• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Wes "Wilomn" out of control ?

Dave Lawson said:
No, No Laura, I am not in the least upset that this thread was moved :NoNo: This thread about Wes is in no way different then this post about me but yet this thread about me has been in the BOI for years. why wasn't it buried here? Acording to the rules quoted by you and Dthomas it does not belong there either.

Will you move it now or doesn't the same rules apply to me?
Click to expand...
Well Dave, to answer one of your questions, I do not have the power to move a thread from one place to another.
And if you're not upset, then why all the fuss to begin with?
Maybe you should try reading a little before posting on the BOI http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8880 Plenty of information right there.
 
OK Bobby, Then you are saying that the BOI has not only a double standard but even a third, right? That it is OK to post a thread in the wrong area (which is a rule violation) as long as it has unfounded statements to a crime, correct? remember it was proven that a certain person (not me) robbed his daddy's pet shop and as to the others they were found to have no merit so you can stop :deadhorse .

That thread did not meet the prerequisites to be on the BOI. but if its about me or anyone else that has a target on them it is fine, all that you all have shown here in your post and actions in this thread is that the rule don't apply for or to certain people.

But I will either

A) pay the money to be able to apply warning points

and if that is not allowed then I will

B) Pay so that someone else can do it for me.

What is good for the goose should be good for the gander.


Oh and Laura the only thing that is upsetting to me is the fact that the people that have the power to inforce the rules choose not to do so to the people they like but will ding the living :censored: out of a person they don't like for the same thing. You all have reinforced Wes' behavior and made it clear to him that he is above the rules and the people that have dinged wes for violations have suffered the wrath of wes and others in some way. I would like for the BOI to go back to the old way of only a select few Mods and no one else can give points (the iron rule format). You all remember the days were you had to have proof not just a imagination and fingers to type like it is now.

Most of the mods are open minded and are doing what they can but to the rest of you all you are doing is taking the Boi down a path that to ruin.


To all of you I say Thank you :thumbsup:
 
OK Dave, you will never get the point. You somehow think that what Wes done by way of name calling is just as bad as your conviction for breaking the law, yes Dave, Wes needs to be conviced, hung and horse whipped for calling someone a scumbag. GET REAL!!

I have explained why your thread needs to be on the BOI, as well as why the warnings are laxed more now FOR EVERYONE, not just Wes. But you are still not happy.

What else can I say? Well maybe this:
 
Dave Lawson said:
Oh and Laura the only thing that is upsetting to me is the fact that the people that have the power to inforce the rules choose not to do so to the people they like but will ding the living out of a person they don't like for the same thing. You all have reinforced Wes' behavior and made it clear to him that he is above the rules and the people that have dinged wes for violations have suffered the wrath of wes and others in some way.
Click to expand...

Where on EARTH are you coming up with this??? Have you actually looked at Wes's warning points, and who gave them to him??? :eek:

I'm curious, if you only make $200 a month (and only "in season"), how could you afford to pay the $100 just to be able to issue warning points? :NoNo:
 
Well Bobby, the onlything that you explained is that since I have a criminal past and Wes does not that is the reason the post stays on the BOI.

CAT-72, HAVE YOU LOOKED AT HIS post lately and seen the violations in almost each and every post and on what date was he last given points and for what. As far as the $100 I got it like that. :rofl:

I would suggest that you all read the entire thread and you will see how funny you all sound twisting the rules around to fit stand on this matter.

The fact is that rules are rules and no matter how you slice it it is still the rules. This rule apply to me, you and Wes, laxed or not if you guys relax them anymore they will not exist, well towards Wes anyway.

Maybe someone needs to check the recent points given to people since the 26th of feb. and see what the the points were for, who gave them. I will almost bet that the rules were not the relaxed for them. :rofl:
 
Once again Dave you show that you know nothing. Your little cloud of smoke is nothing more than whining at best.

You do have one thing correct, your sticky fingers. Unlike Wes you have been caught taking things that do not belong to you.

I know, it was not you, even though you were the one proven in a court of law. It was everyone's faught but yours, we have heard that song way too many times.
 
Bobby, what did I take, who did I take it from and when was I convicted? Surely sinse you know more then I do about be please fill me in and I hope you have proof. :yesnod:
 
shrap said:
Dave,

Go away.
Click to expand...

I agree sammy.


Dave, you have a record longer than both your legs.

You have how many judgments against you for ripping people off? Not even counting the arrest records.

It can be seen here: http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34668&page=1&pp=40

And here:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95906&highlight=Dave+Lawson

Oh and here:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35608&highlight=Dave+Lawson

And more:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28976&highlight=Dave+Lawson

And here:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18780&highlight=Dave+Lawson

Oh yes:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3239&highlight=Dave+Lawson

But not done yet:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16&highlight=Dave+Lawson

Well here is too much to read:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/search.php?searchid=528245&pp=25&page=1

Dave, how many bad threads do you have in the BOI? Hell, I can't even read them all. :ack2: :rolleyes:
 
Dave Lawson said:
Nope. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

But it was everyones fought/problem but yours.

Yea Dave we get the picture.

Funny thing how convicts blame everyone but themselves.

It was the police, judge, defence attorney, prosecute, the person they robbed and even momma. It was not them that was going around with the sticky fingers, stalking, stealing mail and taking reptiles without paying for them.

Yes Dave, we have got the picture. You are a real peach, correct? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Seems that dave "the snitch" lawson has some problems with wording too, along with intelligence, or lack thereof, in general.

This entire thread has not been about anything other than HIM feeling singled out. I can't find a single place where he has addressed an issue anywhere NEAR me being out of control.

You're an idiot dave "the snitch" lawson, as well as a scumbag in your own right. There are 50 posts before this one, my first in this thread and NOT one of them has ANYTHING to do with anyones control OTHER than your lack of it. You're not in control of anything other than those flapping lips of yours and nothing gets past those except lies.

I SERIOUSLY doubt I'll be back on this thread, snitch, you're just not worth the time.
 
WOW BOBBY, You got there by posting those links, Gosh you sure proved a point :thumbsup:

Did you even read those threads? 2 of them stated i WAS A GREAT GUY TO DEAL WITH, 1 was from back when Richard Cole and his wife were casing my place, 1 was from a girl that gave the boot to and yes I was arrested and the charges were dropped the rest was from Gubitz and I was cleared of it when it was proven that Gubitz robbed the store 3 different times and the shop was owned by Gubitz's daddy. I ask you to show proof.

Read the links next time.

Oh and I really like the link that was dead. :rofl:

Wes with post like your last one you only proved my point. :shootfoot
 
Dave Lawson said:
I was cleared of it when it was proven that Gubitz robbed the store 3 different times and the shop was owned by Gubitz's daddy.
Click to expand...


This is the second or third time you have mentioned this and the second or third time you have been wrong.

Many people suspect Neil engineered the breakins at his own store for two reasons.

The private investigator's report which stated that there was no definitive proof but that the PI suspected and conjectured that Neil was responsible based on Neil's interaction with the police and the statements made by an ex-employee that was working for another nearby company when interviewed. A company that was later shown, definitively, to be criminal in their own right- although the PI did not know this at the time, it makes the interview and the PI's conjecture somewhat suspect.

Secondly, several animals that Neil had reported as stolen showed up for sale, by Neil, fairly shortly afterwards. Again, very suspect behavior but it was not the full list of animals that had been reported stolen and, while suspicious, it's not proof.

I, personally, think that Neil probably did break into the store in an attempt to commit insurance fraud BUT this is a belief based on the avaliable evidence (not definitive and not proof) and my personal thoughts about the man's character and personality. I reccognize though that nothing was proven, as you have repeatedly (and oncorrectly) stated it was. While I don't like Neil or the fact he's still selling animals, I'm honest enough and bright enough to know the difference between "suspected of" and "proven guilty" ... and the cops did the same interviews that the PI did and didn't come to the same conclusion and Neil was never prosecuted or even arraigned for the act. You've gotta be familiar with arraignment's Dave, you've had so many of them.

I'm not sure why you decided to became active here again Dave, but it frankly sickens me to see a known, proven criminal like yourself making all these posts as if you weren't a lying, cheating, stealing, stalking, scamming bad guy. It's not as if you've got anyone fooled either- everyone who knows you knows what you are and everything you type is rejected or ignored because people know a complete lack of value when they see it.

Go away Dave. Just go away.
 
everyone who knows you knows what you are and everything you type is rejected or ignored because people know a complete lack of value when they see it.

Posted by Seamus

So you know me? Have I sold you anything, have you sold me anything, have we talked on the phone how do you know me? All you know is the :censored: on this board.

Gubitz was not convicted, yes you our right but remember Daddy did not press charges and it was Neil's daddys store Neil was only the the manager.

enough about that.

I have several people on this site that buy from me repeatedly and have remained happy with the deals and they have read every single word on here, I would almost beat that they are read this now. They know me and they don't reject what I say.

No Seamus you know nothing about me only the crap that is here have you read any of the post that say I am a good guy? I will guess not, but then I would not expect that it would take the fun out of it for you to be that honest. I can honestly say that I do not know you but I do know your type.
 
Dave, what part is Seamus wrong about?

He said:

I'm not sure why you decided to became active here again Dave, but it frankly sickens me to see a known, proven criminal like yourself making all these posts as if you weren't a lying, cheating, stealing, stalking, scamming bad guy
Click to expand...

Yea that about sums you up Dave. The topic of this thread was about (out of control), well IMO you have been that way for way too long. You can not even obey the laws, that would be why you are a (ex-convict/proven criminal), with such a long track record.

It would be you Dave, who's words would hold no merit here Dave. Do not try to con this board. The proof is in the pudding, too bad yours was made with sour milk.
 
Well Bobby, the onlything that you explained is that since I have a criminal past and Wes does not that is the reason the post stays on the BOI.
Click to expand...

Dave, IMO the reason why this thread is inappropriate is because it is simply your opinion of Wes and his posts on Fauna. This would have absolutely zero influence on whether I would choose do business with him. And I can read his post here if I want so it is redundant.

The thread about you, that you are referring to, is about your being arrested for illegal activities. This would have a bearing on whether I wanted to do business with you. It is also something that I appreciate being posted so that I can be aware of it.

To me that's the difference between the two threads.
 
Dave Lawson said:
I am sorry that I posted this in the wrong area but here are there you all no it is a fact. I used used the last example of Wes calling someone "SCumbag" that is noticed. This threads purpose was to make a point that over 75% of Wes's post have no bearing on any thread at hand other then to give Wes a chance to call someone a name like "scumbag". I have seen many times where Wes has call someone a "scumbag" or other names in the pass week but yet no Dings, why? This is not a dig at anyone but If someone were to Wes it about Wes it would sound like a Avon lady convention Ding,Ding,
Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,Ding,

I know that Wes is a good source of cheap entertainment but rule violatons deserve a ding. I take my and he sould have to also.

Wes has 113 points today as of 5:43 est and count the rules he breaks and see if I am telling the truth.


Warnings to Wilomn
Warned By Warn Date Reason Relevant Post Moderator Comment
Stardust 03-02-2007 Profanity [ View Post] No Comment
christopher66 02-26-2007 Profanity [ View Post] No Comment
Rich Z 02-23-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] "Get bent" is not appropriate when referring to one of my moderators.
Dr Owens 02-22-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] No Comment
DAND 02-22-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] Again, addressing any one by anything other than the person's given name or screen name is abusive.
Dr Owens 02-20-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] No Comment
Laura Fopiano 02-20-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] You know I love ya honey, but..."dand, unless you truly are as stupid as I suspect you are" sorry I have no choice.
John Apple 02-20-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] cmon Wes ...the name calling is not allowed regardless of the person
DAND 02-20-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] Again, addressing someone by anything other than the person's given name or screen name is still abusive.
DAND 02-10-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] You may want to try and find a different way of expressing your opinion of others that follow the rules set forth on this site.
John Apple 02-10-2007 Profanity [ View Post] While I tend to agree with your assessment of Pruett ya gotta curb your language
Dr Owens 02-10-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] No Comment
DAND 01-31-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] Again, addressing someone by anything other than the person's given name or screen name is abusive and antagonistic.
Dr Owens 01-30-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] No Comment
DAND 01-30-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] As this post mirrors your antagonistic post from yesterday, so will this warning.
Dr Owens 01-29-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] I don't know if you're having this little meltdown on purpose or what, but this is getting old already.
Dr Owens 01-29-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] No Comment
Dr Owens 01-29-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] No Comment
John Apple 01-29-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] Wes ya gotta prove it before ya call people liars
Dr Owens 01-29-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] This is ridiculous Wes.
DAND 01-29-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] Antagonism towards moderators (let alone any other member) is not necessary, nor welcome.
DAND 01-28-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] Addressing someone by anything other than the person's given name or screen name is abusive and antagonistic.
Stardust 01-22-2007 Overly abusive towards another member [ View Post] dang Wes, no name calling
Dr Owens 01-22-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] No Comment
DAND 01-22-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] It is my belief that moderators (as well as everyone else here) should be addressed by their given names or SELF chosen alias'. In this case, Rich is a moderator and calling him anything other than his name is antagonism in my book.
WebSlave 01-20-2007 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 09-14-2006 Profanity [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 09-14-2006 Profanity [ View Post] SOME rules do still apply here.....
WebSlave 10-23-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] This one is permanent, Wes. You can't say you have not been warned this was going to happen.
WebSlave 10-23-2005 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] You are getting FAR too carried away Wes. Simmer down, or you are gone, permanently.
Dr Owens 10-23-2005 Antagonism Towards Moderators [ View Post] No Comment
Dr Owens 10-23-2005 Antagonism towards, or stalking, another member [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 10-18-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] This sort of talk WILL end on my site, Wes.
WebSlave 10-09-2005 Feedback/Reputation system abuse [ View Post] I hope you can afford the next fine and suspension.
Dr Owens 10-07-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] No Comment
Dr Owens 09-23-2005 Reputation System Abuse [ View Post] To brucestephenson: "dumbass" (16:39, 5th Sep 2005), "you're still a dumbass" (22:33, 23rd Sep 2005)
Dr Owens 09-18-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Are you trying for another suspension Wes? Because at the rate you're going it's not going to take long.
DThomas 09-18-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Wes, enough of the name calling.
Dr Owens 09-17-2005 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] No Comment
Dr Owens 07-22-2005 $80 fine suspension (fourth offense) [ View Post] This is actually your 5th Suspension. You'll have to talk with Rich about how much the fine will be.
WebSlave 07-02-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Last warning, Wes.
WebSlave 07-02-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Looking for another fine, Wes?
WebSlave 05-12-2005 Reputation System Abuse [ View Post] I was serious about this, Wes.
Ken Harbart 02-09-2005 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] Tone it down please, Wes.
WebSlave 02-08-2005 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] Watch it, Wes. You're going a bit overboard on this thread.
WebSlave 01-09-2005 $80 fine suspension (fourth offense) [ View Post] These are going to be getting to be expensive lessons for you, Wes.
Dr Owens 01-07-2005 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Calling people names in another language other than english isn't appropriate either Wes.
WebSlave 10-22-2004 Discourtesy towards another member [ View Post] And yet again. That is ENOUGH, Wes.
WebSlave 10-22-2004 Discourtesy towards another member [ View Post] Wes, that isn't necessary.
Dr Owens 08-21-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Please stop with the name calling Wes.
Dr Owens 08-21-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] If you have issues with someone other than Alan, start another topic.
WebSlave 05-21-2004 $40 fine suspension (third offense) [ View Post] You were warned, Wes.
WebSlave 04-17-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] If you attempt to draw the HELL forum crap into the BOI you WILL get suspended from this site.
Dr Owens 04-13-2004 Posting in inappropriate forum [ View Post] No Comment
Dr Owens 03-15-2004 Obvious Troll [ View Post] Wes,
WebSlave 03-11-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Wes, you are about to become the first person on the BOI to get the $20 fine and suspension.
WebSlave 03-07-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] This thread is NOT about Neil. Cut the sniping, please.
WebSlave 02-28-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Wes, you know better than this.
Dr Owens 02-13-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 02-05-2004 $10 fine suspension (first offense) [ View Post] You were warned, Wes. You have been suspended pending a $10 fine.
WebSlave 01-18-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] One more instance of name calling, and you WILL be suspended from this site, Wes.
WebSlave 01-06-2004 Discourtesy towards another member [ View Post] Wes, is this sort of static from you really necessary?
WebSlave 01-03-2004 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] I suggest you can the name calling, Wes. Consider this fair warning.
WebSlave 11-13-2003 Name calling and general derogatory statements [ View Post] Tone it down, please.
WebSlave 10-13-2003 Profanity [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 08-15-2003 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 06-17-2003 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] No Comment
WebSlave 05-27-2003 Failure to provide SUBJECT name in topic line [ View Post] Sorry, I had to delete this. Please make the topic line informative for the readers.
WebSlave 05-21-2003 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] This is not appropriate in this forum.
WebSlave 05-06-2003 Unnecessary roughness [ View Post] Tone it down please! This is not necessary here.
[Close Window]

It is funny how Wes claims to be all for laws but he can't even obey the little rules.
Click to expand...
Ya know Dave, .....so what , Wes got dinged and for the most of them he accepted that. What are you man...the kid that feels slighted and has to put the focus on someone else. Weeellll I gotta tell ya man , Wes in my opinion is leagues above you though he does tend to get outta control at times.
Here is something you can post, your long arrest record, names of the people you have ripped off, or stores you stole from. Name of your 'friend' in the big house.
Get over it Dave ...you have NO clout here :iagree:
 
Back
Top