Ophis
New member
What you said. Lets try to introduce some relavant dialogue as a change of pace.Jim O said:Now we're getting somewhere. LMAO.
What you said. Lets try to introduce some relavant dialogue as a change of pace.Jim O said:Now we're getting somewhere. LMAO.
robin s. said:mike portuguese would be this :
"Não se deve comportar publicamente como um cara de cú para que não sejas tratado como um, como é merecido e devido, e acaba assim."
robin s. said:anywho here is the translation which has already been sent to rich so you dont have to tattle anymore:
"its rather sad you have no idea what time zone you are in especially considering you are a moderator of this site."
Therein lies the problem, Rich. I guess I won't be playing in Lucille's playground either since it seems that only her rules apply here, and those rules appear to vary from playmate to playmate.WebSlave said:Lucille is the ONLY person on this site to which I have "given" them their own forum.... I gave her no particular requirements about what to do within "her" forum.
robin s. said:mike portuguese would be this :
"Não se deve comportar publicamente como um cara de cú para que não sejas tratado como um, como é merecido e devido, e acaba assim."
I suspect that it may be alluded to...well, nevermind.Golden Gate Geckos said:May I inquire what one must do in order to "get their own forum" here on Fauna?
Oh boy.Jim O said:I suspect that it may be alluded to...well, nevermind.![]()
Golden Gate Geckos said:May I inquire what one must do in order to "get their own forum" here on Fauna?![]()
Ophis said:Oh......cause I was thinking of maybe the "Spew vitrialic hatred in convaluted foriegn languages and have it masterfully translated much to your shagrin" forum. Guess that won't work.
Ophis said:Kinda reminds me of a sour jaw breaker. All sweet and mellow on the outside, but once you spend some time getting past that sweet exterior....you find out what kind of sour mouth puckering nastieness is lurking below the surface.
Yet, at the same time,When I make someone a specific moderator of a site, as I did for Lucille in THIS forum, I don't leave strings attached. It's that "authority" and "responsibility" thing.
Do you not feel that the very creation of this thread qualifies as abuse of this system?I would agree that this should be done privately. I am not privy (nor do I really want to be) in why it was not. But the milk has been spilled, has it not? And now this has become an exercise in discussing how abuses of the functions on this site are handled, it appears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilomn
Take a step back Rich and look at it this way. What if I came to you and was complaining about how neil was zinging me (which he has not) and making fun of me and not playing nice. What would your reaction to that have been?
If someone were using the functions of this site in order to do so, they would likely be assessed warning points if I determined your claim was valid. If they are doing it outside of this site, then you are on your own. If I do not agree with your assessment, then I would ignore you.
robin s. said:yeah something like that rich