This thread has touched a lot of bases
I had a couple of thoughts and opinions I wanted to plant in here.
First off, my sympathies to Stan and Chris R. and any others who hinted at or directly raised the questions about hets from TSE proving out. I think it a valid question of any supplier of hets, and more-so when there are reasons for doubt raised in any aspect of a supplier's business absent a track record of proving-out. I have no reason to think that they are not true hets, but that and $1 will get you a cup of coffee for all I know. Stan and Chris, I could only hope that testimonials will be found that give you peace-of-mind, but maybe the bulk of hets that TSE has shipped haven't matured enough yet to verify things.
I have no problem with the decision of TSE to only guarantee genetics to the first buyer. I am not saying its the best business move, but it is their choice to make, and for potential buyers to judge them by. TSE's legal obligation (if proven not-het) would be limited to what with the first buyer? Just the purchase cost? ....many answers there. And to the second buyer who paid more for it? And the proof? Forums like this are the overwhelming first and best?) recourse.
I know there is an ongoing thread in the Business Forum about het guarantees. I know it was suggested in this thread that a buyer of hets that were proven to not be hets would have some civil litigation recourse. If all could be proven, I would agree. But it would take more than the word of the buyer saying "I bred this Albino (and the milkman snake did not sneak in there)to this het two years in a row, and I got nothing but visual normals ...". The "proof" controls that a judge (small claims) or jury would require (some huge lawsuit), even with genetic testing, would create a long-term boondoggle so as to make it highly impractical. Not impossible, but very difficult to justify pursuing from the financial viewpoint of the buyer.
The "buyer-beware" adage goes back millennium, for all the right reasons. And there is the BOI and other communication venues to help identify the good from the bad, and it will only grow in the coming years. My own perspective is that the number of purveyors of het-balls has grown exponentially in the last 2-3 years, and that the number of complaints about hets not being hets is due to mushroom in the next 1-2 years.
As before, I wish Chris and his business the quickest of recoveries. Not to make an excuse for the problems mentioned in this thread, but if TSE only bends, but does not break, through Chris' recovery ordeal, I would remind all that we know of, or have seen, worse when a key member in a small business goes down.