• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Shrillomn, a brief expose

Holand%20puppets%20%20puppet%20guild%203.jpg

krusty.jpg

Puppet2.gif



Couldn't help myself. This is TOOO funny
 
crotalusadamanteus said:
Holand%20puppets%20%20puppet%20guild%203.jpg

krusty.jpg

Puppet2.gif



Couldn't help myself. This is TOOO funny
Is that Shrill-o-troll pulling Jim F's strings, or vice versa? Or should we just call them troll one and troll two?

Hey wait, I have a solution. Maybe Jim F should simply put Wes on ignore and then he would not have to subject himself to that which he finds so awfully objectionable here. After all, I don't recall Rich appointing anyone sheriff, at least not yet anyway. In fact, the ignore feature is available to anyone who chooses it, and IMHO would be best off used by people who don't get along with each other. Then nonsense like this entire thread would not have gone nearly as far, and (well spoken as he believes himself to be) Shrill-o-troll would not have much audience for his drivel. But then again...

Here's a question for trolls one and two. If two trolls post over and over and everyone else ignores them, are they still trolls? Ah well, not of much matter as one defines cowardice and the other conceit and perhaps even narcissism. Let the readers decide which is which, or perhaps both are both.
 
The joke

As the mystery writer has stated in other threads his purpose is to point out what can be done do to the lack of moderation on this site. The ability to generate a fake name and have a separate IP isn't really that difficult. Use your imagination and the public library, or have dial up and DSL, or gee several possibilities come to mind....take my laptop to my favorite brew pub (coffee house also works) and have some beers and write on their wifi. So I am sure its not the first time nor the last that a false name has been used. So the persistence in trying to point it out is fruitless, since I know it could be done with or without moderation.

For some who came to Fauna in 04 and tried to change the world with talk of all getting along, about the time Rich created "Hell" for the Wes and Neil war it might be a cruel revelation that Fauna actually existed before her name appeared. Her faithful followers, who manage to take time from their own mis deeds of using Fauna for their own personal singles bar should be able to at least contribute something beyond the drivel that they throw as post counts. Or maybe a few should try just for one day not typing but reading, laughing and enjoying the drama that is present. The bottom line is this is a reptile site, a very good site, not your nice singles bar situation. The main draw of this site has been the BOI, where people are given a chance to determine rights and wrongs. Does anyone really believe that Bad guys and scammers deserved civility, Upstate Exotics? cant remember maybe Upstate was before Lucille, but I seem to remember some pretty heated things going in the time before the niceties were here. The BOI was great long before the so called pre Wild Wild West, who remembers Richie Luna "the Ferret" and Adam Block(not that Richie was a bad guy) or Richie and several others he hammered into showing that they lied and cheated.

Or for those who need a clear picture, as course as Wes may be, and I haven't always liked what he does, I would rather deal with him than the glory hounds of sanctimonious crap. He has a fantastic amount of knowledge, and awsome animals.....can anyone show one bad guy post about him? But the real kicker is, if he says he likes you its the facts, if he says he doesn't he wont hide it. If he disagrees with you he won't smile and then try for phone sex to smooth it over. he wont delete posts to try to change the world impression of himself(even if he had the ability).
Lucille in post 113 of this thread you made the following statement.
Wes, take some responsibility here. If you feel your own words cast you in a negative light, perhaps you should not have said them.
Thats got to hurt because you would just delete your posts.

You need to pay for that forum "Wes" just so you can't be put on ignore.

He probably thinks I am an idiot, he has a right, but I know what he thinks of me. There is no typing a persona on fauna(wow it rhymes) and then stabbing in the back in other forms of communication. How many of you taking your shots at Wes can say that???

Maybe, we need to ask Dan Felice about his birthday phone encounter as an example of the type of two faced, slimy souls that seem to want to control and manipulate what is a great site? Or the bottom line Lucille, his PM to you makes perfect sense when you know what the references are, and I hope your not going to try to pretend your that stupid about your own activities as to believe it is gibberish.....oh wait thats exactly what you did. Sorry my mistake! As Mark offered in post 116 pretty straight forward.
 
Jim O said:
Is that Shrill-o-troll pulling Jim F's strings, or vice versa? Or should we just call them troll one and troll two?

I've alluded it to it, I've been asked about it, I've received several PM's from individuals who have done their own research and I figure I might as well state it.

While playing with the marionettes can be fun it can also be very tiring to make sure that you don't knock the curtain down that is hiding the orchestrator. Evidently, this curtain wasn't nearly as well placed as what one had hoped.

So, let me ask this question of you Chamco point blank. Are YOU Shrillomn? I want you to go on record here and now and answer this. We've already formulated our opinions, gathered our facts, and now want to pose the question to you.

Griz
 
Dragondad said:
He probably thinks I am an idiot, he has a right, but I know what he thinks of me. There is no typing a persona on fauna(wow it rhymes) and then stabbing in the back in other forms of communication. How many of you taking your shots at Wes can say that?

I haven't taken any shots at Wes in this thread. Took a few at a couple people but they were apparantly too subtle to be understood for what they were however...

I have probably disagreed with Wes more often than most fauna members simply because, through various websites, I have interacted with Wes more often than most Fauna members. It means there have been more things I agreed with him on too. We've taken shots at each other, some genuinely felt, some more because it was the form of address that was appropriate for the individual forum but it has always been at ideas rather than one another as individuals.

I can agree completely with the above quote though- Wes will never attempt two faced manipulation and has never deliberately hid an opinion that he felt was logical and genuine just because it wouldn't be popular. Anything he says is something he means and backs up and none of it is popcorn fluff carefully engineered for some idiotic popularity points. He's also not about to delete things that are, retrospectively, in error or where he found himself to be incorrect. He'll admit a mistake and apologize for it (if an apology is appropriate) but he won't hide it, the way some contemptible subhuman filth will.

I made a post earlier, few pages back, about how some individuals are simply beyond redemption as people. Utterly useless, profoundly stupid and just a drain on the genuine efforts of everyone around them- some of these scumbags hide it better than others and some are certainly more calculated and dishonest in their actions. I've got my list of who I have determined to be valueless as a human being and devoid of the ability to perform worthwhile acts. Wes isn't on it. Couple other posters on this thread are... Wes isn't.
 
Griz and Jim O. and others,
Seems that Group A here wants to paint Group B as the puppets, with Pez as the puppeteer, while it would seem that same Group A is on some sort of a vision quest to find out the true identity of the masked he-she :rofl: Now you and your "PM'ers" are playing detective ....... aka being manipulated ..... :rofl: Now that you have "formulated your opinions and gathered some facts" .......
Griz foams:
So, let me ask this question of you Chamco point blank. Are YOU Shrillomn? I want you to go on record here and now and answer this.

Kiss my a$$ Bob. Are you some kind of F'ing idiot ? I want you to go on record here and now and answer this :rofl:

Detective Bob. Instead of beating around the bush, show some balls. Maybe get a life too. Pathetic.

For other sensible followers of the forum, I have family visiting with lots of kids, and my access to the computer is exceedingly limited right now. So I may not be able to come back to laugh at Bob again anytime soon. What a waste of time it is here.
 
Chameleon Company said:
Griz and Jim O. and others,
Seems that Group A here wants to paint Group B as the puppets, with Pez as the puppeteer, while it would seem that same Group A is on some sort of a vision quest to find out the true identity of the masked he-she :rofl: Now you and your "PM'ers" are playing detective ....... aka being manipulated ..... :rofl: Now that you have "formulated your opinions and gathered some facts" .......


Kiss my a$$ Bob. Are you some kind of F'ing idiot ? I want you to go on record here and now and answer this :rofl:

Detective Bob. Instead of beating around the bush, show some balls. Maybe get a life too. Pathetic.

For other sensible followers of the forum, I have family visiting with lots of kids, and my access to the computer is exceedingly limited right now. So I may not be able to come back to laugh at Bob again anytime soon. What a waste of time it is here.
AHAhahahaHHAHAHAhahahahahahHAhahahahahAHHAhahahahahAHahahahaHAhahahahahAHAhahahahahAhahahahaha

Well, there ya go folks, total prevarication.

I only took you off ignore for this one post to see just how you would avoid stepping on your own tongue here.

Back you go, with the negative karma you deserve for being a lying sack of crap.

bye bye chumpco.
 
Would one of you gents care to step up to the plate and make an accusation ? Whose got some balls out there ? Griz, you have the "facts". Is there not a man amongst you detectives :rofl: ? Maybe a woman ?

Bye Wes :dgrin:
 
Did you all see that? Just like I forecasted, the wind changed and so did Jim's response. You are way too easy Jim......

Ok Jim, I am ACCUSING you of being Shrillomn. My information certainly supports it. The information obtained by individuals on this board that are far more respected than you have drawn the same conclusions. So, Jim, answer the question....

Are you Shrillomn? I am accusing you point of blank. So answer the question instead of beating around the bush or acting like a 4 year old child who just got his sucker taken away, answer the question Jim. Go on the record once and for all and let us see whether you have the cajones to finally tell the truth.

Griz
 
Bob,
Why not just post the evidence and let everyone draw their own conclusions?

Regardless of the true identity of Shrillomn, I still think it's a bit sad that this silly thread has torn such a rift through some of the membership here.

Happy Holidays...
 
I will be more than happy to post what I have once Jim answers the question. And I am sure a few others who actually are far more talented in this area will be glad to show their cards as well (theirs is even more obvious then mine). But, to simply hand this to him prior to him answering the question would make things way to simple for him. Jim, as is evident by the Childs thread, will do his best to spin things away from what everyone understands reality to be. Unfortunately, a few individuals actually bought what Jim has stated on that thread.

Here is Jim's chance to own up to what he knows the truth to be. So Jim,

Are You Shrillomn? :reddevil:

Griz
 
Mike Greathouse said:
Bob,
Why not just post the evidence and let everyone draw their own conclusions?

Regardless of the true identity of Shrillomn, I still think it's a bit sad that this silly thread has torn such a rift through some of the membership here.

Happy Holidays...
Mike,

I have spoken my suspicions. They are not proof by any means. But it seems Jim F became pretty unhinged by Bob asking the question, didn't he?

Frankly, I believe he either is Shrillomn or is writing the posts. I said as much in a PM to your friend John Schmitt several days ago. If he isn't, let him deny it publicly for all to see. Would he risk being caught in a lie? Or is being known as a coward hiding behind a "fake" ID worse?

Either way, it is irrelevant. He has become as much a troll as anyone on this site. Just look at this thread if you doubt that. And that's just by posting under his "true" persona.
 
Griz said:
Did you all see that? Just like I forecasted, the wind changed and so did Jim's response. You are way too easy Jim......

Ok Jim, I am ACCUSING you of being Shrillomn. My information certainly supports it. The information obtained by individuals on this board that are far more respected than you have drawn the same conclusions. So, Jim, answer the question....

Are you Shrillomn? I am accusing you point of blank. So answer the question instead of beating around the bush or acting like a 4 year old child who just got his sucker taken away, answer the question Jim. Go on the record once and for all and let us see whether you have the cajones to finally tell the truth.

Griz


I agree. and i thought so once i started seeing the login dates and the kinds of responses from this wacko.

Jim knows everyone
Shrillomn Knows everyone

Jim targets certain people
Shrillomn Targets certain people The SAME people.

The writing styles are so alike it makes me want to vomit. actually i think i did just a little... in my mouth...

Also, neither like it when someone "goes" in their cheerios...

He dosnt have those Guts to tell the truth, that would be too easy, and would make anything he has ever said, lose credence right here in this thread! why would somone EVER want to do that, just to tell the truth over a silly little thread????
 
Jim, say it is not so!! You did not come here with two different user names to support your cause, right?

I think a response to Bob's question is in order.
 
Whether Jim is the ghost member or not really does not matter....

Just Jim being Jim is enough all by itself.
 
shrap said:
Whether Jim is the ghost member or not really does not matter....

Just Jim being Jim is enough all by itself.
AbsoFRIGGINlutely.

How are the cheerios there chumpco, salty enough for ya?

AHAHAHahahahahaHAHAHAHahahhahahahHAHAHAHAhahahahahahAHA

See Mike, right there is how to properly use the "ahahahaha" to great effect and affect.
 
Wilomn said:
AbsoFRIGGINlutely.

How are the cheerios there chumpco, salty enough for ya?

AHAHAHahahahahaHAHAHAHahahhahahahHAHAHAHAhahahahahahAHA

See Mike, right there is how to properly use the "ahahahaha" to great effect and affect.


AHAHAHHA!!! I think i might even see some "Chocolately" Goodies mixed in with those cheerios!!
Stir em up REAL good Jim!!!!
 
Back
Top