Paige,
I personally have jumped on the "proof" issue specifically related to what I believe to be the "KEY" question, or comments related to it.
Neither party had documentation in the beginning, that we know of.
The "deal" feel through.
Then again neither party had documentation as to how they agreed to solve it, that we know of.
So again this leads me to the "KEY" question, can anyone provide proof for the agreement after the original deal fell through.
If Carson can provide proof that Guy "wanted" snakes and not a refund, he can clear his name, come out on top and prove to the rest of us that Guy is untrustworthy.
OR vice versa
If Guy can provide proof that he asked for a refund and was denied it, he can clear his name, come out on top and prove to the rest of us that Carson is untrustworthy.
OR
Since neither party has produced anything tangible, I am/have been hoping there is/was a third party with some actual "facts".
OR WORSE YET
No one ever produces any facts/proof and BOTH Carson & Guy come out of this with wounded reputations. Ultimately, we are all here on the BOI to figure out who is or isn't trustworthy. Those who have figured it out for themselves have since moved on and are no longer reading. Those like myself are willing to wait it out a little longer.
If people have got on you for expressing your opinion, sorry to hear that. We all have one and are entitled to it.
Thank you, Robert. Unfortunately, there appears to be a lack of written evidence on either side, which means it's all speculation and he said/he said. I would think that if there were written communications available on either side that they would have been presented by now and I'm surprised this has gone on this long without it. I've talked to Carson about this on multiple occasions and his story has stayed absolutely consistent in every detail from day one. He's owned up to his mistakes and has been very open about the whole thing. I would highly suggest talking to him personally in addition to the thread.