SilverRaichu
Member
Buyer send deposit for an animal for sale, and then sends a payment a few weeks later then after another few weeks tells me they are no longer able to buy and wants to back out of the sale?
Well, the two are rather related, there's no concern about a deposit being refundable or not if the buyer follows through.Although I did make it clear that deposits are non refundable, I don't have a specific statement regarding backing out of a sale
Well, the two are rather related, there's no concern about a deposit being refundable or not if the buyer follows through.
So, send back the remainder of the payments and post the critter up for sale again.
If you read the BOI, a nonrefundable deposit followed by a back out is not unheard of. A TOS is a good thing to have, but if you look at those BOIs, many times opinion is swayed by the reason the buyer backed out.
If the buyer just decided they liked another animal from another vendor better, that is one thing; keep the deposit and don't give it another thought;
on the other hand, if the buyer suddenly became unemployed, or his work vehicle broke down, or his house burned down, readers sometimes are in favor of a refund simply because of need, and sometimes will mention that doing so makes a friend who may well buy again once the disaster has been dealt with.
Kudos for returning the money.Keeping a backed-out buyer's deposit is a sure fire way to make enemies in this business no matter what your TOS says. However, I'm a firm believer in a 10% restocking fee though.
![]()
If you read the BOI, a nonrefundable deposit followed by a back out is not unheard of. A TOS is a good thing to have, but if you look at those BOIs, many times opinion is swayed by the reason the buyer backed out.
If the buyer just decided they liked another animal from another vendor better, that is one thing; keep the deposit and don't give it another thought;
on the other hand, if the buyer suddenly became unemployed, or his work vehicle broke down, or his house burned down, readers sometimes are in favor of a refund simply because of need, and sometimes will mention that doing so makes a friend who may well buy again once the disaster has been dealt with.
How about "Breach of Contract fee", that less ridiculous?I still like restocking fee better, sounds less punishing.
Yeah, giving back a refund for humanitarian and plausible reasons all sounds good in theory, but the fact of the matter is that apparently many people will tell you any lie they think you will believe in order for them to get what they want from you. It surprises me not in the least that some people will get hard nosed about their terms of service after a few incidents such as I mentioned above, and stick to the letter of that implied contract. For good reason, in my opinion. Being in business is tough. Getting taken advantage of in business makes it even tougher.