• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Shrillomn, a brief expose

SoulSmilen said:
I was just going by the Paid Membership level charts and what happened with my membership; hard for my ducks to be in a row when those ducks aren't in a row.

Is this something that just recently changed? I know before I paid for my membership I was not able to change my title and the option did not show up in my profile. The minute I paid it and went to my profile it was there. That was not so long ago, just a few weeks. My member title is one of the first things I try to update on any site I'm registered to; I know for a fact I was not able to change it before I paid.

Such is life... I don't think I look all that foolish, though, when it still seems a little unclear as to what's what.

I believe the user titles option was changed back when I decided to lift the restriction for paid memberships for posting on the BOI. Made other changes at the same time. Didn't figure it was worth my time to update the chart as I doubted they were significant to anyone considering a paid membership. And no, I don't tell everyone about what changes I make in the background. Just as I have stopped asking for opinions beforehand. Sorry about that. But that doesn't excuse your accusatory tone of your post, now does it?
 
WebSlave said:
I believe the user titles option was changed back when I decided to lift the restriction for paid memberships for posting on the BOI. Made other changes at the same time. Didn't figure it was worth my time to update the chart as I doubted they were significant to anyone considering a paid membership. And no, I don't tell everyone about what changes I make in the background. Just as I have stopped asking for opinions beforehand. Sorry about that. But that doesn't excuse your accusatory tone of your post, now does it?
Nope, all out wrong; plain and simple. My membership started 11/24 this year; the custom member title wasn't an option before then - neither was the option to upload an avatar. It might be something that's changed since that date, but hey, whatever, make it up as you go along.. no skin off my back. I'm not going to get in a pissing match with you; you'd win, of course, since you have the control panel.

At any rate, I'll be thinking of a member to ape and antagonize since it's obviously allowed. Who knows, could be fun.
 
SoulSmilen said:
Nope, all out wrong; plain and simple. My membership started 11/24 this year; the custom member title wasn't an option before then - neither was the option to upload an avatar. It might be something that's changed since that date, but hey, whatever, make it up as you go along.. no skin off my back. I'm not going to get in a pissing match with you; you'd win, of course, since you have the control panel.

At any rate, I'll be thinking of a member to ape and antagonize since it's obviously allowed. Who knows, could be fun.

Sorry it's such a big deal to you. But I can tell you for a FACT that the member custom titles was DEFINITELY available to registered members before 11/24. I don't remember exactly when it was, but it was absolutely more than two weeks ago. Quite likely you just made a mistake trying to utilize it.... Wouldn't be the first time someone made a mistake like that and then played the Chicken Little act. :rofl: Sorry to burst your conspiracy bubble.....
 
WebSlave said:
Sorry it's such a big deal to you. But I can tell you for a FACT that the member custom titles was DEFINITELY available to registered members before 11/24. I don't remember exactly when it was, but it was absolutely more than two weeks ago. Quite likely you just made a mistake trying to utilize it.... Wouldn't be the first time someone made a mistake like that and then played the Chicken Little act. :rofl: Sorry to burst your conspiracy bubble.....
You're right; I'm totally new to forums and have no clue how to access and manipulate such complicated functions.

My turn to use the obnoxious smiley. :rofl:
 
Shrillomn said:
Not even close!

Well... a little close. Neither of you is who you say you are and there's a bit of a blind eye being turned by the people with their finger on the button. Seem to be saying something in a high profile and slightly hyperbolic way...

'course I've always been a fan of most fictional vigilantes. Slap a cape and a secret identity on someone and they can do any damn fool thing in the name of entertainment.
 
Can't edit but... it also occurs to me that if there's going to be a lot of these spoonerclones, I should probably register Heinous Shamely as a precautionary measure.
 
Seamus Haley said:
Can't edit but... it also occurs to me that if there's going to be a lot of these spoonerclones, I should probably register Heinous Shamely as a precautionary measure.

I think that's a wonderful idea Heinous. The more masked avengers there are running around here, the more likely it is that someone will get tired of it and put an end to the nonsense.

I only exist here to point out the idiocy of having a site such as this without rules in place to ensure legitimacy.

Oh, and to have a little fun with those that have difficulty seeing the irony of it all.
 
Shrillomn said:
I only exist here to point out the idiocy of having a site such as this without rules in place to ensure legitimacy.

I think that's a little strong. I don't think this site is idiotic at all. I do think some people get way out of hand from time to time but they are not illegitimate.

I would like Fauna to return to being a nice hang-out. But it is far from being idiotic now.

And, the BOI, from what I have seen, it is still fulfilling its function, there are people pointing out bad guys, and others saying different, and as always the people who read are the judge.
 
Shrillomn said:
I only exist here to point out the idiocy of having a site such as this without rules in place to ensure legitimacy.

lucille said:
I think that's a little strong. I don't think this site is idiotic at all. I do think some people get out of hand from time to time but they are not illegitimate.

Not that I would ever want to speak for Mr./Ms/Mrs. Wollock, but I read that comment in a different light, Lucille.
My take was that the idiocy was not having the rules that require someone to properly identify themselves before participating in a site that is based on posting facts.

Based on his/her previous posts, I believe that this person has been pushing for the recently relaxed rules to be tightened up again. This is most likely, not the way to effectively enact change, but it does bring some interesting things to light.

My guess is that Shrillomn will address both of our comments and better explain his/her previous post. Perhaps we could even get a clarification on the gender of this individual, so that we don't have to continue with all of this he/she guessing.
 
Mike Greathouse said:
Perhaps we could even get a clarification on the gender of this individual, so that we don't have to continue with all of this he/she guessing.

Easy resolution.... It's Pat!!
 
Mike Greathouse said:
My guess is that Shrillomn will address both of our comments and better explain his/her previous post. Perhaps we could even get a clarification on the gender of this individual, so that we don't have to continue with all of this he/she guessing.

I wouldn't hold my breath on Shrillomn letting the Cat out of the Bag regarding gender Mike. Why would he / she want to reduce the number of possible suspects by half?


Personally, I have enjoyed the appearance of the new Phantom Avenger. While I agree that i would not have chosen this particular method, I just spent half an hour re-reading each and every post by Shrillomn and, I have to say, I did not find one statement I did not heartily agree with. The rather effective needling at Wes "Shoot First and Get the Facts Later" Pollock was just an unexpected bonus.
 
That "Pez" has chosen to hide behind the cloak of anonymity is worthy of some ridicule, but relative to many others here, only a smidgen. While the rest of us are known entities (I think), many are able to go a bit over-the-top in their use of the forums to attack others because they might as well be as an unknown. Take Wes as an example. Or as "the" example. He has very little expectation that he will ever actually face any of the entities he trashes. As for possibly alienating future customers, sorry but he's not risking much there either.


John and Mike I salute you. In recent threads, MG Reptiles and Ali@Crazy Cresties to name two, you stepped forward to point out that in one case Wes "invented" facts in order to then use them to bash another poster, and in the other decided to make the usual ASSumptions and bash another. While we all make mistakes and post inaccuracies at times, it was clear that Wes fabricated information. Once you pointed such out, in both threads Wes ran backwards faster than I have ever seen, to a comical degree. Not surprisingly, the threads also became much more civil from that point on.

I owe you a round of your favorite adult beverage for this one John ....
The rather effective needling at Wes "Shoot First and Get the Facts Later" Pollock was just an unexpected bonus.
...... as I need to spread more karma around before I can pop you a couple of those dingleberries. One or two more quotes like that though, and you can join me on Wes' "Ignore" list :D
 
Suncoast Herpetological said:
I wouldn't hold my breath on Shrillomn letting the Cat out of the Bag regarding gender Mike. Why would he / she want to reduce the number of possible suspects by half?


Personally, I have enjoyed the appearance of the new Phantom Avenger. While I agree that i would not have chosen this particular method, I just spent half an hour re-reading each and every post by Shrillomn and, I have to say, I did not find one statement I did not heartily agree with. The rather effective needling at Wes "Shoot First and Get the Facts Later" Pollock was just an unexpected bonus.
AHHAhahahahahaHAHAHAHAHahahahahaHAHAHahahahahahaha

Someone must have peed in your oatmeal. I don't recall doing so, but I sure would if I felt in necessary.

AAHAHahahahahHAHAHAHAHAhahahhahahahAHAhahaHaha
 
The Circus is in Town!!!

Laaaddddiiiieeess and Geeentleeemeeenn...we now present the articulate, well thought out and erudite musings of Willomn!!!


Wilomn said:
AHHAhahahahahaHAHAHAHAHahahahahaHAHAHahahahahahaha

Someone must have peed in your oatmeal. I don't recall doing so, but I sure would if I felt in necessary.

AAHAHahahahahHAHAHAHAHAhahahhahahahAHAhahaHaha

If you are going to do nothing but act the Clown Wes...save some time, Drop your pants, paint your ass red, put on a funny wig and start riding a unicycle. You have pretty much worn out the AHAH.....gag.
 
Last edited:
Suncoast Herpetological said:
Laaaddddiiiieeess and Geeentleeemeeenn...we now present the articulate, well thought out and erudite musings of Willomn!!!




If you are going to do nothing but act the Clown Wes...save some time, Drop your pants, paint your ass red, put on a funny wig and start riding a unicycle. You have pretty much worn out the AHAH.....gag.
AhaHAHahahahaHAHAHAHahahahahaHaHAHAHAHahahahahaha

johnnyboy's got a BIG red one too.

AHAHAhahahahAHAHAHahahahahahahAHHAHAHahahahah

Like I'd take orders from a tool like you.

AHAHahahahahAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahAHAHAHAHahahahAHaha
 
Wilomn said:
AhaHAHahahahaHAHAHAHahahahahaHaHAHAHAHahahahahaha

johnnyboy's got a BIG red one too.

AHAHAhahahahAHAHAHahahahahahahAHHAHAHahahahah

Like I'd take orders from a tool like you.

AHAHahahahahAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahAHAHAHAHahahahAHaha


And yet another pail full of wisdom and thought dipped out of the Kindergarten Well.

The sad thing Wes is that your opinion actually used to be valued here. No one ever particularly liked your God Complex attitude and shoot from the hip and damn the collateral damage method of presenting yourself but you did have a fair amount of credibility. You put, at least, a modicum of thought in your posts and actually considered your chosen position before shooting off the cannon which is your mouth. Apparently the meds have worn off and we are left with nothing but the God Complex and the oral Howitzer.

Keep blasting indiscrimanately at anyone who does not actually accept you as an all knowing Deity Wes. That should be, roughly, the entire population of the planet
 
Back
Top