• In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.

    Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
    Sponsors - Eliminated
    Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
    Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days

    Account Upgrades Page
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

response to neg. coral snake article

Brian - LCRC

New member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
67
Location
5734 Allen Ridge Road, Blenheim, South Carolina
Leeway Corucia Research Center (LCRC)


To: Will Vash - Palm Beach Post staff writer


Hello Mr Vash,


On your article : Coral Snake 'attack' puts puppy in Peril

(when I sent this I put the words of the title in the following color order...red,yellow,black, red yellow, black, etc. It doesn't show here)


I wish to point out that snakes in general use their venom to subdue prey.
It is a very costly and body taxing excersize. As such, in a case of a non prey situation ,under attack,
they use their venom only as a last resort. The Coral snake is a very shy secretive snake with a very
small mouth used mostly for subduing invertebrates and frogs. The unfortunate dochshund was probably curious and was nosing the snake around if not outright tried to kill it. The response by the snake was a defensive one. The use of the term attack suggests the snake went out of it's way to infect suffering on the dog. Unfortunately, this instills more negativity on these animals who are already facing peril with the large scale habitat destruction in Southern Florida. May I suggest a a unilateral approach in wording if a similar story appears.

The public at times does not understand the full situation and will act emotionally charged against an animal using human values. :shrug01:

Case in point: Steve Irwin Mr. Irwin, in a foolish daredevil move got stung by a ray. The ray was trying to defend himself. Unfortunately, due to Mr. Irwin's popularity, the crazy's of the world started a vendetta against all rays. There was even a local case in South Florida where a man in the name of Steve Irwin tortured and slowly cut up a living ray while recording it.

The problem with the current story if not worded correctly is that people now will be out to kill all snakes. These are the situations that we all need to avoid. :yesnod:

Thank you for listening.


Brian L. Schnirel
LCRC
 
Good letter...

Living here in Central Texas I have to debunk the dangers of Coral Snakes quite often. Of course it's a little easier when you can show them one and they realize how small they are and that you have to be an idiot or very careless to get bit by one.
 
Back
Top