hmm ..getting drag thru the mud..throw the flag..back me up to the fifty..I'm guilty of not selling boas to Joe...oh geez really..come on.
his envolope came tuesday morning and I had an envolope written to mail right back.. right away..sorry it takes 4 days..you should have it in friday mail unopened.
At this point may have better I did not sell to him...get a grip Joe..this has happened to me at least a dozen times..if not more..things happen and stuff gets sold...my bad sorry again. btw there are even better than I made on RI..go for it!
ps thanks to all that know me and the kind words...last thing I want is to hurt anyone..
You don't seem to understand the difference between not selling to someone (or refusing to sell to someone) versus ~breaching a contract~. Nor does it seem you understand that, once a check is in the mail, the deal is sealed & contract terms are met by the buyer. The animals are sold right at the point that a check is dropped into the mail (before you receive the check).
There is a big difference between a buyer backing out, or a seller deciding not to sell to someone since they have not received payment in timely fashion (or the terms of a contract were not met), versus breaching a contract.
What is disturbing is that:
#1 - The animals were previously promised (sold?) to someone else (person A).
#2 - Then they were sold to another individual (person B). Which, if you did not have money from person A, is not wrong, per se, but would place you in a position of not being a man of his word. If you did have money, from person A, then it = Breach of contract with person A.
#3 - Then they were sold to yet another person (person C), when a contract was in effect with person B (and he had upheld his end), and person B was told that the animals were sold to someone else (during the time that the check, from person B, was in transit to you) = Breach of contract with person B.
#4 - Then, since person C could not come up with the money, person B was told that the animals could be his again (reenacting the contract).
#5 - Then the animals were sold to person A, with the requirement of his paying more than the price that was previously agreed upon, without the knowledge of person B.
#6 - Person B learns, after you receive his check, that the animals have been sold to someone else (someone else was person A) = Breach of contract, X2, with person B.
#7 - Reason/s, for not selling to person B, keeps changing. Full truth, and consistency, matters a lot and it is not being seen in this case.
I was perfectly willing to accept that, perhaps, this was just an error in judgment and that it would/could be learned from.
However, that does not seem to occurring and it does not seem that you have the least bit of remorse.
