I just disabled the remote topsites links. Let's see if that makes a difference. If not, I'll just try something else.
WebSlave said:Oh yeah, to address that "tweaks" issue brought up. Sorry, but I do not consider 800x600 as the lowest common denominator any longer. That was the standard I had to use back when I was programming for the State of Florida more then 5 years ago. If you can't use 1024x768 then you either need a new monitor or a new graphics card, or both. Time to do an upgrade, I am afraid....... That's as bad as using dial up when the rest of the world is going broadband. No offense intended, but I do tend to try to use design specs that target the upper end of the spectrum, rather then the lower end. The rest of the world will catch up eventually, and I see no reason to hold back everyone else while waiting.
.Can't resolve "www.faunaclassifieds.com".
or people who cant see like me800X600? Jesus...Only people over 80 use that resolution.
jglass38 said:Its not DNS when I can download a completely different browser and hit the site consistently in a fraction of the time (without caching pages).

robin s. said:but then rich why can i browse everyother site and surf smoothly and come here and hiit a wall?
robin s. said:or people who cant see like me
rich maybe its comcast.... i have had several people on the east coast tell me how horrible comcast is... i know they used it only for personal use.. but could it be a comcast problem?
and no it is not running any faster i get the "green screen" some times it take for ever or i get errors on the page and it doesnt even load... i also get those blank spaces and red "x"s like chris spoke of