• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Dishonest guy Jon Boone (User name Geitje)

Please take note of the word offensive and itinerant.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gypsy

Noun[edit]
gypsy (plural gypsies)
(sometimes offensive) Alternative form of Gypsy: a member of the Romani people.
(offensive) An itinerant person or any person suspected of making a living from dishonest practices or theft; a member of a nomadic people, not necessarily Romani; a carny.  [quotations ▼]



Wiktionary really? :rolleyes:

If you're going to spend time on google trying to find links and quotes to argue with someone online from on top of your pedestal of political correctness - try at least using a real dictionary.

You know, one that can't be edited such as Merriam-Webster.



.
 
Regardless of where it is defined, my family did not fight poverty to make something of this life to be degraded as homeless or less than anyone else that wants to misuse the word. Take a look at the context he used the word Gypsy and if he meant to be portray it in a positive light.
 
Regardless of where it is defined, my family did not fight poverty to make something of this life to be degraded as homeless or less than anyone else that wants to misuse the word. Take a look at the context he used the word Gypsy and if he meant to be portray it in a positive light.


Is this thread about you and your family? Or your sensitivity to the word Gypsy?

Get over it, at the end of the day it's just a word. Sticks and Stones Brother!!
 
You are correct and I'll leave it alone. Just wanted to point out where the respect was lost by one of the few that spoke up for him.
 
ps. I rarely spend any time whatsoever on BOI, even with this thread, as I've got enough to tend to currently and considering holidays and my personal life. For those not paying close attention - that does not mean that I'm ignoring the OP, as I have animals coming in to choose from to help alleviate the issue with Wai/Ken.

I view this as progress, with the animals coming in, for you to fix the solution to this unfortunate issue. Thanks for letting us know, and I have faith that this will be a positive outcome, Jon.

Wai, I understand that this has been very frustrating on your end, but it appears that Jon is working on the issue. Take this as, like I said, progress, and hope for, and expect, the best out of this situation. This will take time, in him getting in these animals, and rectifying this, but this should be fixed and taken care of. My friend, I know you are upset, but to me, this is progress.

Now, we can go back to the programming of seeing many on this thread argue about the term " Gypsy ". :thumbsup:
 
The OP bought his 1.1 pair of geckos back in the summer. Its now almost the end of December. Yet people are urging him to "be patient" and "wait" some more? Why should it take more than half a year for the seller to resolve the issue? Am I the only one who things this is a tad ludicrous?

i-feel-like-im-taking-crazy-pills.gif
 
The OP bought his 1.1 pair of geckos back in the summer. Its now almost the end of December. Yet people are urging him to "be patient" and "wait" some more? Why should it take more than half a year for the seller to resolve the issue? Am I the only one who things this is a tad ludicrous?

i-feel-like-im-taking-crazy-pills.gif

I agree, I think people's view is being clouded cause they dont want this to be a bad guy thread and they like him. If it were someone they didn't, Im sure he'd be crucified by now:firedevil
 
I view this as progress, with the animals coming in, for you to fix the solution to this unfortunate issue. Thanks for letting us know, and I have faith that this will be a positive outcome, Jon.

Wai, I understand that this has been very frustrating on your end, but it appears that Jon is working on the issue. Take this as, like I said, progress, and hope for, and expect, the best out of this situation. This will take time, in him getting in these animals, and rectifying this, but this should be fixed and taken care of. My friend, I know you are upset, but to me, this is progress.

Now, we can go back to the programming of seeing many on this thread argue about the term " Gypsy ". :thumbsup:

Billy, I've been very patient the few months because I trust what he told me every time, but his promises failed to come true one by one, and he also ignored me !! Now I suggest he send the refund to his friend in LA, and I will take his geckos to his friend there and get my refund, is that sounds fair?
 
Billy, I've been very patient the few months because I trust what he told me every time, but his promises failed to come true one by one, and he also ignored me !! Now I suggest he send the refund to his friend in LA, and I will take his geckos to his friend there and get my refund, is that sounds fair?

The refund suggestion, to me, is fair as well.

I believe he did not ignore you, but got caught up in the stresses of his personal life. Is that an excuse? Nope, but it is an explanation, and to me, Jon coming on here, not arguing and admitting that he made a mistake, believing you first thing when you told him about the mis-sexed animals, and lets you publicly know he is working on getting animals to rectify this situation, is far more than what many others would have even done.

Including the fact that many on here know him, and back him up as well, only points to a hopeful resolve.

Like I have said, the refund suggestion is a great option as well. My point in all of this, is even though you have been inconvenienced, I am reading and having faith in Jon that he is going to make things right, in either regard. :thumbsup:
 
The refund suggestion, to me, is fair as well.

I believe he did not ignore you, but got caught up in the stresses of his personal life. Is that an excuse? Nope, but it is an explanation, and to me, Jon coming on here, not arguing and admitting that he made a mistake, believing you first thing when you told him about the mis-sexed animals, and lets you publicly know he is working on getting animals to rectify this situation, is far more than what many others would have even done.

Including the fact that many on here know him, and back him up as well, only points to a hopeful resolve.

Like I have said, the refund suggestion is a great option as well. My point in all of this, is even though you have been inconvenienced, I am reading and having faith in Jon that he is going to make things right, in either regard. :thumbsup:

First of all, if he was so "caught up", where did he have time to satisfy other customers while turning the lights off on the OP as soon as a refund was suggested? He didn't ignore Kasi Krauss, did he? Second, he didn't believe him "first thing". Also, had he not ignored the OP, he would not have had to let him know anything "publicly". He wants his money. He's made that clear. Read the thread.
 
Jon, you still have ignored the question of why you ignored Wai? I believe your relationship issues were the cause of your late arrival to the thread, but I guess you don't deny flat out ignoring him? A review of your prior BOI threads shows the same track record.
 
Having just done business with Jon, I can tell you his reputation speaks for itself. I can attest that at times his communication has not always been the quickest, but we were able to work thru it. I am not making excuses for Jon as it upset me as well, but looking back, I could have handled the situation better.

It seems Jon has offered a solution and given a logical reason why replacing the female when he gets a confirmed female would have the same net result as if he had sent the female in the first place.

For me, I would not hesitate to do business with Jon again.
 
Having just done business with Jon, I can tell you his reputation speaks for itself. I can attest that at times his communication has not always been the quickest, but we were able to work thru it. I am not making excuses for Jon as it upset me as well, but looking back, I could have handled the situation better.

It seems Jon has offered a solution and given a logical reason why replacing the female when he gets a confirmed female would have the same net result as if he had sent the female in the first place.

For me, I would not hesitate to do business with Jon again.

Is anyone actually reading this thread? Wai offered a solution. HE WANTS HIS FRIGGIN MONEY BACK, NOT THE FEMALE! What don't you get about that?
 
Having just done business with Jon, I can tell you his reputation speaks for itself. I can attest that at times his communication has not always been the quickest, but we were able to work thru it. I am not making excuses for Jon as it upset me as well, but looking back, I could have handled the situation better.
It seems Jon has offered a solution and given a logical reason why replacing the female when he gets a confirmed female would have the same net result as if he had sent the female in the first place.
For me, I would not hesitate to do business with Jon again.

Is anyone actually reading this thread? Wai offered a solution. HE WANTS HIS FRIGGIN MONEY BACK, NOT THE FEMALE! What don't you get about that?

Maybe Giantsfan24 can send the money,then do business again with Jon and buy the female when it's available.:shrug01:
 
Despite all of the (expected) Jerry Springer-ism’s in a “BOI post”, I’ll help summarize the issue:
Problem – honest mistake of sexing young P. rugosus. Some period of time later discovered they were not 1.1
Buyer’s objective – to breed P. rugosus at 1st available opportunity – late summer 2014.
Seller’s objective – to help supply an appropriate female in time for the buyer’s objective (or, rather ASAP).
Solution – people stop driveling over that which does not matter, and get a female for the buyer ASAP.

The rest of the input here from those not involved does not really matter – which helps define why most people ignore this website.
The rest of the input from those who are involved – can be worked out. I generally do not tell someone that “animals are on their way from somewhere” until they get here alive and well 1st. To help keep the “pipes clean” I’m not interested every single theoretical detail - even for myself. If the person is a known breeder, and not some gypsy living out of the back of their car, the animal will come when ready (and in this case giving Wai a free rugosus for waiting). Female P. rugosus are not setting around on FB, KS or any other advertising medium known in the USA. So, with live commodities, sometimes a wait is inevitable. Did I expect this problem? Refer to definition of problem above. Solution? Refer to solution above. The original poster “suffering” ? What is suffering? Having 2.0 P. rugosus, as opposed to 1.1 P. rugosus – when the only difference in breed-ability, which will not be realized until summer 2014? If I were in the OP position (which I have been many times before) then I’m only out a few extra insects for feeding an unwanted male, and free to sale (since I’ve offered to let him keep it) it whenever the female arrives.

Wai is afraid to receive animals during suitable and normal shipping conditions during the summer? In the same respect, I seriously doubt he could ship live geckos back to me.

The arrogance in this post is dispiccable. So Jon, you insinuate that Wai has not the experience to ship a reptile back to you, yet he noticed RIGHT AWAY that the supposed female you sent him was OBVIOUSLY A MALE, which your vast experience missed. Nobody needs your rendition of what the problem here is or the solution. The problem is simple. You didn't take Wai seriously til he came here. Solution...see Wai's post. Lastly, you would not be sending him a "free" Rugosus, you would be sending him the one you failed to send him originally.
 
Back
Top