chkadii
New member
I am sorry if my post came off as being rude, that was never the intention. I just wanted to point out that the seller did the refund then cut off communication.
I agree this is a horrible. The whole amount should be refunded. Non-refundable is only there so the seller does not loose any major amount of money. But if the seller is the one that can not finish the deal, then it the whole amount should be returned.
Ms. Craig and Mr. Zowak is there a possiblity we could move this thread back to the subject?
No worries, I didn't see it as rude at all. It'll take a lot more than that to get me riled!

I think I understand where we were mixed up now; on the 25th Nick stopped answering Shaun for "several hours" (from Shaun's post), which prompted Shaun to send the text in the third screen shot. That was when I believed Nick had been duck hunting. Then after Shaun requested the return, they started falling out and sometime after that point Nick both returned the $140 and blocked/ignored Shaun for a much longer period of time, which is what you're referring to.
Regardless of when he actually went hunting, better communication about his concerns over the fees could have saved this transaction. And really, the duck hunting is kind of irrelevant. The deciding factor that convinced me Nick should refund the $35 was when he said he shouldn't have to pay the fees - which took place before the request for a return and subsequent Paypal claim. Now that we have a screenshot of Nick's verbal abuse of Shaun, it's the final nail in the coffin. It's a shame, $35 seems like such a small hill to die on (man, my idioms are morbid tonight). There were plenty of opportunities throughout this situation where a little more (polite, or at least professional) communication could have prevented all of this.
I agree, when one makes payments through paypal, the fees add up to greater than if it were one single payment.
I would ask for a refund if I were you as well, and he had no reason not to refund the deposit as well.