• In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.

    Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
    Sponsors - Eliminated
    Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
    Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days

    Account Upgrades Page
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Venomoid in/near Indiana?

The guy came for advice , not lectures. He knows what he asking . Lighten up a bit. If a question offends you, just don’t answer it. (Sorry Arc)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
FracksSake said:
The guy came for advice , not lectures. He knows what he asking . Lighten up a bit. If a question offends you, just don’t answer it. (Sorry Arc)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I think authoritarian type attempts to direct conversation to a narrow response will simply cause friction. The OP had her ideas, readers had differing ideas, they should be able to express, just as she expressed hers.

I think the objections to the OP came from her inability to hear the opinions of others (as well as her false accusation).
 
Lucille said:
I think authoritarian type attempts to direct conversation to a narrow response will simply cause friction. The OP had her ideas, readers had differing ideas, they should be able to express, just as she expressed hers.



I think the objections to the OP came from her inability to hear the opinions of others (as well as her false accusation).
Click to expand...



Okay. I’m not arguing one way or another, I just saw a question was asked and it seemed like heat seeking missiles were aimed from the start. No biggie.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think you are being a bit naive. Venomoids are a hot button topic, and feelings run high. If the OP's only purpose was to get information, she would have simply picked out the informative replies and gone her way. But she did not. She was forceful and nasty while addressing some of the replies when she did not need to address them at all.
Here was her first post:
Arctophile117 said:
I was hoping anyone could refer me to a vet who does the venomoid operation in or near Indiana. Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
Let's change it up to a different hot button topic, what if, instead of a reptile forum, someone had posted on a forum devoted to people "I was hoping anyone could refer me to a doctor who does abortions in or near Indiana."

No rational person would expect readers to keep their opinion to themselves and only post if they had such a referral.
 
Offered my experience with venomoids to be helpful on the subject, childish OP resorted to calling names & having a hissyfit. He or she won't be missed.
 
hotlips said:
Offered my experience with venomoids to be helpful on the subject, childish OP resorted to calling names & having a hissyfit. He or she won't be missed.
Click to expand...



You’re right . I reread it and see I missed a page. My apologies ... I’m not being sarcastic . :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
FracksSake said:
You’re right . I reread it and see I missed a page. My apologies ... I’m not being sarcastic . :)
Click to expand...

I don't think you need to apologise, I think you made a very valid and reasonable point. The OP did not come here for a discussion on the rights and wrongs of the venemoid treatment, she came to ask about vets who might conduct the operation, and at first she was met quite reasonably, even though this is a process many people would not recommend.

Unfortunately this is a very emotive issue, and it was somewhat naive to think that there would not be a heated response somewhere along the line. If she had risen above that, ignored the hotheaded comments and continued with the more reasonable aspects of the discussion instead of getting defensive, or even just stopped responding, this would have faded away. Instead she resorted to name calling and obviously sent some reprehensible private messages we aren't party to, resulting in her ban from the site.
 
Back
Top