• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Top Shelf Exotics (Inquiry)

Randy..

..Thanks. I guess collecting is another manner, and THAT is where we'll run into bigger issues. A group civil suit would still result in an empty judgement, ie. one that would look like a win with no 'prize'. All I want is what I paid for, exactly that and nothing more. If I had the option, I would get a refund, give the snakes back, and buy from someone reputable but now I, along with several others, are stuck in a pickle.

Interesting/funny thing: The signatures on the genetic guarantees look very similar between Chris, Patrick and Glenn.... but I guess we all knew that was coming.

-Jason
 
If you file a small claims case, the judge will review your evidence, and if halfway descent, and Chris is a no-show, you will win. However, it will only be good in the state in which you file, against Chris's assets in your state. Its a chore to get an attorney in NY, to file on your behalf, and that is why you may want to pool resources, get a real opinion from a real NY lawyer, and then make a decision, to include whether or not Chris is worth pursuing. But a rush to your local small-claims court in mid-America is not going to get you anything unless you identify assets of Chris's in your state.
As for the whole het thing. Some of you watch too much Court TV. If Chris's hets do not prove out this summer, and in fact come back as negative, once you get about 3 sets of results, then all who had hets can use that as a basis to file a civil suit for a return of goods and a refund at that point, and not have to wait until everything has been unproven over several years. Three sets of negative results at 500-1 odds, and Chris's track record, is more than a preponderance of evidence to get a refund. Whether Chris will be worth pursuing is a different issue, and you will have to decide that too. The first issue is what you will need to make a case. If a het or two amongst yourselves does prove out this summer, you het folks who may be holding junk will be in a poor position.
Jerry is right in that it may not be worth it. But with some pooling of funds (unless one of you wants to front $500 solo), you could find an attorney in NY in Chris's neck of the woods, and find out if he has assets worth pursuing in less than two weeks time.
 
NorthamExotics said:
..Thanks. I guess collecting is another manner, and THAT is where we'll run into bigger issues. A group civil suit would still result in an empty judgement, ie. one that would look like a win with no 'prize'. All I want is what I paid for, exactly that and nothing more. If I had the option, I would get a refund, give the snakes back, and buy from someone reputable but now I, along with several others, are stuck in a pickle.

Interesting/funny thing: The signatures on the genetic guarantees look very similar between Chris, Patrick and Glenn.... but I guess we all knew that was coming.

-Jason

Like you, I just want what I paid for, 0.1 Het High Contrast Albino BP, or my money back.
 
Jim , again, its not why I am suggesting

that you win a judgement. You are correct about assests in a particular state, but for me, when I win the judgement, it will effect his future when it relates to any credit. Because it shows up on his credit report!!!!!! All 3 of the reporting agencies.
That is what I am looking for. I know from the getgo that no monies will materialize if I win a judgement. But I also know that he will be branded for the rest of his life, and those judgements , (unless the court) forgives them, (which can happen in a bankruptcy hearing) will follow him, and the only way to release from a judgement would be to pay. Even under those conditions , his credit worthiness would be at ZERO. That is the avenue I would endeavor to pursue. As Ive indicated on more than one occasion, their is no money.
 
Bankruptcy laws... chapter 7 and chapter 13


Chapter 7 is designed as an orderly, court-supervised procedure by which a trustee collects the assets of the debtor’s estate, reduces them to cash, and makes distributions to creditors, subject to the debtor’s right to retain certain exempt property and the rights of secured creditors. (Visit your state bankruptcy page listed below to learn your specific exemptions.) Because there is usually little or no nonexempt property in most chapter 7 cases, there may not be an actual liquidation of the debtor’s assets. These cases are called “no-asset cases.” Usually a debtors with assets that they wish to keep and that are not covered by exemptions file chapter 13 bankruptcy.

A creditor holding an unsecured claim will get a distribution from the bankruptcy estate only if the case is an asset case and the creditor files a proof of claim with the bankruptcy court. In most chapter 7 cases, the debtor receives a discharge that releases the debtor from personal liability for certain dischargeable debts. The debtor normally receives a discharge three to four months after the petition is filed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Generally, chapter 13 is preferred by debtors who have a valuable asset, such as a home, that is not completely covered by exemptions and that they wish to keep. This is possible because under Chapter 13 a debtor proposes a plan to repay creditors over a three to five year period during which the debtor can make up overdue payments on any assets and pay into the plan the equivalent value of any assets not covered by exemptions. Since the debtors plan will require regular monthly or biweekly payments, Chapter 13 is usually only appropriate for an individual debtor who has a regular source of income.

At a confirmation hearing, the court either approves or disapproves the plan, depending on whether the plan meets the Bankruptcy Code’s requirements for confirmation. Chapter 13 is very different from chapter 7, since the chapter 13 debtor usually remains in possession of the property of the estate and makes payments to creditors, through the trustee, based on the debtor’s anticipated income over the life of the plan. Unlike chapter 7, the debtor does not receive an immediate discharge of debts. The debtor must complete the payments required under the plan before the discharge is received. The debtor is protected from lawsuits, garnishments, and other creditor action while the plan is in effect. The discharge is also considerably broader (i.e., more debts are eliminated) under chapter 13 than the discharge under chapter 7.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
What debt will bankruptcy not erase?

money owed for child support or alimony, fines, and some taxes;
debts not listed on your bankruptcy petition;
loans you got by knowingly giving false information to a creditor, who reasonably relied on it in making you the loan;
debts resulting from "willful and malicious" harm;
student loans owed to a school or government body, except if:-- the court decides that payment would be an undue hardship;
mortgages and other liens which are not paid in the bankruptcy case (but bankruptcy will wipe out your obligation to pay any additional money if the property is sold by the creditor).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can filing bankruptcy stop bill collectors from calling?

Yes. The automatic stay prevents bill collectors from taking any action to collect debts.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
KNOBTAIL said:
that you win a judgement. You are correct about assests in a particular state, but for me, when I win the judgement, it will effect his future when it relates to any credit. Because it shows up on his credit report!!!!!! All 3 of the reporting agencies.
That is what I am looking for. I know from the getgo that no monies will materialize if I win a judgement. But I also know that he will be branded for the rest of his life......


How Long Does Bankruptcy Stay on my Credit Report?

There are three major credit reporting agencies in the United States. Each agency maintains information about you and your credit history. This information is gathered on an ongoing basis from many sources that have extended you credit, such as banks, credit card companies and finance companies.

Matters of public record obtained from government sources, such as courts, including liens, bankruptcies, and overdue child support, will usually appear on your credit report. Most public record information stays on your credit report for 7 years. Bankruptcies are generally removed from your credit report after 10 years.
 
I inadvertently left out the attribution, it is a site called Bankruptcy America but I checked several sites and they are all giving the same sort of info.
 
lucille said:

How Long Does Bankruptcy Stay on my Credit Report?

There are three major credit reporting agencies in the United States. Each agency maintains information about you and your credit history. This information is gathered on an ongoing basis from many sources that have extended you credit, such as banks, credit card companies and finance companies.

Matters of public record obtained from government sources, such as courts, including liens, bankruptcies, and overdue child support, will usually appear on your credit report. Most public record information stays on your credit report for 7 years. Bankruptcies are generally removed from your credit report after 10 years.

The judgement will stay on his Credit Report until he pays you. You just have to re-file it every 7 years.
 
Four days and I've finally read all of this thread (up to this point).

It's a sad, sad day in the herp world when one of the "good guys" turns out to be bad. Chris J. you WILL get what's comming to you! Everyone that was taken by Chris should seek legal action asap if you want any justice done, sure, you may not get anything out of him, but he'll be affected by this for a long, long time.
 
Just to set the record straight about judgements

If the person goes bankrupt, in most cases, almost 100% prior to the new law being passed, the judgements were forgiven. However, in order for the judgement to be set aside, a recorded record from the trustee must be sent to each county where the judgement has been recorded. Or in each state.

For example if Chris had 10 judgements, and they were all in Erie county, then 10 forms would have to be sent showing that the judgements were set aside by the US trustee and they would be forgiven................but never forgotten! They are recorded for a minimum of 7 years. Even if Chris were to re-establish himself, his liability would always haunt him. In away its sad because I can assume he is a young fellow, who will have to rely on the good will of others in order to do basically anything that will require a credit check.

In todays bankruptcy, with the new laws relating to credit cards, if a judgement is issued by Mastercard, it cannot be forgiven until the loan has been satisfied. Thank you George Bush !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris could have handled this quite differently, but this is the result of an immature, person who out of desperation, thought he could fool the world.
In the end the only fool is the one in the mirror that he see's daily
 
Bankruptcy is actually a planned business decision for some "businessman". I work for one of the largest bank in the country and we have known people that have filed 3 or more times. If you think it will be the end of Chris you're wrong. As soon as it is discharged you can get a high interest mortgage. Six months later a better interest rate and 2 yrs later any mortgage you want. Unsecured loans are a little more difficult but there are always places to get money. After 2 years of good credit the bankruptcy is history.

Current assets are taken by the court but, if it is as some think, Chris has planned this for a while, then surely there are assets that have been transferred to someone else a long time ago. Not only that if Chris does have hets they would suddenly turn into wild caught adults pretty quickly and listed as having little value. I doubt the court would want to deal with snakes, but maybe. Your home and auto are routinely re-affirmed under 7 or 13. (You have to live and get to work). Re-affirmed means they are listed creditors that you choose to continue to pay.
 
kmurphy said:
Bankruptcy is actually a planned business decision for some "businessman". I work for one of the largest bank in the country and we have known people that have filed 3 or more times. If you think it will be the end of Chris you're wrong. As soon as it is discharged you can get a high interest mortgage. Six months later a better interest rate and 2 yrs later any mortgage you want. Unsecured loans are a little more difficult but there are always places to get money. After 2 years of good credit the bankruptcy is history.

Current assets are taken by the court but, if it is as some think, Chris has planned this for a while, then surely there are assets that have been transferred to someone else a long time ago. Not only that if Chris does have hets they would suddenly turn into wild caught adults pretty quickly and listed as having little value. I doubt the court would want to deal with snakes, but maybe. Your home and auto are routinely re-affirmed under 7 or 13. (You have to live and get to work). Re-affirmed means they are listed creditors that you choose to continue to pay.

Yeah Kevin you are right, bankruptcy is not that big of a deal. In Texas there is a whole list of stuff you can keep: house, car, horse (really).
And one can pop up somewhere else in a few years and start again.

It isn't for everyone, and most people don't want to go through it, but it is far from being the end of a world or career.
 
that was one of the reasons, why

so many people moved to Fl. . Become a resident, file for bankruptcy, and the laws here are very lieniant. They cannot touch your home in Fla.

but, putting that aside, I think we are really jumping the gun here. We all have to take a "wait and see attitude as to how this is going to work out" Somewhere he will have to address these as well as other issues.

One thing is for certain, herpers can deal with allot of things, but betrayel is the worst.
 
Bankruptcy Creditor, I'll take Old Fashion Revenge any day

At this point I have written off any hope of seeing the $1500 again. Chris is a thief, plain and simple and is without any honor. So my plan is to make that the most expensive $1500 he has ever stolen. After arrest, bail, attorney fees, dodging the IRS, NY State Tax Investigators, FBI. He will wish he had met his commitments. But some people need to learn their lesson the HARD way. I can make more money a lot easier than he can rebuild his credibility.
 
tejasranger said:
At this point I have written off any hope of seeing the $1500 again. Chris is a thief, plain and simple and is without any honor. So my plan is to make that the most expensive $1500 he has ever stolen. After arrest, bail, attorney fees, dodging the IRS, NY State Tax Investigators, FBI. He will wish he had met his commitments. But some people need to learn their lesson the HARD way. I can make more money a lot easier than he can rebuild his credibility.

Not to minimize the loss because to me $1500 is a fortune, but have your tax person look at it next year and see if it can be written off, at least you might get a portion of it to be useful.
 
KelliH said:
I know why people where afraid to post about past "not so good" deals with Chris. They felt intimidated by him, and they felt that it would do no good to post here, since Chris was so "well liked". I know of two seperate deals folks had that are not even ball python related that involve VERY subpar animals received from TSE (they were sick). You see, that was Chris' MO, intimidation, intimidation, intimidation. He's good at it. I never liked that aspect of his personality, although I tolerated it because I (like many others I'm sure) thought "at least he is an honest guy, he calls it like he sees it etc.".
Regretfully, I am one of those people. After reading this thread, and after talking to a few other gecko keepers about the situation, I’ve decided that I should probably post this, even though I’m not real proud to do so. This should also explain my “vote” in the poll that was added.

I ordered five baby leopard geckos from TSE in June (I think) of 2005. When they arrived, they appeared to be in decent health and I was pleased with them. I left good feedback, posted a picture or two, etc. After having them for a few days, I noticed that they weren’t eating much. At the time, I was not as well-versed in leopard geckos and I trusted that the animals I received from [the almighty] Chris Johnson at [the esteemed] Top Shelf Exotics were healthy, superior animals.

A few weeks had gone by and the geckos began losing weight so I did a few fecals (which was not easy considering they were barely eating). The samples were over-ridden with pinworm oocytes. “No big deal,” I thought, and I started treating them with de-wormer. I did not contact Chris or anyone else at TSE to let them know what was wrong because I assumed that I would be able to effectively treat the animals. Furthermore, after witnessing the way Chris publicly hounded and berated numerous other people, I expected that if I had brought it to his attention that he would have turned the situation back on me, making it my fault, and likely would have accused me of having an “infested” collection. Keep in mind that this was shortly after he had accused another “gecko person” of having sick animals in their collection, and I certainly did not want nor need the same “attention.” So, I kept my mouth shut.

The geckos continued losing weight and eventually began throwing up the medication I was giving them. I deeply regret not taking them to a veterinarian to find out if something else may have been wrong with them, and I accept full responsibility for their demise regardless of the fact that I strongly believe they were already sick when I got them. At this point speculation is all I have left, but I have a strong suspicion that there was something wrong with the geckos other than a pinworm infestation. Pinworm is easily treated in leopard geckos and rarely fatal if treated, thus my suspicion that there was something else wrong. Again, I should have taken them to a vet. I know that now, but you know what they say about hindsight.

Anyway, eventually the geckos started to die. I don’t remember if two died and I euthanized three, or if it was the other way around. I did take a picture of the last three though, just in case. I apologize in advance, because I know it’s not a pretty sight, but reality rarely is.

TSEleos8-15forBOI.jpg


For quite a while afterwards, I still believed that it must have been something that I had done considering the reputation Chris had, so I never said a word about it to anyone other than close friends. That was when I heard that not all of the animals he was selling were actually produced by him. I never asked if he had produced them, nor was I ever told, but I was under that impression when I made the purchase.

Now, for the record, I had approximately 50-60 other geckos at the time. Of those, I still have every single one with the exception of a few that I sold to a friend. None of these other geckos have exhibited any signs of ill health—not then, and not now. I have had a total of seven geckos die while in my care (current head count is somewhere around 140). Five of those seven were the ones from TSE, one was a hatchling that I had to euthanize because of a deformity, and the other was a female picta gecko that was killed by her mate during breeding. I apologize if that seems irrelevant, but in all honesty I think it proves my point that the geckos were already sick with something (coccidia, perhaps?) that they did not “catch” from any of my animals.

So there it is. Yeah, maybe I should have said something at the time, but it could have easily cost me a lot more than the $190 I spent on the geckos. I regret not taking them in for further evaluation, regardless of whether or not it was too late to save them. But, I feared the wrath of Chris, and saying something to him wouldn’t have done the geckos any good anyway. After all, I’m just a “nobody” who wouldn’t have stood a chance if caught on the other end of Chris’s MO here, and I just didn’t need that.

Sorry this ended up being so damn long.
 
Contact Paypal Immediately

I decided to see what would happen if I filed a dispute with paypal, since that is what Chris Johnson had suggested we do if we wanted to cancel an order and get a refund. After taking a few minutes to fill out the dispute form, I despaired to have a message pop up saying that I'd exceeded the 45 day period.

I called paypal's customer service (402-935-2050) and spoke to a representative about my experience and it appears that paypal is monitoring these claims and reserves the right to investigate up to 180 days after the transaction. They will work with law enforcement, and would like the investigating officer or agent to call 408-967-9919.

They also gave me websites to the Internet Fraud Complaint Center- www.ic3.gov and the National Fraud Information Center www.fraud.org.
 
Paul,

Thank you for coming forward with your experience. I hate to think how many more like yours there are that didn't come forward at the time. Maybe you speaking up will encourage others to come forward as well.


Maki,

That's some very interesting information from Paypal. I think I will call them personally tomorrow about my claim as well. Even though it was denied for being over 45 days, perhaps we still can get some help through them....and they will have record of just how many people paid TSE through Paypal, and how many of them have filed claims.
 
Even though it was denied for being over 45 days, perhaps we still can get some help through them....and they will have record of just how many people paid TSE through Paypal, and how many of them have filed claims.
Good Idea!
Has anyone contacted KS to see if they might provide a list of TSE's customers who filed a complaint?
 
KS response

Casey Hulse said:
Good Idea!
Has anyone contacted KS to see if they might provide a list of TSE's customers who filed a complaint?

Casey,
I contacted KS last week, and their reply was that they couldn't disclose information of that nature to me, but if I would give them the Case ID, and the Pwd assigned to me by the IC3.gov Internet Fraud website that they would contact them and provide any information requested. I would suggest others that have filed Fraud charges, contact KS as well.
 
Back
Top