deborahbroadus
HARD CANDY
James,
Perhaps I overlooked it, but I don't recall either Konstantin or myself suggesting that Terri should ship an animal that the buyer does not want.
My suggestion to her was to refund the man and cut him loose.
I don't know how all the above ties in to my care of animals?
Perhaps we are reading the same post from different perspectives?
In Post 8 the OP admits he was wrong to post (partly because he found no support perhaps?)
Then in Post 12...he finds support and conjecture to feed his fears/or primary motivation for creating this thread in the first place in the opinions of another dragon breeder and it was ON...off to the races! No facts, at that point, it's mostly imagination and supposition and imputing motives (I am also guilty of that).
Post 16 tried to insert the voice of reason and was ignored....
Then we got into she has sold his animal, she has sick animals, she's holding his money ransom..she doesn't care for her animals, and this is a business that's been operating probably longer than any of us here, AND can command those kinds of prices without having to deal with the whinners that don't recognize quality and would prefer cheap? They must be doing SOMETHING right.
Is everyone wrong, of course not. I am very aware that we all read through our own internal garbage (including me) and it takes time and skill to remain impartial and listen to the FACTS only, not our feelings.
This thread has degraded into a bunch of people "believing" and "feeling" and "supposing" but there's very little substance to support any of those feelings.
In a nutshell, should she ship the animal? NO. Simply because the customer no longer wants it. But, I do see conjectures that the OP would ship the same animal back. Should I jump to the conclusion that he would? I see it suggested.
Perhaps I overlooked it, but I don't recall either Konstantin or myself suggesting that Terri should ship an animal that the buyer does not want.
My suggestion to her was to refund the man and cut him loose.

I don't know how all the above ties in to my care of animals?

Perhaps we are reading the same post from different perspectives?
In Post 8 the OP admits he was wrong to post (partly because he found no support perhaps?)
Then in Post 12...he finds support and conjecture to feed his fears/or primary motivation for creating this thread in the first place in the opinions of another dragon breeder and it was ON...off to the races! No facts, at that point, it's mostly imagination and supposition and imputing motives (I am also guilty of that).
Post 16 tried to insert the voice of reason and was ignored....
Then we got into she has sold his animal, she has sick animals, she's holding his money ransom..she doesn't care for her animals, and this is a business that's been operating probably longer than any of us here, AND can command those kinds of prices without having to deal with the whinners that don't recognize quality and would prefer cheap? They must be doing SOMETHING right.

Is everyone wrong, of course not. I am very aware that we all read through our own internal garbage (including me) and it takes time and skill to remain impartial and listen to the FACTS only, not our feelings.
This thread has degraded into a bunch of people "believing" and "feeling" and "supposing" but there's very little substance to support any of those feelings.
In a nutshell, should she ship the animal? NO. Simply because the customer no longer wants it. But, I do see conjectures that the OP would ship the same animal back. Should I jump to the conclusion that he would? I see it suggested.

