Well, I'm not exactly sure if this is true in ALL the classifieds forums, but I just created a thread in the Mammals Classifieds using a test account (which is a registered user only), and using the Classifieds Control Panel, I was able to hard delete that thread. I also looked through the moderator audit log and found that there is only one event in the Mammals Classifieds section recently, which was Ken Harbart locking a thread in that section.
So based on evidence I have been able to find, it is my opinion that the originator of that classified ad PERMANENTLY deleted their own thread in that section. Anyone else doing that would have showed up in the moderators log. Such actions being done by a member with their own thread does not show up in any such log that I am aware of.
Addressing the issue of moderators trying to MODERATE a thread in the classifieds section, that is entirely within their purview to do so. If a request is ignored to tone things down, then warning points are certainly justified. In all fairness, the moderators were not obligated to do a "pre-warning point warning" at all, and could have simply issued the warning point(s) immediately. The warning points are not the penalty for inappropriate actions on this site. THEY are the warnings that continued steps in the direction you are being warned against can result in the REAL penalty of being suspended from this site. It isn't called the "warning system" just from a random selection of combined words......
So based on evidence I have been able to find, it is my opinion that the originator of that classified ad PERMANENTLY deleted their own thread in that section. Anyone else doing that would have showed up in the moderators log. Such actions being done by a member with their own thread does not show up in any such log that I am aware of.
Addressing the issue of moderators trying to MODERATE a thread in the classifieds section, that is entirely within their purview to do so. If a request is ignored to tone things down, then warning points are certainly justified. In all fairness, the moderators were not obligated to do a "pre-warning point warning" at all, and could have simply issued the warning point(s) immediately. The warning points are not the penalty for inappropriate actions on this site. THEY are the warnings that continued steps in the direction you are being warned against can result in the REAL penalty of being suspended from this site. It isn't called the "warning system" just from a random selection of combined words......

