dedicated to it, yet the practice continues. Where are the lawyers on this one? PETA's sites say they "have been cited," but don't go beyond that. Now, granted I only spent about 10 minutes looking into this. But, I wanted to give you an example of what I am talking about.

These are cute little ferrets, of which, THOUSANDS are sold every year. They are carried in just about every chain pet store you can think of, and yet, Marshall Farms is still doing all this stuff everyday. If that is the case, do you really think some yocal removing the venom glands from rattlesnakes is gonna get into a bunch of trouble? I doubt it, I could be wrong, but I doubt it. Juries would be much harder on a huge company like this cutting into literally thousands of 3 week old baby ferrets every year, than they would be on some guy and HIS pet rattlesnake. Yet, it seems nothing is standing Marshall Farm's way. In fact, I have owned a Marshall Farms ferret (maybe even two, now that I think about it) and there was nothing wrong with it. So, apparently, it can be done.
 
Although I'm rabidly anti-venomoid, I need to clarify something here. Those three letters behind a person's name are seemingly being granted mote weight than they're often worth. When it comes to dealing with reptiles, I've found that the average vet's knowledge pales in comparison to that of an intermediate/advanced hobbyist. Indeed, the herpetological knowledge of many vets is limited to having a copy of Mader's Reptile Medicine and Surgery available to consult. Most of their education is focused on companion animals, and not exotics such as reptiles.

This is not to disparage or take away from any vet, as I've also encountered some exceptional ones, who's degree of expertise can never be rivaled.
 
Ken

Your very correct about the letters behind the name. I will not dispute that as I to have seen many vets that don't know jack about reptiles.In fact I know of a few that call breeders/ keepers for aid when they are confused. The problem is in the wording of the law and its interpetations.Believe me I am suprised I have not gone bald from ripping hairs out over this issue. The bottom line until laws are made more reasonable and sinceable is they are there and we have to either change them or obey them. We as keepers that have the great responcibility to care for our animals must do what is in the interest of the animals well being and needs.

These people are not keeping or carrying for the animals but doing surgery then selling them and that is the crime be it recognised or not. My concerns are for the animals well being and with the high mortality rate it is obviously an operation that should not be preformed. Combined with the dangers if the surgery is not done correct and the reptile regains its venom capabilities.

Brian

Thank you for the example I was not aware of that but will look in to it. Word of warning believe half of what PETA says and you might get a tenth of the truth. They have a very clear agenda. If the operations were going on and they were cited it would be a matter of public record and one i will be looking for.

The type of operation however your talking about is one that is extremely easy and well documented and on Mammals that do very well with Medications. You cant compare Mammals to reptiles when it comes to surgery and meds.they just dont react the same.

Well you guys are seeing a fraction of what I go through every day i dive in to this subject. Atleast I must say here your logic is much better and your knowledge higher then most I have had to talk to. Maybe some Rogain is in my future. God I love a good debate and discussion.

Scott Bice
 
Scott, I love it too.

Now back to it. I would have to disagree that spaying/neutering is a simpler operation than removing a gland located on the side of the head. The mammal operation would require going in through the skin, the muscle, fascia, moving the intestines aside, and then either removing two very highly vascularized organs or at least cauterizing them. True abdominal surgery. Also in the case of a 3 week old ferret, you're talking about a pretty small field in which to work. Removing or cauterizing a gland located outside the skull (I think thats correct) seems to me to be much easier and less invasive, than what is being done to the mammals.

Drugs are certainly an issue, but most of that stems from a lack of testing. I often think vets are guessing when they prescribe dosages for reptiles. I usually get the drugs from the vet, and then figure my own dosages using the material I have at home. The mammals probably have better reactions to drugs, because all drugs are tested on mammals. Labs have figured out exactly what works based on years of trial and ERROR experiments.
 
Scott, I love it too.

Now back to it. I would have to disagree that spaying/neutering is a simpler operation than removing a gland located on the side of the head. The mammal operation would require going in through the skin, the muscle, fascia, moving the intestines aside, and then either removing two very highly vascularized organs or at least cauterizing them. True abdominal surgery. Also in the case of a 3 week old ferret, you're talking about a pretty small field in which to work. Removing or cauterizing a gland located outside the skull (I think thats correct) seems to me to be much easier and less invasive, than what is being done to the mammals.

Drugs are certainly an issue, but most of that stems from a lack of testing. I often think vets are guessing when they prescribe dosages for reptiles. I usually get the drugs from the vet, and then figure my own dosages using the material I have at home. The mammals probably have better reactions to drugs, because all drugs are tested on mammals. Labs have figured out exactly what works based on years of trial and ERROR experiments.
 
I have been looking for this link for a few days now it is from the SHHS website and wourth a read.

http://www.venomousreptiles.org/articles/55?venomsid=62c5be999bad6c409484794fadae28fd

Have a good read. I have to get ready for a herp society meeting tonight but rest asure Brian I will be back for the med talk. Just wish more members would actually join in on this conversation we can use constructive input from more than just 3 or 4 of us.

Scott Bice
 
I suspect that there's a great deal of agreement on some of the subjects at hand here... Many of us disagree with venomoid production regardless of who does it, for reasons which have been stated many times on this site and others, I suspect ALL of us can see the negative aspects of an unliscenced individual attempting ANY kind of surgery on an animal, especially one with a fairly delicate physiological balance....

The only real issue of debate here seems to have been the legality or illegality of creating venomoids in a garage. Legal is not always identical to moral or ethical and it's important to keep the issues separate.

Scott posted some very specific information which would seem to indicate that the action is illegal in the state which it (the specific act that promted this thread) was performed. The question now comes down to enforceability... The laws are in place that could be enforced, but it seems that they frequently aren't when reptiles are concerned. This is both positive and negative.

On the one hand, anyone who is abusing reptiles should be prosecuted in the same manner as someone who sets their dog on fire (unliscenced and unneeded surgery falls under abuse in Oregon if I read Scott's earlier post correctly). A living thing is a living thing.

On the other hand, the last thing our hobby needs is more bad publicity or additional restrictive legislation. I fear that the legislative solution wouldn't be to prosecute the individual responsible for the specific act but rather some kind of widespread law that makes it more difficult to own herps. Purely as a hypothetical, I believe the media and courts would utilize a train of thought such as- "He's being cruel to animals. He's being cruel to animals to make them less dangerous. Venomous snakes are dangerous. Dangerous things should be illegal." I don't trust ninety percent of the people I meet on a daily basis to tie their own shoes much less watch a news program and realize that the information is highly subjective... they simply swallow what they are told and then demand that "the government do something about it" (Monkeypox in prarie dogs is a good example, there were really VERY few cases considering the total population of animals, but CNN called it an "epidemic" and the USDA temporary ban has been in place nearly a year now).

Basically the question becomes... Go after someone doing something that you believe to be immoral and *might* be illegal and chance a slight risk to reptile owners everywhere... Or stay quiet and let the individual get away with their backyard butchery?
 
Scott, I read the procedures. And now I'm certain it would be easier to do a gland removal than it would be to spay a mammal. MUCH less invasive.
 
Seamus, I love it when you're on your game man. That's exactly what I'm talking about. Further, remember the post started because the supposed butcher, got, what he considered, poor animals. Tempers flaired, and it degenerated into a mess. I don't know that anyone has come forward, to say that this guy has actually injured or killed an animal while performing the procedure. *Remember folks doing the procedure does not count as injury, if it is done correctly, that is not what I am arguing. He may very well be working with a vet to obtain the meds, tools, etc. He may be very good at performing it.

If that is the case, and he can do this correctly, do we really want laws passed/enforced which would keep him from doing it but allow a vet to do it? Again, not defending the actual procedure, just defending our rights as herp owners to handle things like this on our own.
 
It's been busy the last few day's so I appologise for not getting back sooner.

From the state officials I have spoke with regaurding the reasoning for the laws reguarding especially surgical procedures is simple " To insure the HIGHEST quality of care and treatment to ANY animal." Most of them are not opposed to a person giving meds or noninvasive treatments to animals minus surgeries. Again it goes to the Spirit of the law not the Letter of the law.

When it comes to Laws and Herps its always a touchy subject. Problem that I hear and see all to often is "IT DOES NOT EFFECT ME". BS...... If we as keepers / breeders / sellers do not take a proactive roll in helping to educate and create laws we stand high chances of being heavily regulated right out of our hobby.

There are so many cases to back that statement its scarry. Just look at how many places have size laws reguarding to how big a snake you can keep is.

When it comes to the medical aspect of the hobby we all do whats right for our animals but how many of us are willing to do a surgery on our own if we can get a vet to preform it for us. I know how hard it is to find one qualified but better them do it right then us kill our animal.

As for the individual who is doing it in Oregon by his own admission he had no scale so how the hell was he even administering meds properly. PICK IT UP AND GUESS METHOD?

This thread can go forever when you bring in ethics and medication and the laws and I hope to god it does maybe a few people will start getting proactive and start helping to create solutions to probelms and inform others to protect our rights and the animals rights. From the few i see posting here its obvious a few of us care. and thank you

Scott Bice

PS i need coffee
 
Good points...

Yes it does become an emotional issue. Enforcable? Maybe Maybe not. Another question arises.... Do we fail to turn in someone for cruelty issues?? Is it because we fear more negative publicity and additional outcry from the uneducated public. Is it due to the idealism that,"nothing will be done anyway"? Or.. do we fear that "we" may come under scrutiny as well? In extreme cases of cruelty, where it is an ongoing continuous situation, I say step up. Yes, it does place both "us" and the general public at odds. However, I've yet to meet a reporter that is not willing to publish both sides of the issue. If it is handled in an intelligent manner. I think for the most part we can police ourselves. We know who the bad guys are and we simply place concentrated pressure on them from the rest of the herp community Scott and myself both were recently involved in a rescue. It was plain and simple neglect of a number of herps.(Dead and rotting even!) We did not resort to calling the authorities. We simply communicated with other area herpers and made them aware of this person's "Ethics". He will simply find himself being ousted from dealing with anyone on a commercial or other basis in our area. I guess what i'm getting at is.. Don't be afraid to first place peer or herp community pressure on those type of people. If that doesn't work... Take it up with the authorities and make every effort to assist or educate them. We can't always turn a blind eye. Sorry it's a little off topic. In regards to the thread... I've made my points and hopefully made a few people think. I know I've seen other issues here that I've come to consider as well.
Thanks Ray G. HBR
 
I have been reading all of this....

First, let me say that there is a very good debate going on and there are some very good points being brought up. It is amazing that the original post was so ignorant and yet after the flaming war died down, there is a very logical debate continuing. Now, as for the accusations of illegal activity, I find it amazing that it is now stated as a fact and people have gone as far as to say that "I said that I did this" and " I said I did that", when in reality I never said I did anything and all of this arose from a simple post of a bad experience I had with a wholesaler. All of the other rumors and here-say were brought up to take the attention away from the original post, which was done successfully. It is kind of ridiculous that some people have chosen to take it so far and have gone to such lengths to try and make their accusations facts. For example, I have gotten threatening phonecalls and harassment ever since my phone number was posted on the net, I have been turned in for god knows what over rumors and accusations that I never agreed with or confirmed, I also had a mysterious person impersonate me over the phone and try and get my utilities and other accounts changed,closed, and messed with since my information was posted. I don't want to start a flame war, I am not going to comment further on any of that. As for the debate at hand, there are alot of comments that I agree with on this thread. Once you get past the rants and holier than thou statements. I think the bottom line is that we all have different views and ways of going about this hobby. We will all never agree totally about everything because we are all different, but it is good that we do agree on some of it, there is hope for this hobby yet.
Kevin Smith;)
 
Well in keeping with the spirit of a logical debate / discussion and since you appear to want to be part of it by posting here let me ask you some questions Kevin to possibly help us all understand why someone does deal in venomoids !!!

As a seller the animals are under your care durring their stay with you and if one needs treatment how do you treat them?

You yourself stated you did not have a scale so how can you properly give them medications ?

Next you have this surgery done and inflate the price of the animal dramatically which is nothing but "surgery for profit". Do you feel it is right and a moral practice?

How would you feel if a animal you sell as basically a safe animal does bite and kill someone?

And would you allow your kids to play with such an animal?

You talk about the HOBBY. What happens if your venomoids do cause deaths and therfore create strick laws where as people can not keep them or for that matter create laws that further restrict all herps more?.Is it wourth it to you to make more money and see the hobby more restrictive?

Here is your chance to inform us of why it is ok from your stand point.

Thanks You
 
Kevin

No you did not admit these things in that thread. You deliberately avoided the direct questions posted to you in that thread. These so called attacks on the fact you work/perform work with venomoids was brought up due to the fact that it may have had bearing on the animals you recieved. The accusations in regards to what you do were not second hand or rumor. A few of the persons posting were there with Ray during the conversations with you...it came from you.. I do have to say I do not and never will condone threats or any type of "terrorism" towards you or your family. I may not agree with you but, I feel that "if" you continue it will be a problem with the authorities. It is NOT a matter to be taken up by private citizens and should be limited to informing authorities and allowing THEM to make a decision. In regards to "venomoids" I simply hope it is being done legally, by a recognised professional ,for a "good" reason and with the utmost care in regards to the animals welfare. If you are going to come on in this thread.. how about this time do a few things... answer the questions directly, do not start with name calling and express your opinion backed by fact, or intelligent responsible replies. You'll find that if you can do this everyone will have an "intelligent debate" not a childish name calling contest.
 
Okay...

Well in keeping with the spirit of a logical debate / discussion and since you appear to want to be part of it by posting here let me ask you some questions Kevin to possibly help us all understand why someone does deal in venomoids !!!

>> It is my right to deal in venomoids, I feel they do serve a purpose and are a very good tool to use inorder to educate about reptiles. I know that reason is not good enough for alot of people against venomoids, but then again, no reason would ever be good enough for some people. That is fine, everyone has a right to their opinion.

As a seller the animals are under your care durring their stay with you and if one needs treatment how do you treat them?

>>most of the time I am able to treat the animals myself, if it is beyond my capabilities, then I have friends and local vets that are more than happy to help out. The only animals I have ever had problems with, were from the seller in the original thread. I am like most everyone else that treats their own animals, I have access to a large library and also the internet for information. As far as the original thread that started this debate, you can gather from reading it that the animals that were mentioned were in terminal condition and were unfit to be sold, let alone been able to have been venomoided. There is simply no excuse for sending out animals in that condition and that is one of the reasons all of the accusations were brought up to distract from the subject at hand.

You yourself stated you did not have a scale so how can you properly give them medications ?

>>For the record, I did own a scale, but it was borrowed and never returned, so I had to order another one. I did not get a chance to explain that, since there were so many flames being thrown and I apologize for not explaining in the original thread.

Next you have this surgery done and inflate the price of the animal dramatically which is nothing but "surgery for profit". Do you feel it is right and a moral practice?

>> Yes, I do feel that it is a moral practice, from my own stand point and for my own reasons. No one has an idea of what costs are involved, so it is really hard to judge what is a fair price for a venomoid. I do think that prices are ridiculous sometimes for some animals, but people are free to ask what they want for their animals. There are plenty of other reptiles on the net that have outrageous price tags on them, but it is a free world and people are free to ask what they want. I try to ask reasonable prices, but yes, I have to make some profit. This is similar to importers that pay $10 for an animal and then ask way more on the retail market. That is their right, and I don't see tons of people jumping them for it. Not all venomoids are marked up that high, King cobras are a good example, a nice malaysian will cost close to $1000 when it is hot, a venomoided one is usually anywhere from $1200-1400, I consider that a fair price considering they don't cost anywhere near that when they are imported. Bottom line is that anyone is free to ask whatever they want for their animals, if someone doesn't like the price, they are free to choose not to buy it.

How would you feel if a animal you sell as basically a safe animal does bite and kill someone?

>> This is kind of a ridiculous question, in which anyone capable of rational thought would know the answer to, but I will answer anyways. I am just like most others(I hope), I feel that life is a very valuable thing and I would feel bad if I sold an animal that killed someone. How would you feel if you sold a hot snake to someone and it killed someone??? Or is that different? I tell people that these snakes need to be handled with the same precautions as if they were unaltered, but they are free to do whatever they would like. I also tell people that buy venomoids from me that they need to test them regularily to make sure that they do not have functional venom delivery systems. Other than that, it is out of my control, just like it is out of any other sellers control once the snake is purchased. If the surgery is performed correctly, the chance of regeneration is next to none. The stories I have heard of regeneration are rumors to which there has never been any facts provided to how the surgery was performed or by whom.

And would you allow your kids to play with such an animal?

>>That is also a pretty ridiculous question, but once again, I will answer, NO, I would not let my kids play with such an animal, but then again, I wouldn't let them play with a constrictor over 2ft,a hognose snake,falsewater cobra, or any other potentially dangerous reptile. Would you let you your kids play with any of those??

You talk about the HOBBY. What happens if your venomoids do cause deaths and therfore create strick laws where as people can not keep them or for that matter create laws that further restrict all herps more?.Is it wourth it to you to make more money and see the hobby more restrictive?

>>What happens when mambas bite their owners??? What happens when an unaltered snake bites someone?? What happens everytime something bad happens in this hobby?? Venomoids have less of a chance of causing damage in our hobby than any hot snake. Look at how much trouble was caused over the person bit by his unaltered black mamba, now if that snake was a venomoid and he was bitten, how much trouble would it have caused?? No trip to the hospital, no one clinging on for their life, no reporters going crazy.......hmmm. Every person that handles their venomous reptiles without taking the proper precautions risks our hobby. By your logic in the last sentence or your post, everyone who sells a potentially dangerous reptile is risking making our hobby more restrictive.
Kevin Smith


Here is your chance to inform us of why it is ok from your stand point.
 
For Raymond...

"The accusations in regards to what you do were not second hand or rumor. A few of the persons posting were there with Ray during the conversations with you...it came from you.."

>>Did I ever state that I did the surgeries, if I didn't, wouldn't that make it second hand and rumors since it was others that don't know me and have no idea what is going on that were accusing me?

I know that the person the original post was about, is your friend and you have already showed greatly that you are going to defend him, but you don't have first hand knowledge of anything I do, so therefore you are not qualified to state that what you accuse me of is a fact. When I spoke on the phone, you weren't on the phone and you are not the one that recieved the animals, So I will state again that these are rumors and second hand accusations.
As for admitting to anything, why should I agree with the accusations?? I don't think you ever urged your friend to tell the truth about the condition of the animals sent out.
I am not throwing flames at you and I don't have a problem with you at all, I am just asking you questions inorder to try and here how you justify these statements that you have made when you don't have first hand knowledge of all of the facts.
I would also like to say, that we all are different individuals with different opinions. We all have different beliefs and different ideas about how to apply ourselves to this hobby. With that, we can often times agree on certain subjects, but others we will never agree on, that is great, that makes for good debates. I also feel that if we look at this thread in its entirety, it is nice to see what rational debate has come from such an irrational original post.
Kevin Smith
 
Back
Top