actually i was not talking about faith or believing, its just the changes are so gradual its hard to seperate the 2 different hominids from each other at periods of time, where both flourished the land. Natural Evolution is a very slow and gradual process, that takes several hundreds of thousands of years. Every time earth went through and ice age things changed. All this stuff is shown in the timeline i put together.
Example there is a skull for homo-habilis (first hominid) dated 2.0 million years ago. Then 1.8mil years ago homo-georcicus And Homo-ergaster were found. This was noted from the location where geogicus was found
"This skull and Nearby Skulls Form A Near Perfect Transistion From Habilis to Ergaster". The same time period More habilis skulls were found. 1.7-1.6 mil years ago more ergaster skulls were found. Then 1.5 years after that homo-erectus was discovered.
Another example is in the austalopecies. The A.Boisei in 1.8 million years ago's notes.
"oh5, First though to be human ancestor, but was dropped over habilis" Another found to be 1.7 million years ago notes "
The cranium is similar to that of OH5, but is smaller and has other differences such as the lack of a sagittal crest" Then a 3rd from 1.4 million years ago.
"Although it has many features specific to bosei, it also lies outside the previously known range of variation of that species in many ways, suggesting that boisei (and maybe other hominid species) May have been varible than othen thought (delson 1997)"
See there is a pattern to this, every 200,000 years the species normally evolves enough TO warrant a new classification to scientist. There is where i think all the confusion is at. Even our own homosapiens species falls under different categories too. Mainly sorted by era's of evolution, That always seem to follow ice ages.
If we did not and do not evolve explain then how come it took a good part of 200,000 years to reach where we are at in this world now then. If god was so great and almighty and figured we needed to know where gold was at, then why not give us the intelect that we have now. Instead of placing us on a land with nothing but a fruit tree and some useless gold? To fend ourselves against "his creatures"
The theory of evolution is presented as a fact when it is not. IT HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN
What is proof of evolution? I ask this as i see proof all the time around me. Is it a math problem? Is it video footage of something evolving into something else? I never understand what the "proof" should be. It's been re-created with cells that evolve into more complex cells.... Here is some images, that give you a idea that independant evolution is real in animals too.
Link
One can say the very same about where is proof in the bible too. It was and is presented as fact, each time something is proven wrong another phrase from way after the first one was wrote, is quoted to explain it. When has anything said in the bible been proven to be true? Did moses, adam and the rest really live to be almost 1,000 years old? For years people have been looking for proof that the arch noah used was real, sill nothing at all. The more i read it and use rational thinking the more things i see wrong with the whole book.
EXAMPLE:
19: These three were the sons of Noah; and from these the whole earth was peopled.
20: Noah was the first tiller of the soil. He planted a vineyard;
21: and he drank of the wine, and became drunk, and lay uncovered in his tent.
Anyone else see anything wrong with this? I do not know when wine was invented, but according to the bible it was already in existince by the time moses was done with the floods. Just how many fossils of winemaking items and bottles have they found to date back to moses's time? which again according to the bible was only about 1,700+ years into creation? since the bible claims that both adam, and his sons all lived to be 900 something years old. If you apply the "every day is 1,000 years" thing to this, it works about to be almost 2 million years. So that would mean that its using real earth days.
Oh, and
here is more proof of evolution. This one is funny though, everyone would get a good laugh at it
I think i am done commenting on this (once and for all this time), i dont like to argue against religion. since i know it can anger to those who hold beliefs into it. Normally this is how these arguments over creationism and evolution end. All i have to say is give it time, eventually one side will prove itself out.
