fire_flyny
New member
how many people have purchased possible hets 66% ,50% hets etc from Tom and proven out the genes- please keep responses to breeding related experiences and resulting progeny /clutches
I think the question the OP asked is a very good one. There are people out there that are labeling snakes as possible hets that in reality are not. They do it because they think it will get them more money for something. I AM NOT IN ANY WAY SAYING ANYTHING BAD ABOUT TOM. I am only pointing out facts. In years past in some cases possible hets were pretty expensive, certainly a lot more then a normal. For example, a few years back a 66% possible het for Lavender Albino Ball Python was expensive, so if someone took a normal and sold it as such then they would get a lot more money for it. If anyone has sold a lot of possible hets and for the most part they do not prove out then I think that person should be questioned.
how many people have purchased possible hets 66% ,50% hets etc from Tom and proven out the genes- please keep responses to breeding related experiences and resulting progeny /clutches
But the point is...How would one prove that they are in fact possible hets? You can't! Their are no visual parent and you can just get really crappy odds. It happens. If you don't want to gamble, buy 100% from an established breeder.
Not trying to start an argument here, but keep in mind that some people do not have the resourses to always buy guaranteed hets. Some people buy the possible hets with hopes of proving one or some of them out. In some cases you can get several 66% possible hets for the price of one guaranteed het. If sellers are ripping people off by selling normals as possible hets then all or a very high percentage of them will not prove out. In theory two out of three 66% possible hets should prove out. If one out of ten that were labeled 66% possible het proved out, then in my opinion the seller was lying about them and selling normals as possible hets just to make more money. I know for a fact that people do it, because people have been caught lying. I am using 66% possible hets for example, they would have visual morphs as litter mates. 50% possible hets would have no visual litter mates. There are actually people out there that believe everything they are told, so they don't even realize that someone could be taking advantage of them. I will say that when buying hets, you should buy from someone you trust if you can because it will avoid all of this.
Brian Dierking
Yeah, Einstein. We get it.
ok people - time to focus on the topic: Tom Carlton @ Cypress Creek Reptiles.

Suncoast Herpetological;76 To Sharpshooter...there is only one inborn effing idiot that has posted on this thread and the rest of us have already identified you. A word of advice...newbies with smart mouths tend to get well and truly roasted here.... prior to banning :shootfoot[/QUOTE said:Whatever you say, Jonny Boy. I guess we'll see (and taste) who's carcass is better. Or maybe not.
i personally, would never sell poss hets as anything more than normals, with an added potential. same risk for the buyer, goes to some extent for the seller, if you want to make more money, purchase parents that will give you 100% hets, then you can mark up your price or whatever. if there is a clutch and some are going to carry the gene, and some arent, sell them at a normal (of that particular morph) price, and if that particular buyer gets lucky and has a gene carrier, best of luck and a big congrats to him. its about the hobby and having fun breeding and selling, not about money and business. by honest about it, sell poss hets as normals with an added bonus/potential.