• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

TSA forces cancer survivor to show prosthetic breast

They ban liquids from being carried onto planes now because of liquid explosives and other corrosive chemicals. There are multiple plastic type explosives as well. My question is, how would a pat down, a metal detector, or a naked body can be able to catch liquid or plastic explosives/ or corrosive chemicals in a plastic container that is hidden up some guy's butt or in some woman's va-j-j? Or a plastic/wooden knife, shiv, etc. that is hidden in the same areas? Seriously? All of these "enhanced security measures" are basically worthless because people will still find ways to beat the system. Terrorists will still find ways to get weapons through. What's next, checkpoints on highways for random vehicle searches? Cavity searches? Blood tests? Lie detectors?
 
Jen you are exactly right. The criminal element will always find ways to hide stuff. When the inmates have their family and friends bring them drugs in prison.... it goes into one of two locations. They swallow it or they keester it. Both places they know we cant touch.... but we can put them in a cell and wait for them to pass it.

All the gov is doing is treating honest citizens like criminals. Actually they are treating them worse than criminals. When I worked at the womens joint if I did a pat search like they did I would have felony charges filed against me for sexual misconduct of a law enforcement officer.
 




You know, one of my favorite youtube video's is one done by a libertarian professor who talks about how far you will allow intrusion into your lives and when will you draw a line in the sand and state "I will not comply!" "What happens when the line is crossed? Will you back up draw another line and state, now cross this line?"
 


You know, one of my favorite youtube video's is one done by a libertarian professor who talks about how far you will allow intrusion into your lives and when will you draw a line in the sand and state "I will not comply!" "What happens when the line is crossed? Will you back up draw another line and state, now cross this line?"

Well, I'm about at that point. Regardless if one thinks I'm wrong or that I really am, I believe these pat downs and scanners used on children are a violation and a unlawful act from a government agency. I truly believe that so I have to ask myself what would I be willing to do? Just voice my opinion?

I believe this is a unlawful search. That if any police officer, teacher, school administrator, or security guard at any other location in the United States would conduct such searches on three, four, six year old children they would open themselves up to sexual assault charges. Sticking hands in my children pants isn't going to happen, period. I understand they believe they are just doing their job. I don't think that has ever been a justification for committing a crime. Following a unlawful order is never a lawful excuse.

Their parents believe they have been assaulted so I will stand with them and call for any D.A., sheriff or police chief who would take a stand in their jurisdiction and try to pursue charges against individual agents until the policy is changed. I don't think any would ever try and chance of anything sticking far less but that shouldn't stop one for trying if they believe this is a violation.

My individual opinion, Wanted for crimes against children.

 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    108.6 KB · Views: 93
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    212.1 KB · Views: 109
But its the government.. they dont have to follow the laws set forth for the rest of us to follow.

I would love to see a suit shut down the TSA and their sexual assualts.
 
How much freedom are people willing to sacrifice on the altar of the quest for "security"?

Well, there are a lot of places in the world now that I will just never visit as I flatly refuse to fly to get ANYWHERE. I am not willing to sacrifice the privacy of my own body in order to utilize those services.

Quite frankly, THAT is the stand that everyone needs to take. The airlines will either change the policies or go out of business in that case. Not just "NO!", but "HELL NO!!!".
 
At least the Brits have taken a stand and said no to the Porno Scanners on kids. They say it's the same as child porn.

Now if we can just get the US to quit sexually assualting our kids.
 
That is the stand I have took Rich. I refuse to fly. I will not subject myself to being molested. I wont walk thru a porno scanner. And considering how I have been trained by the state and feds to protect myself in a hostile situation... I pitty the fool... that tries to force the issue.
 
But its the government.. they dont have to follow the laws set forth for the rest of us to follow.

I would love to see a suit shut down the TSA and their sexual assualts.

That brings up an interesting question. Are government officials subject to the same intrusive TSA scannings and gropings as us peons are? What about their families? :rolleyes:
 
That brings up an interesting question. Are government officials subject to the same intrusive TSA scannings and gropings as us peons are? What about their families? :rolleyes:



One of the segments states that even the TSA employees get to avoid both pat downs and scanner when they travel.
 
But its the government.. they dont have to follow the laws set forth for the rest of us to follow.

I would love to see a suit shut down the TSA and their sexual assualts.

Yeah but in the video in post #69 the congressman talks about how his fifteen year old daughter was taken away from his wife without notice or consent and subject to a private pat down in a private room. If it happens to their families there may be some hope on the legislation front.
 
and with the way the 15yr olds are looking now days... who's to say it was a free feel up in a private room.
 
Lawmakers in New Hampshire introduce bill to criminalize TSA groping procedures



Quote Andrew Manuse - New Hampshire State Rep.
"New Hampshire resident taken into the backroom and given a body cavity search." "They actual stuck fingers inside of her."
 
Quote Andrew Manuse - New Hampshire State Rep.
"New Hampshire resident taken into the backroom and given a body cavity search." "They actual stuck fingers inside of her."

There would have been a beat down that would have made the WWE proud. If that had been my wife or GF... I would have gladly spent a night in jail.... but that mother :censored: would had been feeling me before they got me off them.
 
Back
Top