EMERALDGUY33
New member
The point of my last (2) posts is this: If anyone digs deep enough, or is anal enough, they can find discrepancies in anyones story. However, all it boils down to is circumstantial. Borderline grasping at straws. Still, nothing convictable. Which brings me to this:
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have a idea,I want whomever to call me in the mouning and I will tell you the evidance I have to prove Neil did this,But in return I want each persons word that they will not post or have it posted .This is to protect the people that are willing to go to court against Neil.Email me and I will give you my number.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Dave-
Theoretically, were I to call you, what would it prove? You could tell me that Elvis is your next-door neighbor. You can say whatever you want. You could lie your @ss off. How, as the receiving party, would I know your "evidence" is accurate? How am I to know that you are truthful? Verbally spoken "evidence" is equivalent to hand typed screen word "evidence". The only "true evidence" is that which can be visibly seen. I.e: photos, documents, etc. etc.. If you can tell me how, over the phone, you can beyond a shadow of a doubt prove Neil's guilt to me, then I will call you tomorrow. If not, well, that brings me to:
If this matter is so near and dear to you, why have you,yourself, not already brought Neil up on charges? Why do you not have any copies of a police report where you reported Neil's alleged "transgressions" to the T.P.D.? Why have you not already brought litigation against Neil? Why have your other "people", that you are trying to protect, not joined you in reporting Neil to the proper authorities? Or in bringing litigation?
My final point(s) is this:
1: It is easy to take sides here.
2: It is easy to say you have proof.
3: It is easy to attack one side or the other.
4: It is hard to substantiate your claims.
5: NO concrete evidence, supporting Neil's or Dave's claims, has been offered to date.
6: This has become what I refer to as a pissing contest.
I don't know how to say it any more bluntly than to say:
Put up or shut up.
Dave and Neil: In a lot of peoples' eyes, you guys are losing credibility in leaps and bounds. The time for talk has long since passed. It is now time to walk the walk. Actions speak louder than words, phone calls, posts and e-mails. Seriously guys, a resolution needs to be achieved here. And it needs to come quickly. I wish you Neil and you Dave the best of luck in the future. But this has to stop now!!!
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have a idea,I want whomever to call me in the mouning and I will tell you the evidance I have to prove Neil did this,But in return I want each persons word that they will not post or have it posted .This is to protect the people that are willing to go to court against Neil.Email me and I will give you my number.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Dave-
Theoretically, were I to call you, what would it prove? You could tell me that Elvis is your next-door neighbor. You can say whatever you want. You could lie your @ss off. How, as the receiving party, would I know your "evidence" is accurate? How am I to know that you are truthful? Verbally spoken "evidence" is equivalent to hand typed screen word "evidence". The only "true evidence" is that which can be visibly seen. I.e: photos, documents, etc. etc.. If you can tell me how, over the phone, you can beyond a shadow of a doubt prove Neil's guilt to me, then I will call you tomorrow. If not, well, that brings me to:
If this matter is so near and dear to you, why have you,yourself, not already brought Neil up on charges? Why do you not have any copies of a police report where you reported Neil's alleged "transgressions" to the T.P.D.? Why have you not already brought litigation against Neil? Why have your other "people", that you are trying to protect, not joined you in reporting Neil to the proper authorities? Or in bringing litigation?
My final point(s) is this:
1: It is easy to take sides here.
2: It is easy to say you have proof.
3: It is easy to attack one side or the other.
4: It is hard to substantiate your claims.
5: NO concrete evidence, supporting Neil's or Dave's claims, has been offered to date.
6: This has become what I refer to as a pissing contest.
I don't know how to say it any more bluntly than to say:
Put up or shut up.
Dave and Neil: In a lot of peoples' eyes, you guys are losing credibility in leaps and bounds. The time for talk has long since passed. It is now time to walk the walk. Actions speak louder than words, phone calls, posts and e-mails. Seriously guys, a resolution needs to be achieved here. And it needs to come quickly. I wish you Neil and you Dave the best of luck in the future. But this has to stop now!!!