Ed Clark
New member
I think the real lesson here is that one should not be willing to give one's credit card number to someone who may or may not be be a low, dirty thief.
And stay away from doing business with underground reptiles!
I think the real lesson here is that one should not be willing to give one's credit card number to someone who may or may not be be a low, dirty thief.
I am not a business owner in this industry, but in every other industry I've worked, the actions taken by the company would be considered criminally unacceptable. Charging money to try and weed out time wasters? You've got to be kidding me. Merchants and vendors don't have the luxury of offending potential customers and those who make a habit of doing so rarely stay in business for very long. What a vile, shameless, putrid way to do business. Disgusting.
Underground shame on you for treating your customers the way you do!
You and your operation are not to be trusted. I know all about Rian Gittman because he screwed me for a few hundred $ when he was doing business as Pet Shop Reptiles. he gave me the run around for so long I just gave up on the refund he promised.
Let this be a warning to all unsuspecting buyers.
First a seller, can refund someone money without any penalty with just about any credit card processor. If your processor doesn't do this then you need to get a new one. So it cost UG nothing to process and return the credit card payment.
Second UGR made posts that are deceitful and lacking in transparency. There is a very valid argument especially in the herp world for charging a non refundable deposit on animals that may be sought after. This should discourage clowns whom would reserve an animal with holding it from others for weeks or months then just return it for a full refund.
However when UGR posted they made almost no mention of this, instead they tried to BS everyone about credit card processing and database automation, lol even mentioning advertising. This smoke and mirrors clearly shows their true intentions have nothing to do with stopping bad customers from ruining things for everyone else and everything to do with holding on to your money and locking you in. If everything was so automated as UG claims then clearly reversing a return would be just as easy and automated. So while I can see a reason for charging a "restocking" fee which is really a down payment fee or opportunity cost fee in this case, there is no reasonable explanation given for not waiving that in the first 24 hours for all customers, or for waiving it in this specific situation. UG didn't mention if there was anything more to this transaction such as the seller purposely trying to bind up animals so UG or a competitor couldn't take them to a show or any other reasonable explanation for why they stuck so strictly to the TOS. Walmart says they can turn you down for a return for almost any reason in a TOS, so what they pretty much never turn anyone down. That is why BOI exists, because the TOS isn't reasonable to adhere to in all cases. The point of the TOS for any business should only ever be to protect you from scamming customers. So only 1 of 2 possibilities exist, UGR is running a bad business, or UG is lying about the real reasons they wouldn't refund the money in full. Either way it its a lack of trust I wouldn't deal with.
Everything about the seller is besides the point if someone doesn't want the seller flipping animals, make a BOI post about the seller if you purchased from them. Even UGR does not dispute the rough storyline here. It would however be nice if the OP would return and let us know where it stands, but its also possible the OP is scared that they will get nothing for their $700 if they do that.